--- 1/draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-04.txt 2020-01-29 07:13:35.454216759 -0800 +++ 2/draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-05.txt 2020-01-29 07:13:35.494217778 -0800 @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ COSE Working Group M. Jones Internet-Draft Microsoft -Intended status: Standards Track January 26, 2020 -Expires: July 29, 2020 +Intended status: Standards Track January 29, 2020 +Expires: August 1, 2020 COSE and JOSE Registrations for WebAuthn Algorithms - draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-04 + draft-ietf-cose-webauthn-algorithms-05 Abstract The W3C Web Authentication (WebAuthn) specification and the FIDO Alliance Client to Authenticator Protocol (CTAP) specification use CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) algorithm identifiers. This specification registers the following algorithms in the IANA "COSE Algorithms" registry, which are used by WebAuthn and CTAP implementations: RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 using SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, and SHA-1, and ECDSA using the secp256k1 curve and SHA-256. It @@ -31,21 +31,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on July 29, 2020. + This Internet-Draft will expire on August 1, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -415,24 +415,20 @@ [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC6194] Polk, T., Chen, L., Turner, S., and P. Hoffman, "Security Considerations for the SHA-0 and SHA-1 Message-Digest Algorithms", RFC 6194, DOI 10.17487/RFC6194, March 2011, . - [RFC7049] Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object - Representation (CBOR)", RFC 7049, DOI 10.17487/RFC7049, - October 2013, . - [RFC7515] Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web Signature (JWS)", RFC 7515, DOI 10.17487/RFC7515, May 2015, . [RFC7517] Jones, M., "JSON Web Key (JWK)", RFC 7517, DOI 10.17487/RFC7517, May 2015, . [RFC7518] Jones, M., "JSON Web Algorithms (JWA)", RFC 7518, DOI 10.17487/RFC7518, May 2015, @@ -525,31 +521,35 @@ Thanks to Stephen Farrell, John Fontana, Jeff Hodges, Kevin Jacobs, J.C. Jones, Benjamin Kaduk, Neil Madden, John Mattsson, Tony Nadalin, Matt Palmer, Jim Schaad, Goeran Selander, Wendy Seltzer, Sean Turner, and Samuel Weiler for their roles in registering these algorithm identifiers. Document History [[ to be removed by the RFC Editor before publication as an RFC ]] + -05 + + o Removed unused reference to RFC 7049. + -04 o Added explanatory comments on design decisions made that were discussed on the mailing list that Jim Schaad requested be added to the draft. -03 - o Addressed review of -02 by Jim Schaad. -02 + o Addressed working group last call comments. Thanks to J.C. Jones, Kevin Jacobs, Jim Schaad, Neil Madden, and Benjamin Kaduk for their useful feedback. -01 o Changed the JOSE curve identifier from "P-256K" to "secp256k1". o Specified that secp256k1 signing is done using the SHA-256 hash function.