--- 1/draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-07.txt 2016-07-06 03:16:40.238495784 -0700 +++ 2/draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-08.txt 2016-07-06 03:16:40.338498294 -0700 @@ -1,21 +1,21 @@ ECRIT R. Gellens -Internet-Draft Qualcomm Technologies, Inc +Internet-Draft Consultant Intended status: Standards Track B. Rosen -Expires: August 22, 2016 NeuStar, Inc. +Expires: January 7, 2017 NeuStar, Inc. H. Tschofenig - (Individual) - February 19, 2016 + Individual + July 6, 2016 Next-Generation Vehicle-Initiated Emergency Calls - draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-07.txt + draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-08.txt Abstract This document describes how to use IP-based emergency services mechanisms to support the next generation of emergency calls placed by vehicles (automatically in the event of a crash or serious incident, or manually invoked by a vehicle occupant) and conveying vehicle, sensor, and location data related to the crash or incident. Such calls are often referred to as "Automatic Crash Notification" (ACN), or "Advanced Automatic Crash Notification" (AACN), even in the @@ -27,143 +27,165 @@ (often referred to as "crash data" even though there is not necessarily a crash). An external specification for the data format, contents, and structure are referenced in this document. This document reuses the technical aspects of next-generation pan- European eCall (a mandated and standardized system for emergency calls by in-vehicle systems within Europe and other regions). However, this document specifies a different set of vehicle (crash) data, specifically, the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) rather than the eCall Minimum Set of Data (MSD). This document is an extension - of the eCall document, with the differences being that this document - makes the MSD data set optional and VEDS mandatory. This document - also discusses legacy (curcuit-switched) ACN systems and their - migration to next-generation emergency calling. + of the eCall document, with the primary differences being that this + document makes the MSD data set optional and VEDS mandatory, and + extends the eCall metadata/control object to permit greater + functionality. This document also describes legacy (circuit- + switched) ACN systems and their migration to next-generation + emergency calling, to provide background information and context. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on August 22, 2016. + This Internet-Draft will expire on January 7, 2017. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3. Document Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 4. Overview of Legacy Deployment Models . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 5. Migration to Next-Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 6. Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 7. Call Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 8. Call Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 9. Test Calls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 10. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 12. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 13. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 13.1. MIME Content-type Registration for - 'application/EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' . . . . . . . . . . 22 - 13.2. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call - Additional Data registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 - 14. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 - 15. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 - 16. Changes from Previous Versions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 - 16.1. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 . . . . . . 23 - 16.2. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 . . . . . . 24 - 16.3. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 . . . . . . 24 - 16.4. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 . . . . . . 24 - 16.5. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 . . . . . . 24 - 16.6. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 . . . . . . 24 - 16.7. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to draft-ietf-00 . . . . . 24 - 16.8. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 . . . . . . . . . . 24 - 16.9. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 . . . . . . . . . . 25 - 17. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 - 17.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 - 17.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 - Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 + 2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 3. Document Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 + 4. Overview of Legacy Deployment Models . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 + 5. Migration to Next-Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 + 6. Call Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 + 6.1. Call Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 + 7. eCall Metadata/Control Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 + 7.1. New values for the 'action' attribute' . . . . . . . . . 17 + 7.2. element extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 + 7.3. The element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 + 7.4. element extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 + 8. Test Calls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 + 9. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 + 10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 + 11. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 + 12. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 + 12.1. MIME Content-type Registration for + 'application/EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' . . . . . . . . . . 31 + + 12.2. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call + Additional Data registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 + 12.3. Additions to the eCall Control Extension Registry . . . 32 + 12.4. eCall Action Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 + 12.5. eCall Static Message Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 + 12.6. eCall Reason Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 + 12.7. eCall Lamp ID Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 + 12.8. eCall Camera ID Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 + 13. eCall Control Block Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 + 14. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 + 15. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 + 16. Changes from Previous Versions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 + 16.1. Changes from draft-ietf-07 to draft-ietf-08 . . . . . . 41 + 16.2. Changes from draft-ietf-06 to draft-ietf-07 . . . . . . 42 + 16.3. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 . . . . . . 42 + 16.4. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 . . . . . . 42 + 16.5. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 . . . . . . 42 + 16.6. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 . . . . . . 42 + 16.7. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 . . . . . . 42 + 16.8. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 . . . . . . 42 + 16.9. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to draft-ietf-00 . . . . . 43 + 16.10. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 . . . . . . . . . . 43 + 16.11. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 . . . . . . . . . . 43 + 17. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 + 17.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 + 17.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 + Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 1. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. This document re-uses terminology defined in Section 3 of [RFC5012]. Additionally, we use the following abbreviations: +--------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | Term | Expansion | +--------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | 3GPP | 3rd Generation Partnership Project | | AACN | Advanced Automatic Crash Notification | | ACN | Automatic Crash Notification | | APCO | Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials | | EENA | European Emergency Number Association | | ESInet | Emergency Services IP network | - | GNSS | Global Satellite Navigation System (which includes the | - | | various such systems including the Global Positioning | - | | System or GPS) | + | GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System (which includes | + | | various systems such as the Global Positioning System or | + | | GPS) | | IVS | In-Vehicle System | | MNO | Mobile Network Operator | + | MSD | eCall Minimum Set of Data | | NENA | National Emergency Number Association | + | POTS | Plain Old Telephone Service (normal, circuit-switched | + | | voice calls) | + | PSAP | Public Safety Answering Point | | TSP | Telematics Service Provider | | VEDS | Vehicle Emergency Data Set | +--------+----------------------------------------------------------+ 2. Introduction - Emergency calls made by in-vehicle systems (e.g., in the event of a - crash) assist in significantly reducing road deaths and injuries by - allowing emergency services to respond quickly and often with better - location. + Emergency calls made by in-vehicle systems (e.g., automatically in + the event of a crash or serious incident or manually by a vehicle + occupant) assist in significantly reducing road deaths and injuries + by allowing emergency services to respond quickly and appropriately + to the specifics of the incident, often with better location + accuracy. Drivers often have a poor location awareness, especially outside of major cities, at night and when away from home (especially abroad). In the most crucial cases, the victim(s) might not be able to call because they have been injured or trapped. - For more than a decade, some vehicles have been equipped with + For more than two decades, some vehicles have been equipped with telematics systems that, among other features, place an emergency call automatically in the event of a crash or manually in response to an emergency call button. Such systems generally have on-board location determination systems that make use of satellite-based - positioning technology, inertial sensors, gyroscopes, etc., to - provide a fairly accurate position for the vehicle. Such built-in - systems can take advantage of the benefits of being integrated into a - vehicle, such as more reliable power, ability to have larger or + positioning technology, inertial sensors, gyroscopes, etc., which can + provide an accurate position for the vehicle. Such built-in systems + can take advantage of the benefits of being integrated into a + vehicle, such as more power capacity, ability to have larger or specialized antenna, ability to be engineered to avoid or minimise degradation by vehicle glass coatings, interference from other vehicle systems, etc. Thus, the PSAP can be provided with a good estimate of where the vehicle is during an emergency. Vehicle manufacturers are increasingly adopting such systems, both for the safety benefits and for the additional features and services they enable (e.g., remote engine diagnostics, remote door unlock, stolen vehicle tracking and disabling, etc.). The general term for such systems is Automatic Crash Notification @@ -172,332 +194,370 @@ amount of data specific to the incident, referred to generally as "crash data" (the term is commonly used even though there might not have been a crash). While different systems transmit different amounts of crash data, standardized formats, structures, and mechanisms are needed to provide interoperability among systems and PSAPs. As of the date of this document, currently deployed in-vehicle telematics systems are circuit-switched and lack a standards-based ability to convey crash data directly to the PSAP (generally relying - on either a human call taker or an automated system to provide the - PSAP call taker with some crash data orally, or possibly a - proprietary mechanism). The PSAP call taker needs to first realize - that the call is related to a vehicle incident, and in most cases - must then listen to the data and transcribe it. + on either a human advisor or an automated text-to-speech system to + provide the PSAP call taker with some crash data orally, or in some + cases via a proprietary mechanism). In most cases, the PSAP call + taker needs to first realize that the call is related to a vehicle + incident, and then listen to the data and transcribe it. Circuit- + switched ACN systems are referred to here as CS-ACN. The transition to next-generation calling in general, and emergency calling in particular, provides an opportunity to vastly improve the scope, breadth, reliability and usefulness of crash data during an - emergency by allowing it to be presented alongside the call, and to + emergency by allowing it to be transmitted during call set-up, and to be automatically processed by the PSAP and made available to the call - taker in an integrated, automated way. In addition, vehicle + taker in an integrated, automated way, as well as provide the ability + for a PSAP call taker to request that a vehicle take certain actions, + such as flashing lights or unlocking doors. In addition, vehicle manufacturers are provided an opportunity to take advantage of the - same standardized mechanisms for data transmission for internal use - if they wish (such as telemetry between the vehicle and a service - center for both emergency and non-emergency uses, including location- - based services, multi-media entertainment systems, and road-side - assistance applications). + same standardized mechanisms for data transmission and request + processing for internal use if they wish (such as telemetry between + the vehicle and a service center for both emergency and non-emergency + uses, including location-based services, multi-media entertainment + systems, remote door unlocking, and road-side assistance + applications). Next-generation ACN provides an opportunity for such calls to be - recognized and processed as such during call set-up, and optionally - routed to an upgraded PSAP where the vehicle data is available to - assist the call taker in assessing and responding to the situation. + recognized and processed as such during call set-up, and routed to an + equipped PSAP where the vehicle data is available to assist the call + taker in assessing and responding to the situation. Next-generation + (IP-based) ACN systems are referred to here as NG-ACN. - An ACN call can be either occupant-initiated or automatically - triggered. (The "A" in "ACN" does stand for "Automatic," but the - term is often used to refer to the class of calls that are placed by - an in-vehicle system (IVS) and that carry incident-related data as - well as voice.) Automatically triggered calls indicate a car crash - or some other serious incident (e.g., a fire) and carry a greater - presumption of risk of injury. Manually triggered calls are often - reports of serious hazards (such as impaired drivers or roadway - debris) and might require different responses depending on the - situation. Manually triggered calls are also more likely to be false - (e.g., accidental) calls and so might be subject to different - operational handling by the PSAP. + An ACN call can initiated by a vehicle occupant or automatically + initiated by vehicle systems in the event of a serious incident. + (The "A" in "ACN" does stand for "Automatic," but the term is broadly + used to refer to the class of calls that are placed by an in-vehicle + system (IVS) or Telematics Service Providers (TSP) and that carry + incident-related data as well as voice.) Automatically triggered + calls indicate a car crash or some other serious incident (e.g., a + fire). Manually triggered calls are often reports of observed + crashes or serious hazards (such as impaired drivers or roadway + debris). Depending on the design, manually triggered calls might be + more likely to be accidental. This document describes how the IETF mechanisms for IP-based emergency calls, including [RFC6443] and [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], are used to provide the realization of next-generation ACN. This document reuses the technical aspects of next-generation pan- European eCall (a mandated and standardized system for emergency calls by in-vehicle systems within Europe and other regions), as described in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. However, this document specifies a different set of vehicle (crash) data, specifically, the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) rather than the eCall Minimum Set of Data (MSD). This document is an extension of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], with the differences being that this document - makes the MSD data set optional and VEDS mandatory. + makes the MSD data set optional and VEDS mandatory, and adds + extension elements, attributes, and values to the eCall metadata/ + control object defined in that document. The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) have jointly developed a standardized set of incident-related vehicle data for ACN use, called the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) [VEDS]. Such data is often referred to as crash data although it is applicable in incidents other than crashes. VEDS provides a standard data set for the transmission, exchange, and interpretation of vehicle-related data. A standard data format - allows the data to be generated by an IVS, and interpreted by PSAPs, - emergency responders, and medical facilities (including those capable - of providing trauma level patient care). It includes incident- - related information such as airbag deployment, location of the - vehicle, if the vehicle was involved in a rollover, various sensor - data that can indicate the potential severity of the crash and the - likelihood of severe injuries to the vehicle occupants, etc. This - data better informs the PSAP and emergency responders as to the type - of response that might be needed. This information was recently - included in the federal guidelines for field triage of injured - patients. These guidelines are designed to help responders at the - accident scene identify the potential existence of severe internal - injuries and to make critical decisions about how and where a patient - needs to be transported. + allows the data to be generated by an IVS or TSP and interpreted by + PSAPs, emergency responders, and medical facilities. It includes + incident-related information such as airbag deployment, location and + compass orientation of the vehicle, spatial orientation of the + vehicle (e.g., upright, on its side or top or a bumper), various + sensor data that can indicate the potential severity of the crash and + the likelihood of severe injuries to the vehicle occupants, etc. + This data better informs the PSAP and emergency responders as to the + type of response that might be needed. Some of this information has + been included in U.S. government guidelines for field triage of + injured patients [triage-2008] [triage-2011]. These guidelines are + designed to help responders identify the potential existence of + severe internal injuries and to make critical decisions about how and + where a patient needs to be transported. This document registers the 'application/EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml' MIME content-type, and registers the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry. - VEDS is an XML structure (see [VEDS]). The 'application/ - EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml' MIME content-type is used to identify it. - The 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry is - used to construct a 'purpose' parameter value for conveying VEDS data - in a Call-Info header (as described in - [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]). + VEDS is an XML structure (see [VEDS]) transported in SIP using the + 'application/EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml' MIME content-type. The + 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry is used + to construct a 'purpose' parameter value to indicate VEDS data in a + Call-Info header (as described in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]). VEDS is a versatile structure that can accomodate varied needs. However, if additional sets of data are determined to be needed (e.g., in the future or in different regions), the steps to enable each data block are very briefly summarized below: o A standardized format and encoding (such as XML) is defined and published by a Standards Development Organization (SDO) o A MIME Content-Type is registered for it (typically under the 'Application' media type) with a sub-type starting with 'EmergencyCallData.' o An entry for the block is added to the Emergency Call Additional Data Blocks sub-registry (established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]); the registry entry is the root of the MIME sub-type (not including the 'EmergencyCallData' prefix and any suffix such as '+xml') - A next-generation In-Vehicle System (IVS) transmits crash data by - encoding it in a standardized and registered format (such as VEDS) - and attaching it to an INVITE as a MIME body part. The body part is - identified by its MIME content-type (such as 'application/ + A next-generation In-Vehicle System (IVS) or TSP transmits crash data + by encoding it in a standardized and registered format (such as VEDS) + and attaching it to a SIP message as a MIME body part. The body part + is identified by its MIME content-type (such as 'application/ EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml') in the Content-Type header field of the body part. The body part is assigned a unique identifier which is - listed in a Content-ID header field in the body part. The INVITE is - marked as containing the crash data by adding a Call-Info header - field at the top level of the INVITE. This Call-Info header field - contains a CID URL referencing the body part's unique identifier, and - a 'purpose' parameter identifying the data as the crash data per the - registry entry; the 'purpose' parameter's value is - 'EmergencyCallData.' and the root of the MIME type (the - 'EmergencyCallData' prefix is not repeated), omitting any suffix such - as '+xml' (e.g., 'purpose=EmergencyCallData.VEDS'). + listed in a Content-ID header field in the body part. The SIP + message is marked as containing the crash data by adding a Call-Info + header field at the top level of the message. This Call-Info header + field contains a CID URL referencing the body part's unique + identifier, and a 'purpose' parameter identifying the data as the + crash data per the registry entry. The 'purpose' parameter's value + is 'EmergencyCallData.' plus the value associated with the data type + in the registry; for VEDS data, "purpose=EmergencyCallData.VEDS". These mechanisms are thus used to place emergency calls that are identifiable as ACN calls and that carry one or more standardized crash data objects in an interoperable way. + Calls by in-vehicle systems are placed via cellular networks, which + might ignore location sent by an originating device in an emergency + call INVITE, instead attaching their own location (often determined + in cooperation with the originating device). Standardized crash data + structures often include location as determined by the IVS. A + benefit of this is that it allows the PSAP to see both the location + as determined by the cellular network (often in cooperation with the + originating device) and the location as determined by the IVS. + + This specification inherits the ability to utilize test call + functionality from Section 15 of [RFC6881]. + 3. Document Scope - This document is focused on the interface to the PSAP, that is, how - an ACN emergency call is setup and incident-related data (including - vehicle, sensor, and location data) is transmitted to the PSAP using - IETF specifications. (The goal is to re-use specifications rather - than to invent new.) For the direct model, this is the end-to-end - description (between the vehicle and the PSAP). For the TSP model, - this describes the right-hand side (between the TSP and the PSAP), - leaving the left-hand side (between the vehicle and the TSP) up to - the entities involved (i.e., IVS and TSP vendors) who are then free - to use the same mechanism as for the right-hand side (or not). + This document is focused on how an ACN emergency call is setup and + incident-related data (including vehicle, sensor, and location data) + is transmitted to the PSAP using IETF specifications. For the direct + model, this is the end-to-end description (between the vehicle and + the PSAP). For the TSP model, this describes the call leg between + the TSP and the PSAP, leaving the call leg between the vehicle and + the TSP up to the entities involved (i.e., IVS and TSP vendors) who + are then free to use the same mechanism as for the right-hand side or + not. - Note that while ACN systems in the U.S. and other regions are not - currently (as of the date of this document) mandated, Europe has a - mandated and standardized system for emergency calls by in-vehicle - systems. This pan-European system is known as "eCall" and is the - subject of a separate document, [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which this - document build on. Vehicles designed to operate in multiple regions - might need to support eCall as well as the ACN described here. If - other regions devise their own specifications or data formats, a - multi-region vehicle might need to support those as well. This - document adopts the call set-up and other technical aspects of - [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which uses [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], - which makes it easy to substitute a different data set while keeping - other technical aspects unchanged. Hence, both NG-eCall and the NG- - ACN mechanism described here are fully compatible, differing only in - the specific data block that is sent (the eCall MSD in the case of - NG-eCall, and the APCO/NENA VEDS used in this document). If other - regions adopt their own data set, this can be similarly accomodated - without changing other technical aspects. + Note that Europe has a mandated and standardized system for emergency + calls by in-vehicle systems. This pan-European system is known as + "eCall" and is the subject of a separate document, + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which this document builds on. Vehicles + designed to operate in multiple regions might need to support eCall + as well as the ACN described here. In this case, a vehicle IVS might + determine whether to use eCall or ACN by first determining a region + or country in which it is located (e.g., from a GNSS location fix + and/or identity of or information from an MNO). If other regions + adopt other data formats, a multi-region vehicle might need to + support those as well. This document adopts the call set-up and + other technical aspects of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which uses + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]; this makes it straightforward to + use a different data set while keeping other technical aspects + unchanged. Hence, both NG-eCall and the NG-ACN mechanism described + here are compatible, differing primarily in the specific data block + that is sent (the eCall MSD in the case of NG-eCall, and the APCO/ + NENA VEDS used in this document), and some additions to the metadata/ + control data block. If other regions adopt their own vehicle data + sets, this can be similarly accomodated without changing other + technical aspects. 4. Overview of Legacy Deployment Models Legacy (circuit-switched) systems for placing emergency calls by in- - vehicle systems, including automatic crash notification systems, - generally have some ability to convey at least location and in some - cases telematics data to the PSAP. Most such systems use one of - three architectural models, which are described here as: "Telematics - Service Provider" (TSP), "direct", and "paired". These three models - are illustrated below. + vehicle systems generally have some ability to convey at least + location and in some cases telematics data to the PSAP. Most such + systems use one of three architectural models, which are described + here as: "Telematics Service Provider" (TSP), "direct", and "paired". + These three models are illustrated below. In the TSP model, both emergency and non-emergency calls are placed to a Telematics Service Provider (TSP); a proprietary technique is - used for data transfer (such as proprietary in-band modems) to the - TSP. + used for data transfer (such as a proprietary in-band modem) between + the TSP and the vehicle. - In an emergency, the TSP call taker bridges in the PSAP and + In an emergency, generally the TSP call taker bridges in the PSAP and communicates location, crash data (such as impact severity and trauma prediction), and other data (such as the vehicle description) to the - PSAP call taker verbally. Since the TSP knows the location of the - vehicle (from on-board GNSS), location-based routing is usually used - to route to the appropriate PSAP. In some cases, the TSP is able to - transmit location automatically, using similar techniques as for - wireless calls. Typically, a three-way voice call is established + PSAP call taker verbally (in some cases, a proprietary out-of-band + interface is used). Since the TSP knows the location of the vehicle + (from on-board GNSS and sensors), location-based routing is usually + used to route to the appropriate PSAP. In some cases, the TSP is + able to transmit location automatically, using similar techniques as + for wireless calls. Typically, a three-way voice call is established between the vehicle, the TSP, and the PSAP, allowing communication between the PSAP call taker, the TSP call taker, and the vehicle occupants (who might be unconscious). - ///----\\\ proprietary +------+ 911 trunk +------+ - ||| IVS |||-------------->+ TSP +------------------>+ PSAP | - \\\----/// crash data +------+ +------+ + ///----\\\ proprietary +------+ 911 trunk or POTS +------+ + ||| IVS |||-------------->+ TSP +------------------->+ PSAP | + \\\----/// crash data +------+ location via trunk +------+ Figure 1: Legacy TSP Model. In the paired model, the IVS uses a Bluetooth link with a previously- paired handset to establish an emergency call with the PSAP (by - dialing a standard emergency number such as 9-1-1), and then - communicates location data to the PSAP via text-to-speech; crash data - might or might not be conveyed also using text-to-speech in an - initial voice greeting. Some such systems use an automated voice - prompt menu for the PSAP call taker (e.g., "this is an automatic - emergency call from a vehicle; press 1 to open a voice path to the - vehicle; press 2 to hear the location read out") to allow the call - taker to request location data via text-to-speech. + dialing a standard emergency number; 9-1-1 in North America), and + then communicates location data to the PSAP via text-to-speech; crash + data might or might not be conveyed also using text-to-speech. Some + such systems use an automated voice prompt menu for the PSAP call + taker (e.g., "this is an automatic emergency call from a vehicle; + press 1 to open a voice path to the vehicle; press 2 to hear the + location read out") to allow the call taker to request location data + via text-to-speech. +---+ ///----\\\ | H | 911/etc voice call via handset +------+ ||| IVS |||-->| S +----------------------------------->+ PSAP | \\\----/// +---+ location via text-to-speech +------+ Figure 2: Legacy Paired Model In the direct model, the IVS directly places an emergency call with - the PSAP by dialing a standard emergency number such as 9-1-1. Such - systems might communicate location data to the PSAP via text-to- - speech; crash data might or might not be conveyed using text-to- - speech in an initial voice greeting. Some such systems use an - automated voice prompt menu (e.g., "this is an automatic emergency - call from a vehicle; press 1 to open a voice path to the vehicle; - press 2 to hear the location read out") to allow the call taker to - request location data via text-to-speech. + the PSAP by dialing a standard emergency number (9-1-1 in North + America). Such systems might communicate location data to the PSAP + via text-to-speech; crash data might or might not be conveyed using + text-to-speech. Some such systems use an automated voice prompt menu + (e.g., "this is an automatic emergency call from a vehicle; press 1 + to open a voice path to the vehicle; press 2 to hear the location + read out") to allow the call taker to request location data via text- + to-speech. ///----\\\ 911/etc voice call via IVS +------+ ||| IVS |||---------------------------------------->+ PSAP | \\\----/// location via text-to-speech +------+ Figure 3: Legacy Direct Model 5. Migration to Next-Generation Migration of emergency calls placed by in-vehicle systems to next- - generation (all-IP) technology provides a standardized mechanism to - identify such calls and to present crash data with the call, as well - as enabling additional communications modalities and enhanced - functionality. This allows ACN calls and crash data to be - automatically processed by the PSAP and made available to the call - taker in an integrated, automated way. Because the crash data is - carried in the initial SIP INVITE (per + generation (all-IP) technology per this document provides a + standardized mechanism to identify such calls and to present crash + data with the call, as well as enabling additional communications + modalities and enhanced functionality. This allows ACN calls and + crash data to be automatically processed by the PSAP and made + available to the call taker in an integrated, automated way. Because + the crash data is carried in the initial SIP INVITE (per [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]) the PSAP can present it to the call - taker simultaneously with the appearance of the call. + taker simultaneously with the appearance of the call. The PSAP can + also process the data to take other actions (e.g., if multiple calls + from the same location arrive when the PSAP is busy and a subset of + them are NG-ACN calls, a PSAP might choose to store the information + and reject the calls, since the IVS will receive confirmation that + the information has been successfully received; a PSAP could also + choose to include a message stating that it is aware of the incident + and responders are on the way; a PSAP could call the vehicle back + when a call taker is available). - Origination networks, PSAPs, emergency services networks, and other - telephony environments are all migrating to next-generation. This - provides opportunities for significant enhancement to - interoperability, especially for emergency calls carrying additional - data such as vehicle crash data. Note that in the U.S., a network - specifically for emergency responders is being developed. This - network, FirstNet, will be next-generation from the start, enhancing - the ability for data exchange between PSAPs and responders. + Origination devices and networks, PSAPs, emergency services networks, + and other telephony environments are migrating to next-generation. - Migration to next-generation (NG) thus provides an opportunity to + This provides opportunities for significant enhancement to + interoperability and functionality, especially for emergency calls + carrying additional data such as vehicle crash data. (In the U.S., a + network specifically for emergency responders is being developed. + This network, FirstNet, will be next-generation from the start, + enhancing the ability for data exchange between PSAPs and + responders.) + + Migration to next-generation (NG) provides an opportunity to significantly improve the handling and response to vehicle-initiated emergency calls. Such calls can be recognized as originating from a vehicle, routed to a PSAP equipped both technically and operationally to handle such calls, and the vehicle-determined location and crash data can be made available to the call taker simultaneously with the - call appearance. + call appearance. The PSAP can take advantage of enhanced + functionality, including the ability to request the vehicle to take + an action, such as sending an updated set of data, converying a + message to the occupants, flashing lights, unlocking doors, etc. Vehicle manufacturers using the TSP model can choose to take - advantage of the same mechanism to carry telematics data between the - vehicle and the TSP for both emergency and non-emergency calls as are - used to convey this data to the PSAP. + advantage of the same mechanism to carry telematics data and requests + and responses between the vehicle and the TSP for both emergency and + non-emergency calls as are used for the interface with the PSAP. A next-generation IVS establishes an emergency call using the emergency call solution as described in [RFC6443] and [RFC6881], with the difference that the Request-URI indicates an ACN type of - emergency call and a Call-Info header field indicates that vehicle - crash data is attached. When an ESInet is deployed, the MNO only - needs to recognize the call as an emergency call and route it to an - ESInet. The ESInet can recognize the call as an ACN with vehicle - data and can route the call to an NG-ACN capable PSAP. Such a PSAP - can interpret the vehicle data sent with the call and make it - available to the call taker. - - Because of the need to identify and specially process Next-Generation - ACN calls (as discussed above), [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] registers new - service URN children within the "sos" subservice. These URNs provide - a mechanism by which an NG-ACN call is identified, and differentiate - between manually and automatically triggered NG-ACN calls, which - might be subject to different treatment depending on policy. (The - two service URNs registered in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] are - urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic and urn:service:sos.ecall.manual.) + emergency call, the IVS typically does not perform routing or + location queries but relies on the carrier for this, and uses Call- + Info header fields to indicates that vehicle crash and capabilities + data is attached. When an ESInet is deployed, the MNO only needs to + recognize the call as an emergency call and route it to an ESInet. + The ESInet can recognize the call as an ACN with vehicle data and can + route the call to an NG-ACN capable PSAP. Such a PSAP can interpret + the vehicle data sent with the call and make it available to the call + taker. + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] registers new service URN children within the + "sos" subservice. These URNs request NG-ACN resources, and + differentiate between manually and automatically triggered NG-ACN + calls (which might be subject to different treatment depending on + policy). The two service URNs registered in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] + are "urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic" and + "urn:service:sos.ecall.manual". The same service URNs are used for + ACN as for eCall since in any region only one of these is supported, + making a distinction unnecessary. (Further, PSAP equipment might + support multiple data formats, allowing a PSAP to handle a vehicle + that erroneously sent the wrong data object.) Note that in North America, routing queries performed by clients outside of an ESInet typically treat all sub-services of "sos" identically to "sos" with no sub-service. However, the Request-URI header field retains the full sub-service; route and handling decisions within an ESInet or PSAP can take the sub-service into account. For example, in a region with multiple cooperating PSAPs, an NG-ACN call might be routed to a PSAP that is NG-ACN capable, or one that specializes in vehicle-related incidents. Migration of the three architectural models to next-generation (all- IP) is described below. In the TSP model, the IVS transmits crash and location data to the - TSP using either a protocol that is based on a proprietary design or - one that re-uses the mechanisms and data objects described here. In - an emergency, the TSP call taker bridges in the PSAP and the TSP - transmits crash and other data to the PSAP using the mechanisms and - data objects described here. There is a three-way call between the - vehicle, the TSP, and the PSAP, allowing communication between the - PSAP call taker, the TSP call taker, and the vehicle occupants (who - might be unconscious). + TSP either by re-using the mechanisms and data objects described + here, or using a proprietary mechanism. In an emergency, the TSP + bridges in the PSAP and the TSP transmits crash and other data to the + PSAP using the mechanisms and data objects described here. There is + a three-way call between the vehicle, the TSP, and the PSAP, allowing + communication between the PSAP call taker, the TSP call taker, and + the vehicle occupants (who might be unconscious). The TSP relays + PSAP requests and vehicle responses. proprietary ///----\\\ or standard +------+ standard +------+ ||| IVS ||| ------------------->+ TSP +------------------->+ PSAP | \\\----/// crash + other data +------+ crash + other data +------+ Figure 4: Next-Generation TSP Model The vehicle manufacturer and the TSP can choose to use the same - mechanisms and data objects to transmit crash and location data from - the vehicle to the TSP as are described here to transmit such data - from to the PSAP. + mechanisms and data objects on the left call leg in Figure 4 as on + the right. (Note that the TSP model can be more difficult when the + vehicle is in a different country than the TSP (e.g., a US resident + driving in Canada or Mexico) because of the additional complexity in + choosing the correct PSAP based on vehicle location performed by a + TSP in a different country.) In the direct model, the IVS communicates crash data to the PSAP directly using the mechanisms and data objects described here. ///----\\\ NG emergency call +------+ ||| IVS |||----------------------------------------->+ PSAP | \\\----/// crash + other data +------+ Figure 5: Next-Generation Direct Model @@ -511,281 +571,585 @@ +---+ ///----\\\ (undefined) | H | standard +------+ ||| IVS |||------------------>| S +------------------->+ PSAP | \\\----/// (undefined) +---+ crash + other data +------+ Figure 6: Next-Generation Paired Model If the call is routed to a PSAP that is not capable of processing the vehicle data, the PSAP ignores (or does not receive) the vehicle - data. This is detectable by the IVS or TSP when it receives a 200 OK - to the INVITE which lacks an eCall control structure acknowledging - receipt of the data [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. The IVS or TSP then - proceeds as it would for a non-NG ACN call (e.g., verbal conveyance - of data) - -6. Profile - - In the context of emergncy calls placed by an in-vehicle system it is - assumed that the car is equipped with a built-in GNSS receiver. For - this reason only geodetic location information will be sent within an - emergency call. The following location shapes MUST be implemented: - 2d and 3d Point (see Section 5.2.1 of [RFC5491]), Circle (see - Section 5.2.3 of [RFC5491]), and Ellipsoid (see Section 5.2.7 of - [RFC5491]). The coordinate reference systems (CRS) specified in - [RFC5491] are also mandatory for this document. The - element, as defined in [RFC5962] which indicates the direction of - travel of the vehicle, is important for dispatch and hence it MUST be - included in the PIDF-LO [RFC4119]. The element specified - in [RFC5962] MUST be implemented and MAY be included. - - Calls by in-vehicle systems are placed via cellular networks, which - might ignore location sent by an originating device in an emergency - call INVITE, instead attaching their own location (often determined - in cooperation with the originating device). Standardized crash data - structures often include location as determined by the IVS. A - benefit of this is that it allows the PSAP to see both the location - as determined by the cellular network (often in cooperation with the - originating device) and the location as determined by the IVS. - - This specification inherits the ability to utilize test call - functionality from Section 15 of [RFC6881]. - -7. Call Setup - - It is important that ACN calls be easily identifiable as such at all - stages of call handling, and that automatic versus manual triggering - be known. ACN calls differ from general emergency calls in several - aspects, including the presence of standardized crash data, the fact - that the call is known to be placed by an in-vehicle system (which - has implications for PSAP operational processes), and, especially for - automatic calls, information that can indicate a likelihood of severe - injury and hence need for trauma services. Knowledge that a call is - an ACN and further that it was automatically or manually invoked - carries a range of implications about the call, the circumstances, - and the vehicle occupants. Calls by in-vehicle systems can be - considered a specific sub-class of general emergency calls and are - optimally handled by a PSAP with the technical and operational - capabilities to serve such calls. (This is especially so in - environments such as the U.S. where there are many PSAPs and where - individual PSAPs have a range of capabilities.) Technical - capabilities include the ability to recognize and process - standardized crash data. Operational capabilities include training - and processes for assessing severe injury likelihood and responding - appropriately (e.g., dispatching trauma-capable medical responders or - those trained and equipped to extract occupants from crashed vehicles - and handle gasoline or other hazardous materials, transporting - victims to a trauma center, alerting the receiving facility, etc.). + data. This is detectable by the IVS or TSP when the status response + to the INVITE (e.., 200 OK) lacks an eCall control structure + acknowledging receipt of the data [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. The IVS or + TSP then proceeds as it would for a CS-ACN call (e.g., verbal + conveyance of data) - Because ACN calls differ in significant ways from general emergency - calls, and because such calls typically generally are best handled by - PSAPs equipped technically to interpet and make use of crash data, - and operationally to handle emergency calls placed by in-vehicle - systems, [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] registers SOS sub-services. Using a - sub-service allows the call to be treated as an amergency call and - makes it readily obvious that the call is an ACN; a further child - element distinguishes calls automatically placed due to a crash or - other serious incident (such as a fire) from those manually invoked - by a vehicle occupant (specifically, "SOS.ecall.automatic" and - "SOS.ecall.manual"). The distinction between automatic and manual - invocation is also significant; automatically triggered calls - indicate a car crash or some other serious incident (e.g., a fire) - and carry a greater presumption of risk of injury and hence need for - specific responders (such as trauma or fire). Manually triggered - calls are often reports of serious hazards (such as impaired drivers - or roadway debris) and might require different responses depending on - the situation. Manually triggered calls also have a greater chance - of being false (e.g., accidental) calls and might thus be subject to - different handling by the PSAP. +6. Call Setup - A next-generation In-Vehicle System (IVS) transmits crash data by - encoding it in a standardized and registered format and attaching it - to an INVITE as an additional data block as specified in Section 4.1 - of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]. As described in that document, - the block is identified by its MIME content-type, and pointed to by a - CID URL in a Call-Info header with a 'purpose' parameter value - corresponding to the block. + A next-generation In-Vehicle System (IVS) initiates an NG-ACN call + with a SIP INVITE using one of the SOS sub-services + "SOS.ecall.automatic" or "SOS.ecall.manual" in the Request-URI, + standard sets of crash data and capabilities data encoded in + standardized and registered formats, attached as additional data + blocks as specified in Section 4.1 of + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]. As described in that document, + each data block is identified by its MIME content-type, and pointed + to by a CID URL in a Call-Info header with a 'purpose' parameter + value corresponding to the data block. - Specifically, the steps required during standardization are: + Should new data blocks be needed (e.g., in other regions or in the + future), the steps required during standardization are: - o A set of crash data is standardized by an SDO or appropriate + o A set of data is standardized by an SDO or appropriate organization o A MIME Content-Type for the crash data set is registered with IANA * If the data is specifically for use in emergency calling, the MIME type is normally under the 'application' type with a subtype starting with 'EmergencyCallData.' * If the data format is XML, then by convention the name has a suffix of '+xml' o The item is registered in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry, as defined in Section 9.1.7 of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] * For emergency-call-specific formats, the registered name is the root of the MIME Content-Type (not including the 'EmergencyCallData' prefix and any suffix such as '+xml') as - described in Section 4.1 of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] + described in Section 4.1 of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]. When placing an emergency call: o The crash data set is created and encoded per its specification - o The crash data set is attached to the emergency call INVITE as - specified in Section 4.1 of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], that - is, as a MIME body part identified by its MIME Content-Type in the - body part's Content-Type header field + o IVS capability data is encoded per the specification in + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] as extended in this document - o The body part is assigned a unique identifier label in a Content- - ID header field of the body part + o The crash data set and capabilities data are attached to the + emergency call INVITE as specified in Section 4.1 of + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], that is, as MIME body parts + identified by the MIME Content-Type in the body part's Content- + Type header field - o A Call-Info header field at the top level of the INVITE is added - that references the crash data and identifies it by its MIME root - (as registered in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry) + o Each body part is assigned a unique identifier label in the + Content-ID header field of the body part - * The crash data is referenced in the Call-Info header field by a - CID URL that contains the unique Content ID assigned to the - crash data body part + o Call-Info header fields at the top level of the INVITE are added + that reference the crash data and capabilities data and identify + each by its MIME root (as registered in the Emergency Call + Additional Data registry) - * The crash data is identified in the Call-Info header field by a - 'purpose' parameter whose value is 'EmergencyCallData.' - concatenated with the specific crash data entry in the - Emergency Call Additional Data registry + * The crash and capabilities data are referenced in Call-Info + header fields by CID URLs that contain the unique Content ID + assigned to the body part - * The Call-Info header field MAY be either solely to reference - the crash data (and hence have only the one URL) or can also + * The crash and capabilities data are identified in the Call-Info + header fields by a 'purpose' parameter whose value is + 'EmergencyCallData.' concatenated with the specific data + block's entry in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry + + * A Call-Info header field can be either solely to reference one + item of data (and hence have only the one URL) or can also contain other URLs referencing other data - o Additional crash data sets MAY be included by following the same - steps + o Any additional data sets are included by following the same steps The Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) is an XML structure defined by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) [VEDS]. The 'application/EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml' MIME content-type is used to identify it. The 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry is used to construct a 'purpose' parameter value for conveying VEDS data in a Call-Info header. The VEDS data is attached as a body part with MIME content type 'application/EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml' which is pointed at by a Call-Info URL of type CID with a 'purpose' parameter of 'EmergencyCallData.VEDS'. Entities along the path between the vehicle and the PSAP are able to identify the call as an ACN call and handle it appropriately. The PSAP is able to identify the crash data as well as any other additional data attached to the INVITE by examining the Call-Info header fields for 'purpose' parameters whose values start with - 'EmergencyCallData.' The PSAP is able to access and the data it is + 'EmergencyCallData.' The PSAP is able to access the data it is capable of handling and is interested in by checking the 'purpose' parameter values. This document extends [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] by reusing the call set- - up and other normative requirements except that in this document, - support for the eCall MSD is OPTIONAL and support for VEDS in - REQUIRED. + up and other normative requirements with the exception that in this + document, support for the eCall MSD is OPTIONAL and support for VEDS + in REQUIRED. This document also extends the metadata/control object + defined in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] by adding new elements, attributes, + and values. -8. Call Routing +6.1. Call Routing An Emergency Services IP Network (ESInet) is a network operated by or on behalf of emergency services authorities. It handles emergency call routing and processing before delivery to a PSAP. In the NG9-1-1 architecture adopted by NENA as well as the NG1-1-2 architecture adopted by EENA, each PSAP is connected to one or more ESInets. Each originating network is also connected to one or more ESInets. The ESInets maintain policy-based routing rules which control the routing and processing of emergency calls. The centralization of such rules within ESInets provides for a cleaner separation between the responsibilities of the originating network and that of the emergency services network, and provides greater flexibility and control over processing of emergency calls by the - emergency services authorities. This makes it easier to react - quickly to unusual situations that require changes in how emergency - calls are routed or handled (e.g., a natural disaster closes a PSAP), - as well as ease in making long-term changes that affect such routing - (e.g., cooperative agreements to specially handle calls requiring - translation or relay services). + emergency services authorities and PSAPs. This makes it easier to + react quickly to unusual situations that require changes in how + emergency calls are routed or handled (e.g., a natural disaster + closes a PSAP), as well as ease in making long-term changes that + affect such routing (e.g., cooperative agreements to specially handle + calls requiring translation or relay services). In an environment that uses ESInets, the originating network need only detect that the service URN of an emergency call is or starts with "sos", passing all types of emergency calls to an ESInet. The ESInet is then responsible for routing such calls to an appropriate PSAP. In an environment without an ESInet, the emergency services - authorities and the originating carriers would need to determine how - such calls are routed. + authorities and the originating carriers determine how such calls are + routed. -9. Test Calls +7. eCall Metadata/Control Extensions + + This document extends the eCall metadata/control structure defined in + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] by adding new elements, attributes, and + values. + + The element is permitted in a control block sent by the IVS + to the PSAP, to acknowledge receipt of a request by the PSAP and + indicate if the request was carried out, when that request would + not otherwise be acknowledged (if the PSAP requests the vehicle to + send data and the vehicle does so, the data serves as a success + acknowledgement). + + A new element is added; used in a control block + sent from the IVS to the PSAP (e.g., in the initial INVITE) to + inform the PSAP of the vehicle capabilities. Child elements + contain all actions and data types supported by the vehicle and + all available lamps (lights) and cameras. + + New request values are added to the element to enable + the PSAP to request the vehicle to perform actions. + + Mandatory Actions (the IVS and the PSAP MUST support): + + o Transmit data object (VEDS MUST be supported; MSD MAY be + supported) + + Optional Actions (the IVS and the PSAP MAY support): + + o Play and/or display static (pre-defined) message + o Speak/display dynamic text (text supplied in action) + o Flash or turn on or off a lamp (light) + o Honk horn + o Enable a camera + + The element indicates the object being acknowledged (i.e., a + data object or a element), and reports success or failure. + + The element has child elements to indicate + the actions supported by the IVS. + + The element contains attributes to indicate the request and + to supply any needed information, and MAY contain a child + element to contain the text for a dynamic message. The 'action' + attribute is mandatory and indicates the specific action. + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] established an IANA registry to contain the + allowed values; this document adds new values to that registry in + Table 3. + +7.1. New values for the 'action' attribute' + + The following new "action" values are defined: + + 'msg-static' displays or plays a predefined message (translated as + appropriate for the language of the vehicle's interface). A registry + is created in Section 12.5 for messages and their IDs. Vehicles + include the highest registered message in their + element to indicate support for all messages up to and including the + indicated value. + + 'msg-dynamic' displays or speaks (via text-to-speech) a dynamic + message included in the request. + + 'honk' sounds the horn. + + 'lamp' turns a lamp (light) on, off, or flashes. + + 'enable-camera' adds a one-way media stream (established via SIP re- + INVITE sent by the vehicle) to enable the PSAP call taker to view a + feed from a camera. + + Note that there is no 'request' action to play dynamic media (such as + an audio message). The PSAP can send a SIP re-INVITE to establish a + one-way media stream for this purpose. + +7.2. element extensions + + The element is extended to be transmitted by the IVS to the + PSAP to acknowledge receipt of a element that requested the + IVS to perform an action other than transmitting a data object (e.g., + a request to display a message would be acknowledged, but a request + to transmit a data object would not result in a separate + element being sent, since the data object itself serves as + acknowledgment.) An element sent by an IVS references the + unique ID of the request being acknowledged, indicates whether the + request was successfully performed, and if not, optionally includes + an explanation. + + The element has the following new child elements: + +7.2.1. New Child Element of the element + + The element has the following new child element: + + Name: actionResult + Usage: Optional + Description: An element indicates the result of an + action (other than a 'send-data' action). When an element + is in response to a control object with multiple + elements (that are not 'send-data' actions), the element + contains an element for each. + The element has the following + attributes: + + Name: action + Usage: Mandatory + Type: token + Description: Contains the value of the 'action' attribute of the + element + + Name: success + Usage: Mandatory + Type: Boolean + Description: Indicates if the action was successfully + accomplished + + Name: reason + Usage: Conditional + Type: token + Description: Used when 'success' is "False", this attribute + contains a reason code for a failure. A registry for reason + codes is defined in Section 12.6. + + Name: details + Usage: optional + Type: string + Description: Contains further explanation of the circumstances of + a success or failure. The contents are implementation-specific + and human-readable. + + Example: + + Example: + +7.2.2. Ack Examples + + + + + + + + + + + + Figure 7: Ack Example from IVS to PSAP + +7.3. The element + + The element is transmitted by the IVS to indicate to + the PSAP its capabilities. No attributes for this element are + currently defined. The following child elements are defined: + +7.3.1. Child Elements of the element + + The element has the following child elements: + + Name: request + Usage: Mandatory + Description: The element contains a child + element per action supported by the vehicle. + + Because support for a 'send-data' action is REQUIRED, a + child element with a "send-data" 'action' attribute is also + REQUIRED. The 'supported-datatypes' attribute is REQUIRED in this + element within a element, and MUST + contain at a minimum the 'VEDS' data block value; it SHOULD + contain all data blocks supported by the IVS. + + All other actions are OPTIONAL. + + If the "msg-static" action is supported, a child element + with a "msg-static" 'action' attribute is sent, with a 'msgid' + attribute set to the highest supported static message supported by + the vehicle. A registry is created in Section 12.5 to map 'msgid' + values to static text messages. By sending the highest supported + static message number in its element, the vehicle + indicates its support for all static messages in the registry up + to and including that value. + + If the "lamp" action is supported, a child element with + a "lamp" 'action' is sent, with a 'supported-lamps' attribute set + to all supported lamp IDs. + + If the "enable-camera" action is supported, a child + element with an "enable-camera" 'action' is sent, with a + 'supported-cameras' attribute set to all supported camera IDs. + + Examples: + + + + + +7.3.2. Capabilities Example + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Figure 8: Capabilities Example + +7.4. element extensions + + This document extends the element to be permitted one or + more times on its own or as a child elements of a + element. The following new attributes, values, and child elements + are defined for the element: + +7.4.1. New Attributes of the element + + The element has the following new attributes: + + Name: msgid + Usage: Conditional + Type: int + Description: Mandatory with a "msg-static" action. Indicates the + identifier of the static message to be displayed and/or spoken for + the vehicle occupants. This document establishes an IANA registry + for messages and their IDs, in Section 12.5 + Example: msgid="3" + + Name: persistance + Usage: Optional + Type: duration + Description: Specifies how long to carry on the specified action, + for example, how long to continue honking or flashing. If absent, + the default is for the duration of the ACN call. + Example: persistance="PT1H" + + Name: supported-datatypes + Usage: Conditional + Type: string + Description: Used with a 'send-data' action in a element + that is a child of a element, this attribute lists + all data blocks that the vehicle can transmit, using the same + identifier as in the 'purpose' attribute in a Call-Info header + field to point to the data block. Permitted values are contained + in the 'Emergency Call Data Types' IANA registry established in + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]. Multiple values are separated + with a semicolon. + Example: supported-datatypes="VEDS; eCall.MSD" + + Name: lamp-action + Usage: Conditional + Type: token + Description: Used with a 'lamp' action, indicates if the lamp is to + be illuminated, turned off, or flashed. Permitted values are + 'on', 'off', and 'flash'. + + Example: lamp-action="flash" + + Name: lamp-ID + Usage: Conditional + Type: token + Description: Used with a 'lamp' action, indicates which lamp the + action affects. Permitted values are contained in the registry of + lamp-ID tokens created in Section 12.7 + Example: lamp-ID="hazard" + + Name: supported-lamps + Usage: Conditional + Type: string + Description: Used with a 'lamp' action in a element that + is a child of a element, this attribute lists all + supported lamps, using values in the registry of lamp-ID tokens + created in Section 12.7. Multiple values are separated with a + semicolon. + Example: supported-lamps="head; interior; fog-front; fog-rear; + brake; position-front; position-rear; turn-left; turn-right; + hazard" + + Name: camera-ID + Usage: Conditional + Type: token + Description: Used with an 'enable-camera' action, indicates which + camera to enable. Permitted values are contained in the registry + of camera-ID tokens created in Section 12.8. When a vehicle + camera is enabled, the IVS sends a re-INVITE to negotiate a one- + way media stream for the camera. + Example: camera-ID="backup" + + Name: supported-cameras + Usage: Conditional + Type: string + Description: Used with an 'enable-camera' action in a + element that is a child of a element, this attribute + lists all cameras that the vehicle supports (can add as a video + feed in the current dialog), using the same identifiers as are + used in the 'camera-ID' attribute (contained in the camera ID + registry in Section 12.8). Multiple values are separated with a + semicolon. + Example: supported-cameras="backup; interior" + +7.4.2. New Child Elements of the element + + The element has the following new child elements: + + Name: text + Usage: Conditional + Type: string + Description: Used within a element to + contain the text to be displayed and/or spoken (via text-to- + speech) for the vehicle occupants. + Example: Emergency authorities are aware of your incident and + location. Due to a multi-vehicle incident in your area, no one is + able to speak with you right now. Please remain calm. We will + assist you soon. + +7.4.3. Request Example + + + + + + + + + Remain calm. Help is on the way. + + + + + Figure 9: Request Example + +8. Test Calls + + An NG-ACN test call is a call that is recognized and treated to some + extent as an NG-ACN call but not given emergency call treatment and + not handled by a call taker. The specific handling of test NG-ACN + calls is not itself standardized; the test call facility is intended + to allow the IVS, user, or TSP to verify that an NG-ACN call can be + successfully established with voice and/or other media communication. + The IVS might also be able to verify that the crash data was + successfully received. This document builds on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which inherits the ability to utilize test call functionality from Section 15 of - [RFC6881]. + [RFC6881]. A service URN starting with "test." indicates a test + call. [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] registered "urn:service:test.sos.ecall" + for test calls. - A service URN starting with "test." indicates a request for an - automated test. Per [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], - "urn:service:test.sos.ecall.automatic" indicates such a test feature. - This functionality is defined in [RFC6881]. + MNOs, emergency authorities, ESInets, and PSAPs determine how to + treat a vehicle call requesting the "test" service URN so that the + desired functionality is tested, but this is outside the scope of + this document. (One possibility is that MNOs route such calls as + non-emergency calls to an ESInet, which routes them to a PSAP that + supports NG-ACN calls; the PSAP accepts test calls, sends a crash + data acknowledgment, and plays an audio clip (for example, saying + that the call reached an appropriate PSAP and the vehicle data was + successfully processed) in addition to supporting media loopback per + [RFC6881]). Note that since test calls are placed using "test" as the parent service URN and "sos" as a child, such calls are not treated as an - emergency call and so some functionality will not apply (such as + emergency call and so some functionality might not apply (such as preemption or service availability for devices lacking service ("non- - service-initialized" or "NSI") if those are available for emergency - calls); this is by design. MNOs can recognize test calls and treat - them in a way that tests as much functionality as desired, but this - is outside the scope of this document. + service-initialized" or "NSI" devices) if those are available for + emergency calls). -10. Example +9. Example - Figure 7 shows an emergency call placed by a vehicle whereby location - information and VEDS crash data are both attached to the SIP INVITE - message. The INVITE has a request URI containing the - 'urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic' service URN and is thus recognized - as an ACN type of emergency call, and is also recognizable as an - emergency call because the request URI starts with 'urn:service:sos'. - The mobile network operator (MNO) routes the call to an Emergency - services IP Network (ESInet), as for any emergency call. The ESInet - processes the call as an ACN and routes the call to an appropriate - ACN-capable PSAP (using location information and the fact that that - it is an ACN). The call is processed by the Emergency Services - Routing Proxy (ESRP), as the entry point to the ESInet. The ESRP - routes the call to an appropriate ACN-capable PSAP, where the call is - received by a call taker. (In deployments where there is no ESInet, - the MNO itself routes the call directly to an appropriate ACN-capable - PSAP.) + Figure 10 shows an NG-ACN call routing. The mobile network operator + (MNO) routes the call to an Emergency services IP Network (ESInet), + as for any emergency call. The ESInet routes the call to an + appropriate NG-ACN-capable PSAP (using location information and the + fact that that it is an NG-ACN call). The call is processed by the + Emergency Services Routing Proxy (ESRP), as the entry point to the + ESInet. The ESRP routes the call to an appropriate NG-ACN-capable + PSAP, where the call is received by a call taker. (In deployments + where there is no ESInet, the MNO itself routes the call directly to + an appropriate NG-ACN-capable PSAP.) +---------------------------------------+ | | +------------+ | +-------+ | | | | | PSAP2 | | | | | +-------+ | | Originating| | | | Mobile | | +------+ +-------+ | Vehicle-->| Network |--+->| ESRP |---->| PSAP1 |--> Call-Taker | | | | +------+ +-------+ | | | | | +------------+ | +-------+ | | | PSAP3 | | | +-------+ | | | | | | | | ESInet | +---------------------------------------+ - Figure 7: Example of Vehicle-Placed Emergency Call Message Flow + Figure 10: Example of Vehicle-Placed Emergency Call Message Flow - The example, shown in Figure 8, illustrates a SIP emergency call - INVITE that is being conveyed with location information (a PIDF-LO) - and crash data (as VEDS data). + The example, shown in Figure 11, illustrates a SIP emergency call + INVITE with location information (a PIDF-LO), VEDS crash data (a VEDS + data block), and capabilities data (an eCall metadata/control block + with extensions defined in this document) attached to the SIP INVITE + message. The INVITE has a request URI containing the + 'urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic' service URN. The example VEDS data structure shows information about about a crashed vehicle. The example communicates that the car is a model year 2015 Saab 9-5 (a car which does not exist). The front airbag deployed as a consequence of the crash. The 'VehicleBodyCategoryCode' indicates that the crashed vehicle is a passenger car (the code is set to '101') and that it is not a convertible (the 'ConvertibleIndicator' value is set to 'false'). The 'VehicleCrashPulse' element provides further information about @@ -802,21 +1166,21 @@ No roll bar was deployed, as indicated in 'VehicleRollbarDeployedIndicator' being set to 'false'. Next, there is information indicating seatbelt and seat sensor data for individual seat positions in the vehicle. In our example, information from the driver seat is available (value '1' in the 'VehicleSeatLocationCategoryCode' element), that the seatbelt was monitored ('VehicleSeatbeltMonitoredIndicator' element), that the seatbelt was fastened ('VehicleSeatbeltFastenedIndicator' element) - and the seat sensor determined that the seat is occupied + and the seat sensor determined that the seat was occupied ('VehicleSeatOccupiedIndicator' element). Finally, information about the weight of the vehicle, which is 600 kilogram in our example. In addition to the information about the vehicle, further indications are provided, namely the presence of fuel leakage ('FuelLeakingIndicator' element), an indication whether the vehicle was subjected to multiple impacts ('MultipleImpactsIndicator' element), the orientation of the vehicle at final rest @@ -825,30 +1189,35 @@ 'VehicleFireIndicator' element). INVITE urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic SIP/2.0 To: urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic From: ;tag=9fxced76sl Call-ID: 3848276298220188511@atlanta.example.com Geolocation: Geolocation-Routing: no Call-Info: cid:1234567890@atlanta.example.com; purpose=EmergencyCallData.VEDS - Accept: application/sdp, application/pidf+xml + Call-Info: cid:1234567892@atlanta.example.com; + purpose=EmergencyCallData.ecall.control + Accept: application/sdp, application/pidf+xml, + application/emergencyCallData.eCall.control+xml + Recv-Info: emergencyCallData.eCall + Allow: INVITE, ACK, PRACK, INFO, OPTIONS, CANCEL, REFER, BYE, + SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, UPDATE CSeq: 31862 INVITE Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=boundary1 Content-Length: ... --boundary1 Content-Type: application/sdp ...Session Description Protocol (SDP) goes here - --boundary1 Content-Type: application/pidf+xml Content-ID: true false true Driver false + --boundary1 + Content-Type: application/EmergencyCallData.ecall.control+xml + Content-ID: 1234567892@atlanta.example.com + Content-Disposition: by-reference;handling=optional + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + --boundary1-- - Figure 8: SIP INVITE indicating a Vehicule-Initated Emergency Call + Figure 11: SIP INVITE indicating a Vehicule-Initated Emergency Call -11. Security Considerations +10. Security Considerations Since this document relies on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] and [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], the security considerations described there and in [RFC5069] apply here. Implementors are - strongly cautioned to read and understand the discussion in those - documents. + cautioned to read and understand the discussion in those documents. As with emergency service systems where location data is supplied or determined with the assistance of an end host, there is the - possibility that that location is incorrect, either intentially (in - case of an a denial of service attack against the emergency services + possibility that that location is incorrect, either intentially + (e.g., in a denial of service attack against the emergency services infrastructure) or due to a malfunctioning device. The reader is referred to [RFC7378] for a discussion of some of these vulnerabilities. -12. Privacy Considerations + In addition to the security considerations discussion specific to the + metadata/control object in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], note that vehicles + MAY decline to carry out any requested action (e.g., if the vehicle + requires but is unable to verify the certificate used to sign the + request). The vehicle MAY use any value in the reason registry to + indicate why it did not take an action (e.g., the generic "unable" or + the more specific "security-failure"). + +11. Privacy Considerations Since this document builds on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which itself builds on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data], the data structures specified there, and the corresponding privacy considerations discussed there, apply here as well. The VEDS data structure contains optional elements that can carry identifying and personal information, both about the vehicle and about the owner, as well as location information, and so needs to be protected against unauthorized disclosure, as discussed in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]. Local regulations may impose additional privacy protection requirements. -13. IANA Considerations -13.1. MIME Content-type Registration for 'application/ +12. IANA Considerations + + This document registers the 'application/EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' MIME + content type, and adds "VEDS" to the Emergency Call Additional Data + registry. This document adds to and creates new sub-registries in + the 'eCall Control Data' registry created in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. + +12.1. MIME Content-type Registration for 'application/ EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' This specification requests the registration of a new MIME type according to the procedures of RFC 4288 [RFC4288] and guidelines in RFC 3023 [RFC3023]. MIME media type name: application MIME subtype name: EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml @@ -1038,197 +1447,616 @@ Applications which use this media type: Emergency Services Additional information: None Magic Number: None File Extension: .xml Macintosh file type code: 'TEXT' - Person and email address for further information: Hannes - Tschofenig, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net + Persons and email addresses for further information: Randall + Gellensm rg+ietf (at) randy.pensive.org; Hannes Tschofenig, + Hannes.Tschofenig (at) gmx.net Intended usage: LIMITED USE Author: This specification is a work item of the IETF ECRIT working group, with mailing list address . Change controller: The IESG -13.2. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional +12.2. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional Data registry This specification requests IANA to add the 'VEDS' entry to the Emergency Call Additional Data registry, with a reference to this document. The Emergency Call Additional Data registry has been established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data]. +12.3. Additions to the eCall Control Extension Registry + + This document uses the "eCall Control Extension Registry" to add new + elements, attributes, and values to the eCall metadata/control + object, as per [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]: + + +-----------+---------------------+---------------------------------+ + | Type | Name | Description | + +-----------+---------------------+---------------------------------+ + | Attribute | msgid | See Section 7.2 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | persistance | See Section 7.2 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | supported-datatypes | See Section 7.2 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | lamp-action | See Section 7.2 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | lamp-ID | See Section 7.2 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | supported-lamps | See Section 7.2 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | camera-ID | See Section 7.2 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Element | text | See Section 7.4.2 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Element | actionResult | See Section 7.2.1 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | action | See Section 7.2.1 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | success | See Section 7.2.1 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | reason | See Section 7.2.1 of this | + | | | document | + | | | | + | Attribute | details | See Section 7.2.1 of this | + | | | document | + +-----------+---------------------+---------------------------------+ + + Table 2: eCall Control Extension Registry New Values + +12.4. eCall Action Extensions + + This document adds new values for the 'action' attribute of the + element in the "eCall Control Action Registry" registry + created by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. + + +---------------+------------------------------+ + | Name | Description | + +---------------+------------------------------+ + | msg-static | Section 7.1 of this document | + | | | + | msg-dynamic | Section 7.1 of this document | + | | | + | honk | Section 7.1 of this document | + | | | + | lamp | Section 7.1 of this document | + | | | + | enable-camera | Section 7.1 of this document | + +---------------+------------------------------+ + + Table 3: eCall Control Action Registry New Values + +12.5. eCall Static Message Registry + + This document creates a new sub-registry called "eCall Static Message + Registry" in the "eCall Control Data" registry established by + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. Because all compliant vehicles are expected + to support all static messages translated into all languages + supported by the vehicle, it is important to limit the number of such + messages. As defined in [RFC5226], this registry operates under + "Publication Required" rules, which require a stable, public document + and imply expert review of the publication. The expert should + determine that the document has been published by an appropriate + emergency services organization (e.g., NENA, EENA, APCO) or by the + IETF with input from an emergency services organization, and that the + proposed message is sufficiently distinguishable from other messages. + + The content of this registry includes: + + ID: An integer identifier to be used in the 'msgid' attribute of an + eCall control element. + + Message: The text of the message. Messages are listed in the + registry in English; vehicles are expected to implement + translations into languages supported by the vehicle. + + When new messages are added to the registry, the message text is + determined by the registrant; IANA assigns the IDs. Each message is + assigned a consecutive integer value as its ID. This allows an IVS + to indicate by a single integer value that it supports all messages + with that value or lower. + + The initial set of values is listed in Table 4. + + +----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ + | ID | Message | + +----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ + | 1 | Emergency authorities are aware of your incident and | + | | location, but are unable to speak with you right now. We | + | | will help you as soon as possible. | + +----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ + + Table 4: eCall Static Message Registry + +12.6. eCall Reason Registry + + This document creates a new sub-registry called "eCall Reason + Registry" in the "eCall Control Data" registry established by + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This new sub-registry contains values for + the 'reason' attribute of the element. As defined in + [RFC5226], this registry operates under "Expert Review" rules. The + expert should determine that the proposed reason is sufficiently + distinguishable from other reasons and that the proposed description + is understandable and correctly worded. + + The content of this registry includes: + + ID: A short string identifying the reason, for use in the 'reason' + attribute of an element. + + Description: A description of the reason. + + The initial set of values is listed in Table 5. + + +------------------+------------------------------------------------+ + | ID | Description | + +------------------+------------------------------------------------+ + | unsupported | The 'action' is not supported. | + | | | + | unable | The 'action' could not be accomplished. | + | | | + | data-unsupported | The data item referenced in a 'send-data' | + | | request is not supported. | + | | | + | security-failure | The authenticity of the request or the | + | | authority of the requestor could not be | + | | verified. | + +------------------+------------------------------------------------+ + + Table 5: eCall Reason Registry + +12.7. eCall Lamp ID Registry + + This document creates a new sub-registry called "eCall Lamp ID + Registry" in the "eCall Control Data" registry established by + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This new sub-registry standardizes the names + of automotive lamps (lights). As defined in [RFC5226], this registry + operates under "Expert Review" rules. The expert should determine + that the proposed lamp name is clearly understandable and is + sufficiently distinguishable from other lamp names. + + The content of this registry includes: + + Name: The identifier to be used in the 'lamp-ID' attribute of an + eCall control element. + + Description: A description of the lamp (light). + + The initial set of values is listed in Table 6. + + +----------------+---------------------------------------------+ + | Name | Description | + +----------------+---------------------------------------------+ + | head | The main lamps used to light the road ahead | + | | | + | interior | Interior lamp, often at the top center | + | | | + | fog-front | Front fog lamps | + | | | + | fog-rear | Rear fog lamps | + | | | + | brake | Brake indicator lamps | + | | | + | position-front | Front position/parking/standing lamps | + | | | + | position-rear | Rear position/parking/standing lamps | + | | | + | turn-left | Left turn/directional lamps | + | | | + | turn-right | Right turn/directional lamps | + | | | + | hazard | Hazard/four-way lamps | + +----------------+---------------------------------------------+ + + Table 6: eCall Lamp ID Registry Initial Values + +12.8. eCall Camera ID Registry + + This document creates a new sub-registry called "eCall Camera ID + Registry" in the "eCall Control Data" registry established by + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This new sub-registry standardizes the names + of automotive camera. As defined in [RFC5226], this registry + operates under "Expert Review" rules. The expert should determine + that the proposed camera name is clearly understandable and is + sufficiently distinguishable from other camera names. + + The content of this registry includes: + + Name: The identifier to be used in the 'camera-ID' attribute of an + eCall control element. + + Description: A description of the camera. + + The initial set of values is listed in Table 7. + + +-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ + | Name | Description | + +-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ + | backup | Shows what is behind the vehicle, e.g., often used | + | | for driver display when the vehicle is in reverse. | + | | Also known as rearview, reverse, etc. | + | | | + | left-rear | Shows view to the left and behind (e.g., left side | + | | rear-view mirror or blind spot view) | + | | | + | right-rear | Shows view to the right and behind (e.g., right | + | | side rear-view mirror or blind spot view) | + | | | + | forward | Shows what is in front of the vehicle | + | | | + | rear-wide | Shows what is behind vehicle (e.g., used by rear- | + | | collision detection systems), separate from backup | + | | view | + | | | + | lane | Used by systems to identify road lane and/or | + | | monitor vehicle's position within lane | + | | | + | interior | Shows the interior (e.g., driver) | + | | | + | night-front | Night-vision view of what is in front of the | + | | vehicle | + +-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ + + Table 7: eCall Camera ID Registry Initial Values + +13. eCall Control Block Schema + + This section presents an XML schema of the eCall control block after + applying the extensions defined in this document. Note that the text + is normative; this schema is informative. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + conditionally + mandatory when @success='false" + to indicate reason code for a + failure + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Figure 12: eCall Control Block Schema + 14. Contributors We would like to thank Ulrich Dietz for his help with earlier versions of the original version of this document. 15. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Michael Montag, Arnoud van Wijk, Ban Al-Bakri, Wes George, Gunnar Hellstrom, and Rex Buddenberg for their feedback. 16. Changes from Previous Versions -16.1. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 +16.1. Changes from draft-ietf-07 to draft-ietf-08 + + o Moved much of the metadata/control object from + [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] to this document as extensions + o Editorial clarifications and simplifications + o Moved "Call Routing" to be a subsection of "Call Setup" + o Deleted "Profile" section and moved some of its text into + "Introduction" + +16.2. Changes from draft-ietf-06 to draft-ietf-07 + + o Minor editorial changes + +16.3. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 o Added clarifying text regarding signed and encrypted data o Additional informative text in "Migration to Next-Generation" section o Additional clarifying text regarding security and privacy. -16.2. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 +16.4. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 o Reworded security text in main document and in MIME registration for the VEDS object -16.3. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 +16.5. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 o Added example VEDS object o Additional clarifications and corrections o Removed references from Abstract o Moved Document Scope section to follow Introduction -16.4. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 +16.6. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 o Additional clarifications and corrections -16.5. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 +16.7. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 o This document now refers to [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] for technical aspects including the service URN; this document no longer proposes a unique service URN for non-eCall NG-ACN calls; the same service URN is now used for all NG-ACN calls including NG-eCall and non-eCall o Added discussion of an NG-ACN call placed to a PSAP that doesn't support it o Minor wording improvements and clarifications -16.6. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 +16.8. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 o Added further discussion of test calls o Added further clarification to the document scope o Mentioned that multi-region vehicles may need to support other crash notification specifications such as eCall o Minor wording improvements and clarifications -16.7. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to draft-ietf-00 +16.9. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to draft-ietf-00 o Renamed from draft-gellens- to draft-ietf- o Added text to Introduction to clarify that during a CS ACN, the PSAP call taker usually needs to listen to the data and transcribe it -16.8. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 +16.10. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 o Fixed case of 'EmergencyCallData', in accordance with changes to [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] -16.9. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 +16.11. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 o Now using 'EmergencyCallData' for purpose parameter values and MIME subtypes, in accordance with changes to [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] o Added reference to RFC 6443 o Fixed bug that caused Figure captions to not appear 17. References 17.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-ecrit-additional-data] Gellens, R., Rosen, B., Tschofenig, H., Marshall, R., and J. Winterbottom, "Additional Data Related to an Emergency - Call", draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-37 (work in - progress), October 2015. + Call", draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-38 (work in + progress), April 2016. [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] Gellens, R. and H. Tschofenig, "Next-Generation Pan- - European eCall", draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-03 (work in - progress), July 2015. + European eCall", draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-07 (work in + progress), February 2016. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate - Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/ - RFC2119, March 1997, + Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, + DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC3023] Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML Media Types", RFC 3023, DOI 10.17487/RFC3023, January 2001, . [RFC4119] Peterson, J., "A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format", RFC 4119, DOI 10.17487/RFC4119, December 2005, . [RFC4288] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures", RFC 4288, DOI 10.17487/RFC4288, December 2005, . [RFC5031] Schulzrinne, H., "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for - Emergency and Other Well-Known Services", RFC 5031, DOI - 10.17487/RFC5031, January 2008, + Emergency and Other Well-Known Services", RFC 5031, + DOI 10.17487/RFC5031, January 2008, . + [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an + IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, + DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008, + . + [RFC5491] Winterbottom, J., Thomson, M., and H. Tschofenig, "GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations", RFC 5491, DOI 10.17487/RFC5491, March 2009, . [RFC5962] Schulzrinne, H., Singh, V., Tschofenig, H., and M. Thomson, "Dynamic Extensions to the Presence Information - Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5962, DOI - 10.17487/RFC5962, September 2010, + Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5962, + DOI 10.17487/RFC5962, September 2010, . [RFC6443] Rosen, B., Schulzrinne, H., Polk, J., and A. Newton, "Framework for Emergency Calling Using Internet Multimedia", RFC 6443, DOI 10.17487/RFC6443, December 2011, . [RFC6881] Rosen, B. and J. Polk, "Best Current Practice for Communications Services in Support of Emergency Calling", BCP 181, RFC 6881, DOI 10.17487/RFC6881, March 2013, . - [VEDS] "Vehicular Emergency Data Set (VEDS) version 3", July - 2012, . + [VEDS] Advanced Automatic Crash Notification (AACN) Joint APCO/ + NENA Data Standardization Workgroup, , "Vehicular + Emergency Data Set (VEDS) version 3", July 2012, + . 17.2. Informative references [RFC5012] Schulzrinne, H. and R. Marshall, Ed., "Requirements for Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies", RFC 5012, DOI 10.17487/RFC5012, January 2008, . [RFC5069] Taylor, T., Ed., Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H., and M. Shanmugam, "Security Threats and Requirements for - Emergency Call Marking and Mapping", RFC 5069, DOI - 10.17487/RFC5069, January 2008, + Emergency Call Marking and Mapping", RFC 5069, + DOI 10.17487/RFC5069, January 2008, . [RFC7378] Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H., and B. Aboba, Ed., "Trustworthy Location", RFC 7378, DOI 10.17487/RFC7378, December 2014, . + [triage-2008] + National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, and + Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, + "Recommendations from the Expert Panel: Advanced Automatic + Collision Notification and Triage of the Injured Patient", + 2008, . + + [triage-2011] + National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, and + Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Guidelines + for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of + the National Expert Panel on Field Triage", January 2012, + . + Authors' Addresses + Randall Gellens - Qualcomm Technologies, Inc - 5775 Morehouse Drive - San Diego 92651 + Consultant + 6755 Mira Mesa Blvd 123-151 + San Diego 92121 US Email: rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org Brian Rosen NeuStar, Inc. 470 Conrad Dr Mars, PA 16046 US @@ -1226,16 +2054,15 @@ Email: rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org Brian Rosen NeuStar, Inc. 470 Conrad Dr Mars, PA 16046 US Email: br@brianrosen.net - Hannes Tschofenig - (Individual) + Individual Email: Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net URI: http://www.tschofenig.priv.at