draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-02.txt   draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-03.txt 
Network Working Group A. Takacs Network Working Group A. Takacs
Internet-Draft Ericsson Internet-Draft Ericsson
Obsoletes: 5467 (if approved) L. Berger Obsoletes: 5467 (if approved) L. Berger
Intended status: Standards Track LabN Consulting, L.L.C. Intended status: Standards Track LabN Consulting, L.L.C.
Expires: December 31, 2011 D. Caviglia Expires: February 11, 2012 D. Caviglia
Ericsson Ericsson
D. Fedyk D. Fedyk
Alcatel-Lucent Alcatel-Lucent
J. Meuric J. Meuric
France Telecom Orange France Telecom Orange
June 29, 2011 August 10, 2011
GMPLS Asymmetric Bandwidth Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) GMPLS Asymmetric Bandwidth Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-02.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-03.txt
Abstract Abstract
This document defines a method for the support of GMPLS asymmetric This document defines a method for the support of GMPLS asymmetric
bandwidth bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs). The presented bandwidth bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs). The presented
approach is applicable to any switching technology and builds on the approach is applicable to any switching technology and builds on the
original Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) model for the transport original Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) model for the transport
of traffic-related parameters. This document moves the experiment of traffic-related parameters. This document moves the experiment
documented in RFC 5467 to the standards track and obsoletes RFC 5467. documented in RFC 5467 to the standards track and obsoletes RFC 5467.
skipping to change at page 1, line 42 skipping to change at page 1, line 42
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 31, 2011. This Internet-Draft will expire on February 11, 2012.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 6, line 24 skipping to change at page 6, line 24
that they relate to traffic flowing in the upstream direction while that they relate to traffic flowing in the upstream direction while
the existing objects relate to traffic flowing in the downstream the existing objects relate to traffic flowing in the downstream
direction. The new objects also differ in that they are carried in direction. The new objects also differ in that they are carried in
messages traveling in the opposite direction. messages traveling in the opposite direction.
2.1. UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC Object 2.1. UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC Object
The format of an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object is the same as a FLOWSPEC The format of an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object is the same as a FLOWSPEC
object [RFC2210]. This includes the definition of class types and object [RFC2210]. This includes the definition of class types and
their formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object is their formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object is
TBA by IANA (of the form 0bbbbbbb). 120 (of the form 0bbbbbbb).
2.1.1. Procedures 2.1.1. Procedures
The Path message of an asymmetric bandwidth bidirectional LSP MUST The Path message of an asymmetric bandwidth bidirectional LSP MUST
contain an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object and MUST use the bidirectional contain an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object and MUST use the bidirectional
LSP formats and procedures defined in [RFC3473]. The C-Type of the LSP formats and procedures defined in [RFC3473]. The C-Type of the
UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST match the C-Type of the SENDER_TSPEC UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST match the C-Type of the SENDER_TSPEC
object used in the Path message. The contents of the object used in the Path message. The contents of the
UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST be constructed using a format and UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST be constructed using a format and
procedures consistent with those used to construct the FLOWSPEC procedures consistent with those used to construct the FLOWSPEC
skipping to change at page 6, line 49 skipping to change at page 6, line 49
upstream label and the resource allocation procedure defined in upstream label and the resource allocation procedure defined in
Section 3.1 of [RFC3473]. Consistent with [RFC3473], a node that is Section 3.1 of [RFC3473]. Consistent with [RFC3473], a node that is
unable to allocate a label or internal resources based on the unable to allocate a label or internal resources based on the
contents of the UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST issue a PathErr message contents of the UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object MUST issue a PathErr message
with a "Routing problem/MPLS label allocation failure" indication. with a "Routing problem/MPLS label allocation failure" indication.
2.2. UPSTREAM_TSPEC Object 2.2. UPSTREAM_TSPEC Object
The format of an UPSTREAM_TSPEC object is the same as a SENDER_TSPEC The format of an UPSTREAM_TSPEC object is the same as a SENDER_TSPEC
object. This includes the definition of class types and their object. This includes the definition of class types and their
formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object is TBA by formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object is 121 (of
IANA (of the form 0bbbbbbb). the form 0bbbbbbb).
2.2.1. Procedures 2.2.1. Procedures
The UPSTREAM_TSPEC object describes the traffic flow that originates The UPSTREAM_TSPEC object describes the traffic flow that originates
at the egress. The UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be included in any at the egress. The UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be included in any
Resv message that corresponds to a Path message containing an Resv message that corresponds to a Path message containing an
UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. The C-Type of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. The C-Type of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object
MUST match the C-Type of the corresponding UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. MUST match the C-Type of the corresponding UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object.
The contents of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be constructed using a The contents of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be constructed using a
format and procedures consistent with those used to construct the format and procedures consistent with those used to construct the
skipping to change at page 7, line 33 skipping to change at page 7, line 33
issue a Path message with an updated UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object to issue a Path message with an updated UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object to
modify the resources requested for the upstream traffic flow. This modify the resources requested for the upstream traffic flow. This
modification might require the LSP to be re-routed, and in extreme modification might require the LSP to be re-routed, and in extreme
cases might result in the LSP being torn down when sufficient cases might result in the LSP being torn down when sufficient
resources are not available along the path of the LSP. resources are not available along the path of the LSP.
2.3. UPSTREAM_ADSPEC Object 2.3. UPSTREAM_ADSPEC Object
The format of an UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object is the same as an ADSPEC The format of an UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object is the same as an ADSPEC
object. This includes the definition of class types and their object. This includes the definition of class types and their
formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object is TBA by formats. The class number of the UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object is 122 (of
IANA (of the form 0bbbbbbb). the form 0bbbbbbb).
2.3.1. Procedures 2.3.1. Procedures
The UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object MAY be included in any Resv message that The UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object MAY be included in any Resv message that
corresponds to a Path message containing an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. corresponds to a Path message containing an UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object.
The C-Type of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be consistent with the The C-Type of the UPSTREAM_TSPEC object MUST be consistent with the
C-Type of the corresponding UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. The contents C-Type of the corresponding UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC object. The contents
of the UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object MUST be constructed using a format and of the UPSTREAM_ADSPEC object MUST be constructed using a format and
procedures consistent with those used to construct the ADSPEC object procedures consistent with those used to construct the ADSPEC object
that will be used for the LSP, e.g., [RFC2210] or [RFC6003]. The that will be used for the LSP, e.g., [RFC2210] or [RFC6003]. The
skipping to change at page 11, line 7 skipping to change at page 11, line 7
bandwidth, three new objects are defined. Each of these objects is bandwidth, three new objects are defined. Each of these objects is
defined with class numbers in the form 0bbbbbbb. Per [RFC2205], defined with class numbers in the form 0bbbbbbb. Per [RFC2205],
nodes not supporting this extension will not recognize the new class nodes not supporting this extension will not recognize the new class
numbers and will respond with an "Unknown Object Class" error. The numbers and will respond with an "Unknown Object Class" error. The
error message will propagate to the ingress, which can then take error message will propagate to the ingress, which can then take
action to avoid the path with the incompatible node or can simply action to avoid the path with the incompatible node or can simply
terminate the session. terminate the session.
5. IANA Considerations 5. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to release the Experimental Review code points The IANA has made the assignments described below in the "Class
allocated by RFC5467 and assigne code points from the Standrads Names, Class Numbers, and Class Types" section of the "RSVP
Action range from the objects defined in this document.
The IANA is requested to make the assignments described below in the
"Class Names, Class Numbers, and Class Types" section of the "RSVP
PARAMETERS" registry. PARAMETERS" registry.
5.1. UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC Object 5.1. UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC Object
A new class named UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC has to be created in the 0bbbbbbb A new class named UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC has been created in the 0bbbbbbb
range with the following definition: range (120) with the following definition:
Class Types or C-types: Class Types or C-types:
Same values as FLOWSPEC object (C-Num 9) Same values as FLOWSPEC object (C-Num 9)
5.2. UPSTREAM_TSPEC Object 5.2. UPSTREAM_TSPEC Object
A new class named UPSTREAM_TSPEC has to be created in the 0bbbbbbb A new class named UPSTREAM_TSPEC has been created in the 0bbbbbbb
range with the following definition: range (121) with the following definition:
Class Types or C-types: Class Types or C-types:
Same values as SENDER_TSPEC object (C-Num 12) Same values as SENDER_TSPEC object (C-Num 12)
5.3. UPSTREAM_ADSPEC Object 5.3. UPSTREAM_ADSPEC Object
A new class named UPSTREAM_ADSPEC has to be created in the 0bbbbbbb A new class named UPSTREAM_ADSPEC has been created in the 0bbbbbbb
range with the following definition: range (122) with the following definition:
Class Types or C-types: Class Types or C-types:
Same values as ADSPEC object (C-Num 13) Same values as ADSPEC object (C-Num 13)
6. Security Considerations 6. Security Considerations
This document introduces new message objects for use in GMPLS This document introduces new message objects for use in GMPLS
signaling [RFC3473] -- specifically the UPSTREAM_TSPEC, signaling [RFC3473] -- specifically the UPSTREAM_TSPEC,
UPSTREAM_ADSPEC, and UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC objects. These objects UPSTREAM_ADSPEC, and UPSTREAM_FLOWSPEC objects. These objects
 End of changes. 11 change blocks. 
21 lines changed or deleted 17 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/