draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-19.txt | draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
ECRIT R. Gellens | ECRIT R. Gellens | |||
Internet-Draft Core Technology Consulting | Internet-Draft Core Technology Consulting | |||
Intended status: Standards Track B. Rosen | Intended status: Standards Track B. Rosen | |||
Expires: May 18, 2017 NeuStar, Inc. | Expires: June 18, 2017 NeuStar, Inc. | |||
H. Tschofenig | H. Tschofenig | |||
Individual | Individual | |||
November 14, 2016 | December 15, 2016 | |||
Next-Generation Vehicle-Initiated Emergency Calls | Next-Generation Vehicle-Initiated Emergency Calls | |||
draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-19.txt | draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-20.txt | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
This document describes how to use IP-based emergency services | This document describes how to use IP-based emergency services | |||
mechanisms to support the next generation of emergency calls placed | mechanisms to support the next generation of emergency calls placed | |||
by vehicles (automatically in the event of a crash or serious | by vehicles (automatically in the event of a crash or serious | |||
incident, or manually invoked by a vehicle occupant) and conveying | incident, or manually invoked by a vehicle occupant) and conveying | |||
vehicle, sensor, and location data related to the crash or incident. | vehicle, sensor, and location data related to the crash or incident. | |||
Such calls are often referred to as "Automatic Crash Notification" | Such calls are often referred to as "Automatic Crash Notification" | |||
(ACN), or "Advanced Automatic Crash Notification" (AACN), even in the | (ACN), or "Advanced Automatic Crash Notification" (AACN), even in the | |||
case of manual trigger. The "Advanced" qualifier refers to the | case of manual trigger. The "Advanced" qualifier refers to the | |||
ability to carry a richer set of data. | ability to carry a richer set of data. | |||
This document also registers a MIME media type and Emergency Call | This document also registers a MIME media type and Emergency Call | |||
Additional Data Block for the vehicle, sensor, and location data | Additional Data Block for the vehicle, sensor, and location data | |||
(often referred to as "crash data" even though there is not | (often referred to as "crash data" even though there is not | |||
necessarily a crash) and an INFO package to enable carrying this and | necessarily a crash) and a SIP INFO package to enable carrying this | |||
related data in INFO requests. An external specification for the | and related data in SIP INFO requests. An external specification for | |||
data format, contents, and structure are referenced in this document. | the data format, contents, and structure are referenced in this | |||
document. | ||||
This document reuses the technical aspects of next-generation pan- | This document reuses the technical aspects of next-generation pan- | |||
European eCall (a mandated and standardized system for emergency | European eCall (a mandated and standardized system for emergency | |||
calls by in-vehicle systems within Europe and other regions). | calls by in-vehicle systems within Europe and other regions). | |||
However, this document specifies a different set of vehicle (crash) | However, this document specifies a different set of vehicle (crash) | |||
data, specifically, the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) rather than | data, specifically, the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) rather than | |||
the eCall Minimum Set of Data (MSD). This document is an extension | the eCall Minimum Set of Data (MSD). This document is an extension | |||
of the eCall document, with the primary differences being that this | of the eCall document, with the primary differences being that this | |||
document makes the MSD data set optional and VEDS mandatory, and adds | document makes the MSD data set optional and VEDS mandatory, and adds | |||
attribute values to the metadata/control object to permit greater | attribute values to the metadata/control object to permit greater | |||
functionality. This document registers a new INFO package (identical | functionality. This document registers a new SIP INFO package | |||
to that registered for eCall but with the addition of the VEDS MIME | (identical to that registered for eCall but with the addition of the | |||
type). This document also describes legacy (circuit-switched) ACN | VEDS MIME type). This document also describes legacy (circuit- | |||
systems and their migration to next-generation emergency calling, to | switched) ACN systems and their migration to next-generation | |||
provide background information and context. | emergency calling, to provide background information and context. | |||
Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | |||
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | |||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 18, 2017. | This Internet-Draft will expire on June 18, 2017. | |||
Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | |||
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | |||
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | |||
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | |||
described in the Simplified BSD License. | described in the Simplified BSD License. | |||
Table of Contents | Table of Contents | |||
1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | 2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 | |||
3. Document Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 3. Document Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
4. Overview of Legacy Deployment Models . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | 4. Overview of Legacy Deployment Models . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 | |||
5. Migration to Next-Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 5. Migration to Next-Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
6. Vehicle Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | 6. Vehicle Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 | |||
7. Data Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 | 7. Data Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 | |||
8. Call Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | 8. Call Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 | |||
9. Call Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | 9. New Metadata/Control Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 | |||
10. New Metadata/Control Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 | 9.1. New values for the 'action' attribute' . . . . . . . . . 17 | |||
10.1. New values for the 'action' attribute' . . . . . . . . . 19 | 9.2. Request Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 | |||
10.2. Request Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | 9.3. The <ack> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
10.3. The <ack> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | 9.4. The <capabilities> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | |||
10.4. The <capabilities> element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | 10. Test Calls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | |||
11. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | ||||
11. Test Calls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | 12. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 | |||
12. The emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS INFO package . . . . . . . . 22 | 13. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 | |||
12.1. Overall Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | 14. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 | |||
12.2. Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | 14.1. MIME Media Type Registration for | |||
12.3. Info Package Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | 'application/EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' . . . . . . . . . . 28 | |||
12.4. Info Package Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | 14.2. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call | |||
12.5. SIP Option-Tags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | Data Types registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 | |||
12.6. INFO Request Body Parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | 14.3. New Action Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 | |||
12.7. Info Package Usage Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 | 14.4. Emergency Call Static Message Registry . . . . . . . . . 30 | |||
12.8. Rate of INFO Requests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 | 14.5. Emergency Call Vehicle Lamp ID Registry . . . . . . . . 31 | |||
12.9. Info Package Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . 25 | 14.6. Lamp State Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 | |||
12.10. Implementation Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 | 14.7. Emergency Call Vehicle Camera ID Registry . . . . . . . 33 | |||
12.11. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 | 14.8. The emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS SIP INFO package . . . 34 | |||
13. Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 | 15. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 | |||
14. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 | 16. Changes from Previous Versions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 | |||
15. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 | 16.1. Changes from draft-ietf-18 to draft-ietf-19 . . . . . . 37 | |||
16. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 | 16.2. Changes from draft-ietf-17 to draft-ietf-18 . . . . . . 38 | |||
16.1. MIME Media Type Registration for | 16.3. Changes from draft-ietf-16 to draft-ietf-17 . . . . . . 38 | |||
'application/EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' . . . . . . . . . . 32 | 16.4. Changes from draft-ietf-14 to draft-ietf-15 . . . . . . 38 | |||
16.2. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call | 16.5. Changes from draft-ietf-13 to draft-ietf-14 . . . . . . 38 | |||
Additional Data registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 | 16.6. Changes from draft-ietf-11 to draft-ietf-13 . . . . . . 38 | |||
16.3. New Action Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 | 16.7. Changes from draft-ietf-10 to draft-ietf-11 . . . . . . 38 | |||
16.4. Emergency Call Static Message Registry . . . . . . . . . 34 | 16.8. Changes from draft-ietf-09 to draft-ietf-10 . . . . . . 38 | |||
16.5. Emergency Call Vehicle Lamp ID Registry . . . . . . . . 35 | 16.9. Changes from draft-ietf-08 to draft-ietf-09 . . . . . . 39 | |||
16.6. Emergency Call Vehicle Camera ID Registry . . . . . . . 36 | 16.10. Changes from draft-ietf-07 to draft-ietf-08 . . . . . . 39 | |||
17. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 | 16.11. Changes from draft-ietf-06 to draft-ietf-07 . . . . . . 39 | |||
18. Changes from Previous Versions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 | 16.12. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 . . . . . . 39 | |||
18.1. Changes from draft-ietf-18 to draft-ietf-19 . . . . . . 37 | 16.13. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 . . . . . . 39 | |||
18.2. Changes from draft-ietf-17 to draft-ietf-18 . . . . . . 38 | 16.14. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 . . . . . . 39 | |||
18.3. Changes from draft-ietf-16 to draft-ietf-17 . . . . . . 38 | 16.15. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 . . . . . . 39 | |||
18.4. Changes from draft-ietf-14 to draft-ietf-15 . . . . . . 38 | 16.16. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 . . . . . . 40 | |||
18.5. Changes from draft-ietf-13 to draft-ietf-14 . . . . . . 38 | 16.17. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 . . . . . . 40 | |||
18.6. Changes from draft-ietf-11 to draft-ietf-13 . . . . . . 38 | 16.18. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to draft-ietf-00 . . . . . 40 | |||
18.7. Changes from draft-ietf-10 to draft-ietf-11 . . . . . . 38 | 16.19. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 . . . . . . . . . . 40 | |||
18.8. Changes from draft-ietf-09 to draft-ietf-10 . . . . . . 38 | 16.20. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 . . . . . . . . . . 40 | |||
18.9. Changes from draft-ietf-08 to draft-ietf-09 . . . . . . 39 | 17. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 | |||
18.10. Changes from draft-ietf-07 to draft-ietf-08 . . . . . . 39 | 17.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 | |||
18.11. Changes from draft-ietf-06 to draft-ietf-07 . . . . . . 39 | 17.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 | |||
18.12. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 . . . . . . 39 | ||||
18.13. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 . . . . . . 39 | ||||
18.14. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 . . . . . . 39 | ||||
18.15. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 . . . . . . 39 | ||||
18.16. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 . . . . . . 40 | ||||
18.17. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 . . . . . . 40 | ||||
18.18. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to draft-ietf-00 . . . . . 40 | ||||
18.19. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 . . . . . . . . . . 40 | ||||
18.20. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 . . . . . . . . . . 40 | ||||
19. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 | ||||
19.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 | ||||
19.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 | ||||
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 | |||
1. Terminology | 1. Terminology | |||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | |||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this | "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this | |||
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. | document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. | |||
This document re-uses terminology defined in Section 3 of [RFC5012]. | This document re-uses terminology defined in Section 3 of [RFC5012]. | |||
skipping to change at page 4, line 34 ¶ | skipping to change at page 4, line 23 ¶ | |||
| APCO | Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials | | | APCO | Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials | | |||
| EENA | European Emergency Number Association | | | EENA | European Emergency Number Association | | |||
| ESInet | Emergency Services IP network | | | ESInet | Emergency Services IP network | | |||
| GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System (which includes | | | GNSS | Global Navigation Satellite System (which includes | | |||
| | various systems such as the Global Positioning System or | | | | various systems such as the Global Positioning System or | | |||
| | GPS) | | | | GPS) | | |||
| IVS | In-Vehicle System | | | IVS | In-Vehicle System | | |||
| MNO | Mobile Network Operator | | | MNO | Mobile Network Operator | | |||
| MSD | eCall Minimum Set of Data | | | MSD | eCall Minimum Set of Data | | |||
| NENA | National Emergency Number Association | | | NENA | National Emergency Number Association | | |||
| NG | Next-Generation | | ||||
| POTS | Plain Old Telephone Service (normal, circuit-switched | | | POTS | Plain Old Telephone Service (normal, circuit-switched | | |||
| | voice calls) | | | | voice calls) | | |||
| PSAP | Public Safety Answering Point | | | PSAP | Public Safety Answering Point | | |||
| TSP | Telematics Service Provider | | | TSP | Telematics Service Provider | | |||
| VEDS | Vehicle Emergency Data Set | | | VEDS | Vehicle Emergency Data Set | | |||
+--------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | +--------+----------------------------------------------------------+ | |||
Because the endpoints of an NG-ACN call are a PSAP and an IVS or TSP, | Because the endpoints of a Next-Generation ACN call are a PSAP and an | |||
to avoid receptively writing "IVS or TSP", the term "IVS" is used to | IVS or TSP, to avoid receptively writing "IVS or TSP", the term "IVS" | |||
represent either an IVS or TSP when discussing signaling behavior | is used to represent either an IVS or TSP when discussing signaling | |||
(e.g., attaching VEDS data, sending an INVITE request, receiving an | behavior (e.g., sending VEDS data, sending a SIP INVITE request, | |||
INFO request, etc.). | receiving a SIP INFO request, etc.). | |||
2. Introduction | 2. Introduction | |||
Emergency calls made by in-vehicle systems (e.g., automatically in | Emergency calls made by in-vehicle systems (e.g., automatically in | |||
the event of a crash or serious incident or manually by a vehicle | the event of a crash or serious incident or manually by a vehicle | |||
occupant) assist in significantly reducing road deaths and injuries | occupant) assist in significantly reducing road deaths and injuries | |||
by allowing emergency services to respond quickly and appropriately | by allowing emergency services to respond quickly and appropriately | |||
to the specifics of the incident, often with better location | to the specifics of the incident, often with better location | |||
accuracy. | accuracy. | |||
skipping to change at page 6, line 8 ¶ | skipping to change at page 5, line 43 ¶ | |||
on either a human advisor or an automated text-to-speech system to | on either a human advisor or an automated text-to-speech system to | |||
provide the PSAP call taker with some crash data orally, or in some | provide the PSAP call taker with some crash data orally, or in some | |||
cases via a proprietary mechanism). In most cases, the PSAP call | cases via a proprietary mechanism). In most cases, the PSAP call | |||
taker needs to first realize that the call is related to a vehicle | taker needs to first realize that the call is related to a vehicle | |||
incident, and then listen to the data and transcribe it. Circuit- | incident, and then listen to the data and transcribe it. Circuit- | |||
switched ACN systems are referred to here as CS-ACN. | switched ACN systems are referred to here as CS-ACN. | |||
The transition to next-generation calling in general, and for | The transition to next-generation calling in general, and for | |||
emergency calling in particular, provides an opportunity to vastly | emergency calling in particular, provides an opportunity to vastly | |||
improve the scope, breadth, reliability and usefulness of crash data | improve the scope, breadth, reliability and usefulness of crash data | |||
during an emergency by allowing it to be transmitted during call set- | during an emergency by allowing a standardized set to be transmitted | |||
up, and to be automatically processed by the PSAP and made available | during call set-up; to be automatically processed by the PSAP and | |||
to the call taker in an integrated, automated way, as well as provide | made available to the call taker in an integrated, automated way; as | |||
the ability for a PSAP call taker to request that a vehicle take | well as provide the ability for a PSAP call taker to request that a | |||
certain actions, such as flashing lights or unlocking doors. In | vehicle take certain actions, such as flashing lights or unlocking | |||
addition, vehicle manufacturers are provided an opportunity to take | doors. In addition, vehicle manufacturers are provided an | |||
advantage of the same standardized mechanisms for data transmission | opportunity to take advantage of the same standardized mechanisms for | |||
and request processing for internal use if they wish (such as | data transmission and request processing for internal use if they | |||
telemetry between the vehicle and a service center for both emergency | wish (such as telemetry between the vehicle and a service center for | |||
and non-emergency uses, including location-based services, multi- | both emergency and non-emergency uses, including location-based | |||
media entertainment systems, remote door unlocking, and road-side | services, multi-media entertainment systems, remote door unlocking, | |||
assistance applications). | remote diagnostics, and road-side assistance applications). | |||
Next-generation ACN provides an opportunity for such calls to be | Next-generation ACN provides an opportunity for such calls to be | |||
recognized and processed as such during call set-up, and routed to an | recognized and processed as such during call set-up, and routed to an | |||
equipped PSAP where the vehicle data is available to assist the call | equipped PSAP where the vehicle data is available to assist the call | |||
taker in assessing and responding to the situation. Next-generation | taker in assessing and responding to the situation. Next-generation | |||
(IP-based) ACN systems are referred to here as NG-ACN. | (IP-based) ACN systems are referred to here as NG-ACN. | |||
An ACN call can be initiated by a vehicle occupant or automatically | An ACN call can be initiated by a vehicle occupant or automatically | |||
initiated by vehicle systems in the event of a serious incident. | initiated by vehicle systems in the event of a serious incident. | |||
(The "A" in "ACN" does stand for "Automatic," but the term is broadly | (The "A" in "ACN" does stand for "Automatic," but the term is broadly | |||
used to refer to the class of calls that are placed by an in-vehicle | used to refer to the class of calls that are placed by an in-vehicle | |||
system (IVS) or Telematics Service Providers (TSP) and that carry | system (IVS) or Telematics Service Providers (TSP) and that carry | |||
incident-related data as well as voice.) Automatically triggered | incident-related data as well as voice.) Automatically triggered | |||
calls indicate a car crash or some other serious incident (e.g., a | calls indicate a car crash or some other serious incident (e.g., a | |||
fire). Manually triggered calls are often reports of observed | fire). Manually triggered calls include reports of observed crashes | |||
crashes or serious hazards (such as impaired drivers or roadway | or serious hazards (such as impaired drivers or roadway debris). | |||
debris). In some implementations, manually triggered calls might be | ||||
more likely to be accidental. | ||||
The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and | The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and | |||
the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) have jointly | the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) have jointly | |||
developed a standardized set of incident-related vehicle data for ACN | developed a standardized set of incident-related vehicle data for ACN | |||
use, called the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) [VEDS]. Such data | use, called the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) [VEDS]. Such data | |||
is often referred to as crash data although it is applicable in | is often referred to as crash data although it is applicable in | |||
incidents other than crashes. | incidents other than crashes. | |||
This document describes how the IETF mechanisms for IP-based | This document describes how the IETF mechanisms for IP-based | |||
emergency calls are used to provide the realization of next- | emergency calls are used to provide the realization of next- | |||
generation ACN. | generation ACN. Although this specification is designed with the | |||
requirements for North America ACN in mind (and both APCO and NENA | ||||
are based in the U.S.), it is specified generically such that the | ||||
technology can be re-used or extended to suit requirements in other | ||||
regions. | ||||
This document reuses the technical aspects of next-generation pan- | This document reuses the technical aspects of next-generation pan- | |||
European eCall (a mandated and standardized system for emergency | European eCall (a mandated and standardized system for emergency | |||
calls by in-vehicle systems within Europe), as described in | calls by in-vehicle systems within Europe), as described in | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. However, this document specifies a different | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. However, this document specifies a different | |||
set of vehicle (crash) data, specifically, the Vehicle Emergency Data | set of vehicle (crash) data, specifically, the Vehicle Emergency Data | |||
Set (VEDS) rather than the eCall Minimum Set of Data (MSD). This | Set (VEDS) rather than the eCall Minimum Set of Data (MSD). This | |||
document is an extension of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], with the | document is an extension of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], with the | |||
differences being that this document makes the MSD data set optional | differences being that this document makes the MSD data set optional | |||
and VEDS mandatory, and adds new attribute values to the metadata/ | and VEDS mandatory, and adds new attribute values to the metadata/ | |||
control object defined in that document. This document also | control object defined in that document. This document also | |||
registers a new INFO package (identical to that defined in | registers a new SIP INFO package (identical to that defined in | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] with the addition of the VEDS MIME type). | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] with the addition of the VEDS MIME type). | |||
This document registers the 'application/EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml' | This document registers the 'application/EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml' | |||
MIME media type, registers the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call | MIME media type, registers the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call | |||
Additional Data registry, and registers an INFO package to enable | Data Types registry, and registers a SIP INFO package to enable | |||
carrying this and related data in INFO requests. | carrying this and related data in SIP INFO requests. | |||
Section 6 introduces VEDS. Section 7 describes how VEDS data and | Section 6 introduces VEDS. Section 7 describes how VEDS data and | |||
metadata/control blocks are transported within NG-ACN calls. | metadata/control blocks are transported within NG-ACN calls. | |||
Section 8 describes how such calls are placed. | Section 8 describes how such calls are placed. | |||
These mechanisms are used to place emergency calls that are | These mechanisms are used to place emergency calls that are | |||
identifiable as ACN calls and that carry standardized crash data in | identifiable as ACN calls and that carry standardized crash data in | |||
an interoperable way. | an interoperable way. | |||
Calls by in-vehicle systems are placed using cellular networks, which | Calls by in-vehicle systems are placed using cellular networks, which | |||
might ignore location information sent by an originating device in an | might ignore location information sent by an originating device in an | |||
emergency call INVITE, instead attaching their own location | emergency call INVITE, instead substituting their own location | |||
information (often determined in cooperation with the originating | information (often determined in cooperation with the originating | |||
device). Standardized crash data structures often include location | device). Standardized crash data structures often include location | |||
as determined by the IVS. A benefit of this is that it allows the | as determined by the IVS. A benefit of this is that it allows the | |||
PSAP to see both the location as determined by the cellular network | PSAP to see both the location as determined by the cellular network | |||
(often in cooperation with the originating device) and the location | (often in cooperation with the originating device) and the location | |||
as determined by the IVS. | as determined by the IVS. | |||
This specification inherits the ability to utilize test call | This specification inherits the ability to utilize test call | |||
functionality from Section 15 of [RFC6881]. | functionality from Section 15 of [RFC6881]. | |||
3. Document Scope | 3. Document Scope | |||
This document is focused on how an ACN emergency call is setup and | This document is focused on how an ACN emergency call is setup and | |||
incident-related data (including vehicle, sensor, and location data) | incident-related data (including vehicle, sensor, and location data) | |||
is transmitted to the PSAP using IETF specifications. For the direct | is transmitted to the PSAP using IETF specifications. For the direct | |||
model, this is the end-to-end description (between the vehicle and | model, this is the end-to-end description (between the vehicle and | |||
the PSAP). For the TSP model, this describes the call leg between | the PSAP). For the TSP model, this describes the call leg between | |||
the TSP and the PSAP, leaving the call leg between the vehicle and | the TSP and the PSAP, leaving the call leg between the vehicle and | |||
the TSP up to the entities involved (i.e., IVS and TSP vendors) who | the TSP up to the entities involved (i.e., IVS and TSP vendors) who | |||
are then free to use the same mechanism as for the right-hand side or | are then free to use the same mechanism as for the other leg or not. | |||
not. | ||||
Note that Europe has a mandated and standardized system for emergency | Note that Europe has a mandated and standardized system for emergency | |||
calls by in-vehicle systems. This pan-European system is known as | calls by in-vehicle systems. This pan-European system is known as | |||
"eCall" and is the subject of a separate document, | "eCall" and is the subject of a separate document, | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which this document builds on. Vehicles | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which this document builds on. Vehicles | |||
designed to operate in multiple regions might need to support eCall | designed to operate in multiple regions might need to support eCall | |||
as well as NG-ACN as described here. A vehicle IVS might determine | as well as NG-ACN as described here. A vehicle IVS might determine | |||
whether to use eCall or ACN by first determining the region or | whether to use eCall or ACN by first determining the region or | |||
country in which it is located (e.g., from a GNSS location estimate | country in which it is located (e.g., from a GNSS location estimate | |||
and/or identity of or information from an MNO). If other regions | and/or identity of or information from an MNO). If other regions | |||
skipping to change at page 8, line 25 ¶ | skipping to change at page 8, line 13 ¶ | |||
support those as well. This document adopts the call set-up and | support those as well. This document adopts the call set-up and | |||
other technical aspects of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which uses | other technical aspects of [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which uses | |||
[RFC7852]; this makes it straightforward to use a different data set | [RFC7852]; this makes it straightforward to use a different data set | |||
while keeping other technical aspects unchanged. Hence, both NG- | while keeping other technical aspects unchanged. Hence, both NG- | |||
eCall and the NG-ACN mechanism described here are compatible, | eCall and the NG-ACN mechanism described here are compatible, | |||
differing primarily in the specific data block that is sent (the | differing primarily in the specific data block that is sent (the | |||
eCall MSD in the case of NG-eCall, and the APCO/NENA VEDS used in | eCall MSD in the case of NG-eCall, and the APCO/NENA VEDS used in | |||
this document), and some additions to the metadata/control data | this document), and some additions to the metadata/control data | |||
block. If other regions adopt their own vehicle data sets, this can | block. If other regions adopt their own vehicle data sets, this can | |||
be similarly accomodated without changing other technical aspects. | be similarly accomodated without changing other technical aspects. | |||
Note that any additional data formats require a new INFO package to | Note that any additional data formats require a new SIP INFO package | |||
permit transport within INFO requests. | to permit transport within SIP INFO requests. | |||
4. Overview of Legacy Deployment Models | 4. Overview of Legacy Deployment Models | |||
Legacy (circuit-switched) systems for placing emergency calls by in- | Legacy (circuit-switched) systems for placing emergency calls by in- | |||
vehicle systems generally have some ability to convey at least | vehicle systems generally have some ability to convey at least | |||
location and in some cases telematics data to the PSAP. Most such | location and in some cases telematics data to the PSAP. Most such | |||
systems use one of three architectural models, which are described | systems use one of three architectural models, which are described | |||
here as: "Telematics Service Provider" (TSP), "direct", and "paired". | here as: "Telematics Service Provider" (TSP), "direct", and "paired". | |||
These three models are illustrated below. | These three models are illustrated below. | |||
skipping to change at page 10, line 9 ¶ | skipping to change at page 9, line 40 ¶ | |||
///----\\\ 911/etc voice call via IVS +------+ | ///----\\\ 911/etc voice call via IVS +------+ | |||
||| IVS |||---------------------------------------->+ PSAP | | ||| IVS |||---------------------------------------->+ PSAP | | |||
\\\----/// location via text-to-speech +------+ | \\\----/// location via text-to-speech +------+ | |||
Figure 3: Legacy Direct Model | Figure 3: Legacy Direct Model | |||
5. Migration to Next-Generation | 5. Migration to Next-Generation | |||
Migration of emergency calls placed by in-vehicle systems to next- | Migration of emergency calls placed by in-vehicle systems to next- | |||
generation (all-IP) technology per this document provides a | generation (all-IP) technology per this document provides a | |||
standardized mechanism to identify such calls and to present crash | standardized mechanism to identify such calls and to convey crash | |||
data with the call, as well as enabling additional communications | data with the call setup, as well as enabling additional | |||
modalities and enhanced functionality. This allows ACN calls and | communications modalities and enhanced functionality. This allows | |||
crash data to be automatically processed by the PSAP and made | ACN calls and crash data to be automatically processed by the PSAP | |||
available to the call taker in an integrated, automated way. Because | and made available to the call taker in an integrated, automated way. | |||
the crash data is carried in the initial SIP INVITE (per [RFC7852]) | Because the crash data is carried in the initial SIP INVITE (per | |||
the PSAP can present it to the call taker simultaneously with the | [RFC7852]) the PSAP can present it to the call taker simultaneously | |||
appearance of the call. The PSAP can also process the data to take | with the appearance of the call. The PSAP can also process the data | |||
other actions (e.g., if multiple calls from the same location arrive | to take other actions (e.g., if multiple calls from the same location | |||
when the PSAP is busy and a subset of them are NG-ACN calls, a PSAP | arrive when the PSAP is busy and a subset of them are NG-ACN calls, a | |||
might choose to store the information and reject the calls, since the | PSAP might choose to store the information and reject the calls, | |||
IVS will receive confirmation that the information has been | since the IVS will receive confirmation that the information has been | |||
successfully received; a PSAP could also choose to include a message | successfully received; a PSAP could also choose to include a message | |||
stating that it is aware of the incident and responders are on the | stating that it is aware of the incident and responders are on the | |||
way; a PSAP could call the vehicle back when a call taker is | way; a PSAP could call the vehicle back when a call taker is | |||
available). | available). | |||
Origination devices and networks, PSAPs, emergency services networks, | The migration of origination devices and networks, PSAPs, emergency | |||
and other telephony environments are migrating to next-generation. | services networks, and other telephony environments to next- | |||
This provides opportunities for significant enhancement to | generation provides enhanced interoperability and functionality, | |||
interoperability and functionality, especially for emergency calls | especially for emergency calls carrying additional data such as | |||
carrying additional data such as vehicle crash data. (In the U.S., a | vehicle crash data. (In the U.S., a network specifically for | |||
network specifically for emergency responders is being developed. | emergency responders is being developed. This network, FirstNet, | |||
This network, FirstNet, will be next-generation from the start, | will be next-generation from the start, enhancing the ability for | |||
enhancing the ability for data exchange between PSAPs and | data exchange between PSAPs and responders.) | |||
responders.) | ||||
Migration to next-generation (NG) provides an opportunity to | NG-ACN calls can be recognized as originating from a vehicle, routed | |||
significantly improve the handling and response to vehicle-initiated | to a PSAP prepared both technically and operationally to handle such | |||
emergency calls. Such calls can be recognized as originating from a | calls, and the vehicle-determined location and crash data made | |||
vehicle, routed to a PSAP equipped both technically and operationally | available to the call taker simultaneously with the call appearance. | |||
to handle such calls, and the vehicle-determined location and crash | The PSAP can take advantage of enhanced functionality, including the | |||
data can be made available to the call taker simultaneously with the | ability to request the vehicle to take an action, such as sending an | |||
call appearance. The PSAP can take advantage of enhanced | updated set of data, converying a message to the occupants, flashing | |||
functionality, including the ability to request the vehicle to take | lights, unlocking doors, etc. | |||
an action, such as sending an updated set of data, converying a | ||||
message to the occupants, flashing lights, unlocking doors, etc. | ||||
Vehicle manufacturers using the TSP model can choose to take | Vehicle manufacturers using the TSP model can choose to take | |||
advantage of the same mechanism to carry telematics data and requests | advantage of the same mechanism to carry telematics data and requests | |||
and responses between the vehicle and the TSP for both emergency and | and responses between the vehicle and the TSP for both emergency and | |||
non-emergency calls as are used for the interface with the PSAP. | non-emergency calls as are used for the interface with the PSAP. | |||
A next-generation IVS establishes an emergency call using the | A next-generation IVS establishes a next-generation emergency call | |||
emergency call solution as described in [RFC6443] and [RFC6881], with | (see [RFC6443] and [RFC6881]), with an initial INVITE containing a | |||
the difference that the Request-URI indicates an ACN type of | Request-URI indicating an ACN type of emergency call and Call-Info | |||
emergency call, the IVS typically does not perform routing or | header fields indicating that both vehicle crash and capabilities | |||
location queries but relies on the carrier for this, and uses Call- | data are included; the IVS typically does not perform routing or | |||
Info header fields to indicates that vehicle crash and capabilities | location queries but relies on the carrier for this. | |||
data is attached. When an ESInet is deployed, the MNO only needs to | ||||
recognize the call as an emergency call and route it to an ESInet. | ||||
The ESInet can recognize the call as an ACN with vehicle data and can | ||||
route the call to an NG-ACN capable PSAP. Such a PSAP can interpret | ||||
the vehicle data sent with the call and make it available to the call | ||||
taker. | ||||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] registers new service URN children within the | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] registers new service URN children within the | |||
"sos" subservice. These URNs request NG-ACN resources, and | "sos" subservice. These URNs request NG-ACN resources, and | |||
differentiate between manually and automatically triggered NG-ACN | differentiate between manually and automatically triggered NG-ACN | |||
calls (which might be subject to different treatment depending on | calls (which might be subject to different treatment depending on | |||
policy). The two service URNs registered in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] | policy). The two service URNs registered in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] | |||
are "urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic" and | are "urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic" and | |||
"urn:service:sos.ecall.manual". The same service URNs are used for | "urn:service:sos.ecall.manual". The same service URNs are used for | |||
ACN as for eCall since in any region only one of these is supported, | ACN as for eCall since in any region only one of these is supported, | |||
making a distinction unnecessary. (Further, PSAP equipment might | making a distinction unnecessary. (Further, PSAP equipment might | |||
skipping to change at page 11, line 43 ¶ | skipping to change at page 11, line 17 ¶ | |||
header field retains the full sub-service; route and handling | header field retains the full sub-service; route and handling | |||
decisions within an ESInet or PSAP can take the sub-service into | decisions within an ESInet or PSAP can take the sub-service into | |||
account. For example, in a region with multiple cooperating PSAPs, | account. For example, in a region with multiple cooperating PSAPs, | |||
an NG-ACN call might be routed to a PSAP that is NG-ACN capable, or | an NG-ACN call might be routed to a PSAP that is NG-ACN capable, or | |||
one that specializes in vehicle-related incidents. | one that specializes in vehicle-related incidents. | |||
Migration of the three architectural models to next-generation (all- | Migration of the three architectural models to next-generation (all- | |||
IP) is described below. | IP) is described below. | |||
In the TSP model, the IVS transmits crash and location data to the | In the TSP model, the IVS transmits crash and location data to the | |||
TSP either by re-using the mechanisms and data objects described | TSP either by re-using the mechanisms and data objects described in | |||
here, or using a proprietary mechanism. In an emergency, the TSP | this document, or using a proprietary mechanism. In an emergency, | |||
bridges in the PSAP and the TSP transmits crash and other data to the | the TSP bridges in the PSAP and the TSP transmits crash and other | |||
PSAP using the mechanisms and data objects described here. There is | data to the PSAP using the mechanisms and data objects described in | |||
a three-way call between the vehicle, the TSP, and the PSAP, allowing | this document. There is a three-way call between the vehicle, the | |||
communication between the PSAP call taker, the TSP call taker, and | TSP, and the PSAP, allowing communication between the PSAP call | |||
the vehicle occupants (who might be unconscious). The TSP relays | taker, the TSP call taker, and the vehicle occupants (who might be | |||
PSAP requests and vehicle responses. | unconscious). The TSP relays PSAP requests and vehicle responses. | |||
proprietary | proprietary | |||
///----\\\ or standard +------+ standard +------+ | ///----\\\ or standard +------+ standard +------+ | |||
||| IVS ||| ------------------->+ TSP +------------------->+ PSAP | | ||| IVS ||| ------------------->+ TSP +------------------->+ PSAP | | |||
\\\----/// crash + other data +------+ crash + other data +------+ | \\\----/// crash + other data +------+ crash + other data +------+ | |||
Figure 4: Next-Generation TSP Model | Figure 4: Next-Generation TSP Model | |||
The vehicle manufacturer and the TSP can choose to use the same | The vehicle manufacturer and the TSP can choose to use the same | |||
mechanisms and data objects on the left call leg in Figure 4 as on | mechanisms and data objects on the left call leg in Figure 4 as on | |||
the right. (Note that the TSP model can be more difficult when the | the right. (Note that the TSP model can be more difficult when the | |||
vehicle is in a different country than the TSP (e.g., a US resident | vehicle is in a different country than the TSP (e.g., a US resident | |||
driving in Canada or Mexico) because of the additional complexity in | driving in Canada) because of the additional complexity in choosing | |||
choosing the correct PSAP based on vehicle location performed by a | the correct PSAP based on vehicle location performed by a TSP in a | |||
TSP in a different country.) | different country.) | |||
In the direct model, the IVS communicates crash data to the PSAP | In the direct model, the IVS communicates crash data to the PSAP | |||
directly using the mechanisms and data objects described here. | directly using the mechanisms and data objects described in this | |||
document. | ||||
///----\\\ NG emergency call +------+ | ///----\\\ NG emergency call +------+ | |||
||| IVS |||----------------------------------------->+ PSAP | | ||| IVS |||----------------------------------------->+ PSAP | | |||
\\\----/// crash + other data +------+ | \\\----/// crash + other data +------+ | |||
Figure 5: Next-Generation Direct Model | Figure 5: Next-Generation Direct Model | |||
In the paired model, the IVS uses a Bluetooth link to a previously- | In the paired model, the IVS uses a Bluetooth link to a previously- | |||
paired handset to establish an emergency call with the PSAP; it is | paired handset to establish an emergency call with the PSAP; it is | |||
undefined what facilities are or will be available for transmitting | unclear what facilities are or will be available for transmitting | |||
crash data through the Bluetooth link to the handset for inclusion in | crash data through the Bluetooth link to the handset for inclusion in | |||
an NG emergency call. Hence, manufacturers that use the paired model | an NG emergency call. Hence, manufacturers that use the paired model | |||
for legacy calls might choose to adopt either the direct or TSP | for legacy calls might choose to adopt either the direct or TSP | |||
models for next-generation calls. | models for next-generation calls. | |||
+---+ | +---+ | |||
///----\\\ (undefined) | H | standard +------+ | ///----\\\ (undefined) | H | standard +------+ | |||
||| IVS |||------------------>| S +------------------->+ PSAP | | ||| IVS |||------------------>| S +------------------->+ PSAP | | |||
\\\----/// (undefined) +---+ crash + other data +------+ | \\\----/// (undefined) +---+ crash + other data +------+ | |||
Figure 6: Next-Generation Paired Model | Figure 6: Next-Generation Paired Model | |||
If the call is routed to a PSAP that is not capable of processing the | If the call is routed to a PSAP that is not capable of processing the | |||
vehicle data, the PSAP ignores (or does not receive) the vehicle | vehicle data, the PSAP ignores (or does not receive) the vehicle | |||
data. This is detectable by the IVS or TSP when the status response | data. This is detectable by the IVS or TSP when the status response | |||
to the INVITE (e.., 200 OK) lacks a control structure acknowledging | to the INVITE (e.g., 200 OK) lacks a metadata/control structure | |||
receipt of the data [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. The IVS or TSP then | acknowledging receipt of the data [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. The IVS or | |||
proceeds as it would for a CS-ACN call (e.g., verbal conveyance of | TSP then proceeds as it would for a CS-ACN call (e.g., verbal | |||
data) | conveyance of data) | |||
6. Vehicle Data | 6. Vehicle Data | |||
The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and | The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and | |||
the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) have jointly | the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) have jointly | |||
developed a standardized set of incident-related vehicle data for ACN | developed a standardized set of incident-related vehicle data for ACN | |||
use, called the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) [VEDS]. Such data | use, called the Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) [VEDS]. Such data | |||
is often referred to as crash data although it is applicable in | is often referred to as crash data although it is applicable in | |||
incidents other than crashes. | incidents other than crashes. | |||
skipping to change at page 13, line 47 ¶ | skipping to change at page 13, line 21 ¶ | |||
o A set of data is standardized by an SDO or appropriate | o A set of data is standardized by an SDO or appropriate | |||
organization | organization | |||
o A MIME media type for the crash data set is registered with IANA | o A MIME media type for the crash data set is registered with IANA | |||
* If the data is specifically for use in emergency calling, the | * If the data is specifically for use in emergency calling, the | |||
MIME media type is normally under the 'application' type with a | MIME media type is normally under the 'application' type with a | |||
subtype starting with 'EmergencyCallData.' | subtype starting with 'EmergencyCallData.' | |||
* If the data format is XML, then by convention the name has a | * If the data format is XML, then by convention the name has a | |||
suffix of '+xml' | suffix of '+xml' | |||
o The item is registered in the Emergency Call Additional Data | o The item is registered in the Emergency Call Data Types registry, | |||
registry, as defined in Section 9.1.7 of [RFC7852] | as defined in Section 11.1.9 of [RFC7852] | |||
* For emergency-call-specific formats, the registered name is the | * For emergency-call-specific formats, the registered name is the | |||
root of the MIME media type (not including the | root of the MIME media type (not including the | |||
'EmergencyCallData' prefix and any suffix such as '+xml') as | 'EmergencyCallData' prefix and any suffix such as '+xml') as | |||
described in Section 4.1 of [RFC7852]. | described in Section 4.1 of [RFC7852]. | |||
o A new INFO package is registered that permits carrying the the new | o A new SIP INFO package is registered that permits carrying the the | |||
media type, the metadata/control object (defined in | new media type, the metadata/control object (defined in | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]), and for compatibility, the MSD and VEDS | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]), and for compatibility, the MSD and VEDS | |||
objects, in INFO messages. | objects, in SIP INFO requests. | |||
7. Data Transport | 7. Data Transport | |||
[RFC7852] establishes a general mechanism for attaching blocks of | [RFC7852] establishes a general mechanism for including blocks of | |||
data to a SIP emergency call. This mechanism permits certain | data within a SIP emergency call. This document makes use of that | |||
emergency call MIME types to be attached to SIP messages. This | mechanism. This document also registers a SIP INFO package (in | |||
document makes use of that mechanism. This document also registers | Section 14.8) to enable NG-ACN related data blocks to be carried in | |||
an INFO package (in Section 12) to enable NG-ACN related data blocks | SIP INFO requests (per [RFC6086], new SIP INFO method usages require | |||
to be carried in SIP INFO requests (per [RFC6086], new INFO usages | the definition of a SIP INFO package). | |||
require the definition of an INFO package). | ||||
The Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) is an XML structure defined by | ||||
the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and | ||||
the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) [VEDS]. It is | ||||
carried in a body part with MIME media type 'application/ | ||||
EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml'. | ||||
An In-Vehicle System (IVS) transmits a VEDS data block (see [VEDS]) | An In-Vehicle System (IVS) transmits a VEDS data block (see [VEDS]) | |||
by attaching it to a SIP message as a MIME body part per [RFC7852]. | by including it as a body part of a SIP message per [RFC7852]. The | |||
The body part is identified by its MIME media type ('application/ | body part is identified by its MIME media type ('application/ | |||
emergencyCallData.VEDS+xml') in the Content-Type header field of the | emergencyCallData.VEDS+xml') in the Content-Type header field of the | |||
body part. The body part is assigned a unique identifier which is | body part. The body part is assigned a unique identifier which is | |||
listed in a Content-ID header field in the body part. The SIP | listed in a Content-ID header field in the body part. The SIP | |||
message is marked as containing the VEDS data by adding (or appending | message is marked as containing the VEDS data by adding (or appending | |||
to) a Call-Info header field at the top level of the SIP message. | to) a Call-Info header field at the top level of the SIP message. | |||
This Call-Info header field contains a CID URL referencing the body | This Call-Info header field contains a CID URL referencing the body | |||
part's unique identifier, and a 'purpose' parameter identifying the | part's unique identifier, and a 'purpose' parameter identifying the | |||
data as a VEDS data block per the Emergency Call Additional Data | data as a VEDS data block per the Emergency Call Additional Data | |||
Blocks registry entry; the 'purpose' parameter's value is | Types registry entry; the 'purpose' parameter's value is | |||
'emergencyCallData.VEDS'. A VEDS data block is carried in a SIP INFO | 'emergencyCallData.VEDS'. A VEDS data block is carried in a SIP INFO | |||
request by using the INFO package defined in Section 12. | request by using the SIP INFO package defined in Section 14.8. | |||
A PSAP or IVS transmits a metadata/control object (see | A PSAP or IVS transmits a metadata/control object (see | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]) by attaching it to a SIP message as a MIME | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]) by including it in a SIP message as a MIME | |||
body part per [RFC7852]. The body part is identified by its MIME | body part per [RFC7852]. The body part is identified by its MIME | |||
media type ('application/emergencyCallData.control+xml') in the | media type ('application/emergencyCallData.control+xml') in the | |||
Content-Type header field of the body part. The body part is | Content-Type header field of the body part. The body part is | |||
assigned a unique identifier which is listed in a Content-ID header | assigned a unique identifier which is listed in a Content-ID header | |||
field in the body part. The SIP message is marked as containing the | field in the body part. The SIP message is marked as containing the | |||
metadata/control block by adding (or appending to) a Call-Info header | metadata/control block by adding (or appending to) a Call-Info header | |||
field at the top level of the SIP message. This Call-Info header | field at the top level of the SIP message. This Call-Info header | |||
field contains a CID URL referencing the body part's unique | field contains a CID URL referencing the body part's unique | |||
identifier, and a 'purpose' parameter identifying the data as a | identifier, and a 'purpose' parameter identifying the data as a | |||
metadata/control block per the Emergency Call Additional Data Blocks | metadata/control block per the Emergency Call Additional Data Types | |||
registry entry; the 'purpose' parameter's value is | registry entry; the 'purpose' parameter's value is | |||
'emergencyCallData.control'. A metadata/control object is carried in | 'emergencyCallData.control'. A metadata/control object is carried in | |||
a SIP INFO request by using the INFO package defined in Section 12. | a SIP INFO request by using the SIP INFO package defined in | |||
Section 14.8. | ||||
A body part containing a VEDS or metadata/control object has a | A body part containing a VEDS or metadata/control object has a | |||
Content-Disposition header field value containing "By-Reference" and | Content-Disposition header field value containing "By-Reference" and | |||
is always enclosed in a multipart body part (even if it would | is always enclosed in a multipart body part (even if it would | |||
otherwise be the only body part in the SIP message), since as of the | otherwise be the only body part in the SIP message), since as of the | |||
date of this document, the use of Content-ID as a SIP header field is | date of this document, the use of Content-ID as a SIP header field is | |||
not defined (while it is defined for use as a MIME header field). | not defined (while it is defined for use as a MIME header field). | |||
An In-Vehicle System (IVS) initiating an NG-ACN call includes in the | An In-Vehicle System (IVS) initiating an NG-ACN call includes in the | |||
initial INVITE a VEDS data block and a metadata/control object | initial INVITE a VEDS data block and a metadata/control object | |||
informing the PSAP of its capabilities. The VEDS and metadata/ | informing the PSAP of its capabilities. The VEDS and metadata/ | |||
control body parts (and PIDF-LO) have a Content-Disposition header | control body parts (and PIDF-LO) have a Content-Disposition header | |||
field with the value "By-Reference; handling=optional". Specifying | field with the value "By-Reference; handling=optional". Specifying | |||
handling=optional prevents the INVITE from being rejected if it is | handling=optional prevents the INVITE from being rejected if it is | |||
processed by a legacy element (e.g., a gateway between SIP and | processed by a legacy element (e.g., a gateway between SIP and | |||
circuit-switched environments) that does not understand the VEDS or | circuit-switched environments) that does not understand the VEDS or | |||
metadata/control (or PIDF-LO) objects. The PSAP creates a metadata/ | metadata/control (or PIDF-LO) objects. The PSAP creates a metadata/ | |||
control object acknowledging receipt of the VEDS data and includes it | control object acknowledging receipt of the VEDS data and includes it | |||
in the SIP final response to the INVITE. The metadata/control object | in the SIP final response to the INVITE. The metadata/control object | |||
is not attached to provisional (e.g., 180) responses. | is not included in provisional (e.g., 180) responses. | |||
If the IVS receives an acknowledgment for a VEDS data object with | If the IVS receives an acknowledgment for a VEDS data object with | |||
received=false, this indicates that the PSAP was unable to properly | received=false, this indicates that the PSAP was unable to properly | |||
decode or process the VEDS. The IVS action is not defined (e.g., it | decode or process the VEDS. The IVS action is not defined (e.g., it | |||
might only log an error). Since the PSAP is able to request an | might only log an error). Since the PSAP is able to request an | |||
updated VEDS during the call, if an initial VEDS is unsatisfactory in | updated VEDS during the call, if an initial VEDS is unsatisfactory in | |||
any way, the PSAP can choose to request another one. | any way, the PSAP can choose to request another one. | |||
A PSAP can request that the vehicle send an updated VEDS data block | A PSAP can request that the vehicle send an updated VEDS data block | |||
during a call. To do so, the PSAP creates a metadata/control object | during a call. To do so, the PSAP creates a metadata/control object | |||
requesting VEDS data and attaches it to a SIP INFO request and sends | requesting VEDS data and includes it as a body part of a SIP INFO | |||
it within the dialog. The IVS then attaches an updated VEDS data | request sent within the dialog. The IVS then includes an updated | |||
object to a SIP INFO request and sends it within the dialog. If the | VEDS data object as a body part of a SIP INFO request and sends it | |||
IVS is unable to send the VEDS, it instead sends a metadata/control | within the dialog. If the IVS is unable to send the VEDS, it instead | |||
object acknowledging the request with the 'success' parameter set to | sends a metadata/control object acknowledging the request with the | |||
'false' and a 'reason' parameter (and optionally a 'details' | 'success' parameter set to 'false' and a 'reason' parameter (and | |||
parameter) indicating why the request cannot be accomplished. Per | optionally a 'details' parameter) indicating why the request cannot | |||
[RFC6086], metadata/control objects and VEDS data are sent using the | be accomplished. Per [RFC6086], metadata/control objects and VEDS | |||
INFO package defined in Section 12. In addition, to align with the | data are sent using the SIP INFO package defined in Section 14.8. In | |||
way a VEDS or metadata/control block is transmitted in a SIP message | addition, to align with the way a VEDS or metadata/control block is | |||
other than an INFO request, one or more Call-Info header fields are | transmitted in a SIP message other than a SIP INFO request, one or | |||
included in the SIP INFO request to reference the VEDS or metadata/ | more Call-Info header fields are included in the SIP INFO request | |||
control block. See Section 12 for more information on the use of | referencing the VEDS or metadata/control block. See Section 14.8 for | |||
INFO requests within NG-ACN calls. | more information on the use of SIP INFO requests within NG-ACN calls. | |||
Any metadata/control object sent by a PSAP can request that the | Any metadata/control object sent by a PSAP can request that the | |||
vehicle perform an action (such as sending a data block, flashing | vehicle perform an action (such as sending a data block, flashing | |||
lights, providing a camera feed, etc.) The vehicle sends an | lights, providing a camera feed, etc.) The vehicle sends an | |||
acknowledgement for any request other than a successfully executed | acknowledgement for any request other than a successfully executed | |||
send-data action. Multiple requests with the same 'action' value | send-data action. Multiple requests with the same 'action' value | |||
MUST be sent in separate body parts (to avoid any ambiguity in the | MUST be sent in separate body parts (to avoid any ambiguity in the | |||
acknowledgement). | acknowledgement). | |||
If the IVS is aware that VEDS data it sent previously has changed, it | If the IVS is aware that VEDS data it sent previously has changed, it | |||
MAY send an unsolicited VEDS in any convenient SIP message, including | MAY send an unsolicited VEDS in any convenient SIP message, including | |||
an INFO request during the call. The PSAP sends an acknowledgment | a SIP INFO request during the call. The PSAP sends an acknowledgment | |||
for an unsolicited VEDS object (if the IVS sent the unsolicited VEDS | for an unsolicited VEDS object (if the IVS sent the unsolicited VEDS | |||
in an INFO request, the acknowledgment is sent in a new INFO request, | in a SIP INFO request, the acknowledgment is sent in a new SP INFO | |||
otherwise it is sent in the response to the message containing the | request, otherwise it is sent in the reply to the SIP request | |||
VEDS). | containing the VEDS). | |||
8. Call Setup | 8. Call Setup | |||
A next-generation In-Vehicle System (IVS) initiates an NG-ACN call | A next-generation In-Vehicle System (IVS) initiating an NG-ACN call | |||
with a SIP INVITE using one of the SOS sub-services | sends a SIP INVITE request using one of the SOS sub-services | |||
"SOS.ecall.automatic" or "SOS.ecall.manual" in the Request-URI, | "SOS.ecall.automatic" or "SOS.ecall.manual" in the Request-URI. This | |||
standard sets of crash data and capabilities data encoded in | SIP INVITE request includes standard sets of both crash and | |||
standardized and registered formats, attached as additional data | capabilities data as described in Section 7. | |||
blocks as specified in Section 4.1 of [RFC7852]. As described in | ||||
that document, each data block is identified by its MIME media type, | ||||
and pointed to by a CID URL in a Call-Info header with a 'purpose' | ||||
parameter value corresponding to the data block. | ||||
When placing an emergency call, the crash data set and IVS capability | ||||
data are transported as described in Section 7. | ||||
The Vehicle Emergency Data Set (VEDS) is an XML structure defined by | ||||
the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and | ||||
the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) [VEDS]. It is | ||||
carried in a body part with MIME media type 'application/ | ||||
EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml'. | ||||
Entities along the path between the vehicle and the PSAP are able to | Entities along the path between the vehicle and the PSAP are able to | |||
identify the call as an ACN call and handle it appropriately. The | identify the call as an ACN call and handle it appropriately. The | |||
PSAP is able to identify the crash and capabilities data attached to | PSAP is able to identify the crash and capabilities data included in | |||
the INVITE by examining the Call-Info header fields for 'purpose' | the SIP INVITE request by examining the Call-Info header fields for | |||
parameters whose values start with 'EmergencyCallData.' The PSAP is | 'purpose' parameters whose values start with 'EmergencyCallData.' | |||
able to access the data it is capable of handling and is interested | The PSAP is able to access the data it is capable of handling and is | |||
in by checking the 'purpose' parameter values. | interested in by checking the 'purpose' parameter values. | |||
This document extends [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] by reusing the call set- | This document extends [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] by reusing the call set- | |||
up and other normative requirements with the exception that in this | up and other normative requirements with the exception that in this | |||
document, support for the eCall MSD is OPTIONAL and support for VEDS | document, support for the eCall MSD is OPTIONAL and support for VEDS | |||
in REQUIRED. This document also adds new attribute values to the | in REQUIRED. This document also adds new attribute values to the | |||
metadata/control object defined in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. | metadata/control object defined in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. | |||
9. Call Routing | 9. New Metadata/Control Values | |||
An Emergency Services IP Network (ESInet) is a network operated by or | ||||
on behalf of emergency services authorities. It handles emergency | ||||
call routing and processing before delivery to a PSAP. In the | ||||
NG9-1-1 architecture adopted by NENA as well as the NG1-1-2 | ||||
architecture adopted by EENA, each PSAP is connected to one or more | ||||
ESInets. Each originating network is also connected to one or more | ||||
ESInets. The ESInets maintain policy-based routing rules that | ||||
control the routing and processing of emergency calls. The | ||||
centralization of such rules within ESInets allows for a cleaner | ||||
separation between the responsibilities of the originating network | ||||
and that of the emergency services network, and provides greater | ||||
flexibility and control over processing of emergency calls by the | ||||
emergency services authorities and PSAPs. This can make it easier to | ||||
react quickly to situations that require changes in how emergency | ||||
calls are routed or handled (e.g., a natural disaster closes a PSAP), | ||||
as well as ease in making long-term changes that affect such routing | ||||
(e.g., cooperative agreements to specially handle calls requiring | ||||
translation or relay services). | ||||
In an environment that uses ESInets, the originating network might | ||||
pass all types of emergency calls to an ESInet (all calls with a | ||||
service URN of or starting with "sos"). The ESInet then routs such | ||||
calls to an appropriate PSAP. In an environment without an ESInet, | ||||
the emergency services authorities and the originating carriers | ||||
determine how such calls are routed. | ||||
10. New Metadata/Control Values | ||||
This document adds new attribute values to the metadata/control | This document adds new attribute values to the metadata/control | |||
structure defined in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. | structure defined in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. | |||
In addition to the base usage from the PSAP to the IVS to | In addition to the base usage from the PSAP to the IVS to | |||
acknowledge receipt of crash data, the <ack> element is also | acknowledge receipt of crash data, the <ack> element is also | |||
contained in a metadata/control block sent by the IVS to the PSAP. | contained in a metadata/control block sent by the IVS to the PSAP. | |||
This is used by the IVS to acknowledge receipt of a request by the | This is used by the IVS to acknowledge receipt of a request by the | |||
PSAP and indicate if the request was carried out when that request | PSAP and indicate if the request was carried out when that request | |||
would not otherwise be acknowledged (if the PSAP requests the | would not otherwise be acknowledged (if the PSAP requests the | |||
skipping to change at page 18, line 33 ¶ | skipping to change at page 17, line 19 ¶ | |||
the actions supported by the IVS. | the actions supported by the IVS. | |||
The <request> element contains attributes to indicate the request and | The <request> element contains attributes to indicate the request and | |||
to supply any needed information, and MAY contain a <text> child | to supply any needed information, and MAY contain a <text> child | |||
element to contain the text for a dynamic message. The 'action' | element to contain the text for a dynamic message. The 'action' | |||
attribute is mandatory and indicates the specific action. | attribute is mandatory and indicates the specific action. | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] established an IANA registry to contain the | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] established an IANA registry to contain the | |||
allowed values; this document adds new values to that registry in | allowed values; this document adds new values to that registry in | |||
Table 2. | Table 2. | |||
Per [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], the PSAP sends a control/metadata block | Per [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], the PSAP sends a metadata/control block | |||
in response to the VEDS data sent by the IVS in SIP requests other | in response to the VEDS data sent by the IVS in SIP requests other | |||
than INFO (e.g., the INVITE). This metadata/control block is sent in | than INFO (e.g., the INVITE). This metadata/control block is sent in | |||
the SIP response to the request (e.g., the INVITE response). When | the SIP response to the request (e.g., the INVITE response). When | |||
the PSAP needs to send a control block that is not an immediate | the PSAP needs to send a control block that is not an immediate | |||
response to a VEDS or other data sent by the IVS, the control block | response to a VEDS or other data sent by the IVS, the metadata/ | |||
is transmitted from the PSAP to the IVS in a SIP INFO request within | control block is transmitted from the PSAP to the IVS in a SIP INFO | |||
the established dialog. The IVS sends the requested data (e.g., the | request within the established dialog. The IVS sends the requested | |||
VEDS) or an acknowledgment (for requests other than to send data) in | data (e.g., the VEDS) or an acknowledgment (for requests other than | |||
a new INFO request. This mechanism flexibly allows the PSAP to send | to send data or to indicate an inability to send the requested data) | |||
metadata/control data to the IVS and the IVS to respond. If control | in a new SIP INFO request. This mechanism flexibly allows the PSAP | |||
data sent in a response message requests the IVS to send a new VEDS | to send metadata/control data to the IVS and the IVS to respond. If | |||
or other data block, or to perform an action other than sending data, | a metadata/control block sent in a SIP response message requests the | |||
the IVS sends the requested data or an acknowledgment regarding the | IVS to send a new VEDS or other data block, or to perform an action | |||
action in an INFO message within the dialog. | other than sending data, the IVS sends the requested data or an | |||
acknowledgment regarding the action in a SIP INFO request within the | ||||
dialog. | ||||
10.1. New values for the 'action' attribute' | 9.1. New values for the 'action' attribute' | |||
The following new "action" values are defined: | The following new "action" values are defined: | |||
msg-static displays or plays a predefined message (translated as | msg-static displays or plays a predefined message (translated as | |||
appropriate for the language of the vehicle's interface). A | appropriate for the language of the vehicle's interface). A | |||
registry is created in Section 16.4 for messages and their IDs. | registry is created in Section 14.4 for messages and their IDs. | |||
Vehicles include the highest registered message in their | Vehicles include the highest registered message in their | |||
<capabilities> element to indicate support for all messages up to | <capabilities> element to indicate support for all messages up to | |||
and including the indicated value. | and including the indicated value. A registry of message | |||
identification values is defined in Section 14.4. There is only | ||||
one static message initially defined (listed in Table 3). Because | ||||
all compliant vehicles are expected to support all static messages | ||||
translated into all languages supported by the vehicle, it is | ||||
important to limit the number of such messages. Therefore, this | ||||
registry operates under "Specification Required" rules as defined | ||||
in [RFC5226], which require a stable, public document and implies | ||||
expert review of the publication. | ||||
msg-dynamic displays or speaks (via text-to-speech) a dynamic | msg-dynamic displays or speaks (via text-to-speech) a dynamic | |||
message included in the request. | message contained in a child <text> element within the request. | |||
honk sounds the horn. | honk sounds the horn. | |||
lamp turns a lamp (light) on, off, or flashes. | lamp turns a lamp (light) on, off, or flashes. The lamp is | |||
identified by a lamp ID token contained in an "element-id" | ||||
attribute of the request. The desired state of the lamp is | ||||
indicated by a lamp state token contained in a "requested-state" | ||||
attribute. The duration of the lamp's requested state is | ||||
specified in a "persistence" attribute. A registry of lamp | ||||
identification values is defined in Section 14.5. The initial | ||||
values (listed in Table 4) are head, interior, fog-front, fog- | ||||
rear, brake, brake-center, position-front, position-rear, turn- | ||||
left, turn-right, and hazard. A registry of lamp states is | ||||
defined in Section 14.6. The initial values (listed in Table 5) | ||||
are "on", "off", and "flash". | ||||
enable-camera adds a one-way media stream (established via SIP re- | enable-camera adds a one-way media stream (established via SIP re- | |||
INVITE sent by the vehicle) to enable the PSAP call taker to view | INVITE sent by the vehicle) to enable the PSAP call taker to view | |||
a feed from a camera. | a feed from a camera. A registry of camera identification values | |||
is defined in Section 14.7. The initial values (listed in | ||||
Table 6) are backup, left-rear, right-rear, forward, rear-wide, | ||||
lane, interior, and night-front. | ||||
Note that there is no 'request' action to play dynamic media (such as | Note that there is no 'request' action to play dynamic media (such as | |||
an audio message). The PSAP can send a SIP re-INVITE to establish a | an audio message). The PSAP can send a SIP re-INVITE to establish a | |||
one-way media stream for this purpose. | one-way media stream for this purpose. | |||
10.2. Request Example | 9.2. Request Example | |||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | |||
<EmergencyCallData.control | <EmergencyCallData.control | |||
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:EmergencyCallData:control" | xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:EmergencyCallData:control" | |||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | |||
<request action="send-data" datatype="VEDS"/> | <request action="send-data" datatype="VEDS"/> | |||
<request action="lamp" lamp-id="hazard" | <request action="lamp" element-id="hazard" | |||
lamp-action="flash" persistance="PT1H"/> | requested-state="flash" persistence="PT1H"/> | |||
<request action="msg-static" msgid="1"/> | <request action="msg-static" int-id="1"/> | |||
<request action="msg-dynamic"> | <request action="msg-dynamic"> | |||
<text>Remain calm. Help is on the way.</text> | <text>Remain calm. Help is on the way.</text> | |||
</request> | </request> | |||
</EmergencyCallData.control> | </EmergencyCallData.control> | |||
Figure 7: Request Example | Figure 7: Request Example | |||
10.3. The <ack> element | 9.3. The <ack> element | |||
In [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], the <ack> element is transmitted by the | In [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], the <ack> element is transmitted by the | |||
PSAP to acknowledge the MSD. Here, the <ack> element is also | PSAP to acknowledge the MSD. Here, the <ack> element is also | |||
transmitted by the PSAP to acknowledge the VEDS data and by the IVS | transmitted by the PSAP to acknowledge the VEDS data and by the IVS | |||
to acknowledge receipt of a <request> element that requested the IVS | to acknowledge receipt of a <request> element that requested the IVS | |||
to perform an action other than transmitting a data object (e.g., a | to perform an action other than transmitting a data object (e.g., a | |||
request to display a message would be acknowledged, but a request to | request to display a message would be acknowledged, but a request to | |||
transmit VEDS data would not result in a separate <ack> element being | transmit VEDS data would not result in a separate <ack> element being | |||
sent, since the data object itself serves as acknowledgment.) An | sent, since the data object itself serves as acknowledgment.) An | |||
<ack> element sent by an IVS references the unique ID of the | <ack> element sent by an IVS references the unique ID of the | |||
metadata/control object containing the request(s) and indicates | metadata/control object containing the request(s) and indicates | |||
whether the request was successfully performed, and if not, | whether the request was successfully performed, and if not, | |||
optionally includes an explanation. | optionally includes an explanation. | |||
10.3.1. Ack Examples | 9.3.1. Ack Examples | |||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | |||
<EmergencyCallData.control | <EmergencyCallData.control | |||
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:EmergencyCallData:control" | xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:EmergencyCallData:control" | |||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | |||
<ack ref="1234567890@atlanta.example.com"> | <ack ref="1234567890@atlanta.example.com"> | |||
<actionResult action="msg-dynamic" success="true"/> | <actionResult action="msg-dynamic" success="true"/> | |||
<actionResult action="lamp" success="false" reason="unable" | <actionResult action="lamp" success="false" reason="unable" | |||
details="The requested lamp is inoperable"/> | details="The requested lamp is inoperable"/> | |||
</ack> | </ack> | |||
</EmergencyCallData.control> | </EmergencyCallData.control> | |||
Figure 8: Ack Example from IVS to PSAP | Figure 8: Ack Example from IVS to PSAP | |||
10.4. The <capabilities> element | 9.4. The <capabilities> element | |||
The <capabilities> element ([I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]) is transmitted by | The <capabilities> element ([I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]) is transmitted by | |||
the IVS to indicate its capabilities to the PSAP. | the IVS to indicate its capabilities to the PSAP. | |||
The <capabilities> element contains a <request> child element per | The <capabilities> element contains a <request> child element per | |||
action supported by the vehicle. The vehicle MUST support sending | action supported by the vehicle. The vehicle MUST support sending | |||
the VEDS data object and so includes at a minimum a <request> child | the VEDS data object and so includes at a minimum a <request> child | |||
element with the 'action' attribute set to "send-data" and the | element with the 'action' attribute set to "send-data" and the | |||
'supported-values' attribute containing all data blocks supported by | 'supported-values' attribute containing all data blocks supported by | |||
the IV, which MUST include 'VEDS'. All other actions are OPTIONAL. | the IVS, which MUST include 'VEDS'. All other actions are OPTIONAL. | |||
If the "msg-static" action is supported, a <request> child element | If the "msg-static" action is supported, a <request> child element | |||
with the 'action' attribute set to "msg-static" is included, with the | with the 'action' attribute set to "msg-static" is included, with the | |||
'msgid' attribute set to the highest supported static message | 'int-id' attribute set to the highest supported static message | |||
supported by the vehicle. A registry is created in Section 16.4 to | supported by the vehicle. A registry is created in Section 14.4 to | |||
map 'msgid' values to static text messages. By sending the highest | map 'int-id' values to static text messages. By sending the highest | |||
supported static message number in its <capabilities> element, the | supported static message number in its <capabilities> element, the | |||
vehicle indicates its support for all static messages in the registry | vehicle indicates its support for all static messages in the registry | |||
up to and including that value. | up to and including that value. | |||
If the "lamp" action is supported, a <request> child element with the | If the "lamp" action is supported, a <request> child element with the | |||
'action' attribute set to "lamp" is included, with the 'supported- | 'action' attribute set to "lamp" is included, with the 'supported- | |||
values' attribute set to all supported lamp IDs. A registry is | values' attribute set to all supported lamp IDs. A registry is | |||
created in Section 16.5 to contain lamp ID values. | created in Section 14.5 to contain lamp ID values. | |||
If the "enable-camera" action is supported, a <request> child element | If the "enable-camera" action is supported, a <request> child element | |||
with the 'action' attribute set to "enable-camera" is included, with | with the 'action' attribute set to "enable-camera" is included, with | |||
the 'supported-values' attribute set to all supported camera IDs. A | the 'supported-values' attribute set to all supported camera IDs. A | |||
registry is created in Section 16.6 to contain camera ID values. | registry is created in Section 14.7 to contain camera ID values. | |||
10.4.1. Capabilities Example | 9.4.1. Capabilities Example | |||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | |||
<EmergencyCallData.control | <EmergencyCallData.control | |||
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:EmergencyCallData:control" | xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:EmergencyCallData:control" | |||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | |||
<capabilities> | <capabilities> | |||
<request action="send-data" supported-values="VEDS"/> | <request action="send-data" supported-values="VEDS"/> | |||
<request action="lamp" | <request action="lamp" | |||
supported-values="head;interior;fog-front; | supported-values="head;interior;fog-front; | |||
fog-rear;brake;position-front;position-rear; | fog-rear;brake;position-front;position-rear; | |||
turn-left;turn-right;hazard"/> | turn-left;turn-right;hazard"/> | |||
<request action="msg-static" msgid="3"/> | <request action="msg-static" int-id="3"/> | |||
<request action="msg-dynamic"/> | <request action="msg-dynamic"/> | |||
<request action="honk"/> | <request action="honk"/> | |||
<request action="enable-camera" | <request action="enable-camera" | |||
supported-values="backup; interior"/> | supported-values="backup; interior"/> | |||
</capabilities> | </capabilities> | |||
</EmergencyCallData.control> | </EmergencyCallData.control> | |||
Figure 9: Capabilities Example | Figure 9: Capabilities Example | |||
11. Test Calls | 10. Test Calls | |||
An NG-ACN test call is a call that is recognized and treated to some | An NG-ACN test call is a call that is recognized and treated to some | |||
extent as an NG-ACN call but not given emergency call treatment and | extent as an NG-ACN call but not given emergency call treatment and | |||
not handled by a call taker. The specific handling of test NG-ACN | not handled by a call taker. The specific handling of test NG-ACN | |||
calls is not itself standardized; the test call facility is intended | calls is not itself standardized; the test call facility is intended | |||
to allow the IVS, user, or TSP to verify that an NG-ACN call can be | to allow the IVS, user, or TSP to verify that an NG-ACN call can be | |||
successfully established with voice and/or other media communication. | successfully established with voice and/or other media communication. | |||
The IVS might also be able to verify that the crash data was | The IVS might also be able to verify that the crash data was | |||
successfully received. | successfully received. | |||
skipping to change at page 22, line 34 ¶ | skipping to change at page 22, line 17 ¶ | |||
successfully processed) in addition to supporting media loopback per | successfully processed) in addition to supporting media loopback per | |||
[RFC6881]). | [RFC6881]). | |||
Note that since test calls are placed using "test" as the parent | Note that since test calls are placed using "test" as the parent | |||
service URN and "sos" as a child, such calls are not treated as an | service URN and "sos" as a child, such calls are not treated as an | |||
emergency call and so some functionality might not apply (such as | emergency call and so some functionality might not apply (such as | |||
preemption or service availability for devices lacking service ("non- | preemption or service availability for devices lacking service ("non- | |||
service-initialized" or "NSI" devices) if those are available for | service-initialized" or "NSI" devices) if those are available for | |||
emergency calls). | emergency calls). | |||
12. The emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS INFO package | 11. Example | |||
This document registers the 'emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS' INFO | ||||
package. | ||||
Both endpoints (the IVS and the PSAP equipment) include | ||||
'emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS' in a Recv-Info header field per | ||||
[RFC6086] to indicate ability to receive INFO messages carrying data | ||||
as described here. | ||||
Support for the 'emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS' INFO package indicates | ||||
the ability to receive NG-ACN related body parts as specified in | ||||
[TBD: THIS DOCUMENT]. | ||||
An INFO request message carrying data related to an emergency call as | ||||
described in [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] has an Info-Package header field | ||||
set to 'emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS' per [RFC6086]. | ||||
The requirements of Section 10 of [RFC6086] are addressed in the | ||||
following sections. | ||||
12.1. Overall Description | ||||
This section describes "what type of information is carried in INFO | ||||
requests associated with the Info Package, and for what types of | ||||
applications and functionalities UAs can use the Info Package." | ||||
INFO requests associated with the emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS INFO | ||||
package carry data associated with emergency calls as defined in | ||||
[TBD: THIS DOCUMENT]. The application is vehicle-initiated emergency | ||||
calls established using SIP. The functionality is to carry vehicle | ||||
data and metadata/control information between vehicles and PSAPs. | ||||
Refer to [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] for more information. | ||||
12.2. Applicability | ||||
This section describes "why the Info Package mechanism, rather than | ||||
some other mechanism, has been chosen for the specific use-case...." | ||||
The use of INFO is based on an analysis of the requirements against | ||||
the intent and effects of INFO versus other approaches (which | ||||
included SIP MESSAGE, SIP OPTIONS, SIP re-INVITE, media plane | ||||
transport, and non-SIP protocols). In particular, the transport of | ||||
emergency call data blocks occurs within a SIP emergency dialog, per | ||||
Section 7, and is normally carried in the initial INVITE and its | ||||
response; the use of INFO only occurs when emergency-call-related | ||||
data needs to be sent mid-call. While MESSAGE could be used, it is | ||||
not tied to a SIP dialog as is INFO and thus might not be associated | ||||
with the dialog. SIP OPTIONS or re-INVITE could also be used, but is | ||||
seen as less clean than INFO. SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY could be coerced into | ||||
service, but the semantics are not a good fit, e.g., the subscribe/ | ||||
notify mechanism provides one-way communication consisting of (often | ||||
multiple) notifications from notifier to subscriber indicating that | ||||
certain events in notifier have occurred, whereas what's needed here | ||||
is two-way communication of data related to the emergency dialog. | ||||
Use of the media plane mechanisms was discounted because the number | ||||
of messages needing to be exchanged in a dialog is normally zero or | ||||
very few, and the size of the data is likewise very small. The | ||||
overhead caused by user plane setup (e.g., to use MSRP as transport) | ||||
would be disproportionately large. | ||||
Based on the the analyses, the SIP INFO method was chosen to provide | ||||
for mid-call data transport. | ||||
12.3. Info Package Name | ||||
The info package name is emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS | ||||
12.4. Info Package Parameters | ||||
None | ||||
12.5. SIP Option-Tags | ||||
None | ||||
12.6. INFO Request Body Parts | ||||
The body for an emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS info package is a | ||||
multipart body which MAY contain zero or one application/ | ||||
emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS+xml (containing a VEDS data block) part, | ||||
zero or more application/emergencyCallData.control+xml (containing a | ||||
metadata/control object) parts, and zero or one application/ | ||||
emergencyCallData.eCall.MSD+per (containing an MSD) part. At least | ||||
one VEDS, MSD, or metadata/control body part is expected; the | ||||
behavior upon receiving an INFO request with none is undefined. | ||||
The body parts are sent per [RFC6086], and in addition, to align with | ||||
with how these body parts are sent in non-INFO messages, each | ||||
associated body part is referenced by a Call-Info header field at the | ||||
top level of the SIP message. The body part has a Content- | ||||
Disposition header field set to "By-Reference". | ||||
A VEDS or metadata/control block is always enclosed in a multipart | ||||
body part (even if it would otherwise be the only body part in the | ||||
SIP message), since as of the date of this document, the use of | ||||
Content-ID as a SIP header field is not defined (while it is defined | ||||
for use as a MIME header field). The innermost multipart that | ||||
contains only body parts associated with the INFO package has a | ||||
Content-Disposition value of Info-Package. | ||||
Service providers are not expected to attach [RFC7852] Additional | ||||
Data to an INFO request. | ||||
See [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] for more information. | ||||
12.7. Info Package Usage Restrictions | ||||
Usage is limited to vehicle-initiated emergency calls as defined in | ||||
[TBD: THIS DOCUMENT]. | ||||
12.8. Rate of INFO Requests | ||||
The SIP INFO request is used within an established emergency call | ||||
dialog for the PSAP to request the IVS to send an updated data set, | ||||
and for the IVS to send the requested data set. Because this is | ||||
normally done only on manual request of the PSAP call taker (who | ||||
suspects some aspect of the vehicle state has changed), the rate of | ||||
SIP INFO requests associated with the emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS | ||||
info package is normally quite low (most dialogs are likely to | ||||
contain zero INFO requests, while others can be expected to carry an | ||||
occasional request). | ||||
12.9. Info Package Security Considerations | ||||
The MIME media type registations for the data blocks that can be | ||||
carried using this INFO package contains a discussion of the security | ||||
and/or privacy considerations specific to that data block. The | ||||
"Security Considerations" and "Privacy Considerations" sections of | ||||
[TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] discuss security and privacy considerations of | ||||
the data carried in vehicle-initiated emergency calls as described in | ||||
that document. | ||||
12.10. Implementation Details | ||||
See [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] for protocol details. | ||||
12.11. Examples | ||||
See [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] for protocol examples. | ||||
13. Example | ||||
Figure 10 shows an NG-ACN call routing. The mobile network operator | Figure 10 shows an NG-ACN call routing. The mobile network operator | |||
(MNO) routes the call to an Emergency services IP Network (ESInet), | (MNO) routes the call to an Emergency services IP Network (ESInet), | |||
as for any emergency call. The ESInet routes the call to an | as for any emergency call. The ESInet routes the call to an | |||
appropriate NG-ACN-capable PSAP (using location information and the | appropriate NG-ACN-capable PSAP (using location information and the | |||
fact that that it is an NG-ACN call). The call is processed by the | fact that that it is an NG-ACN call). The call is processed by the | |||
Emergency Services Routing Proxy (ESRP), as the entry point to the | Emergency Services Routing Proxy (ESRP), as the entry point to the | |||
ESInet. The ESRP routes the call to an appropriate NG-ACN-capable | ESInet. The ESRP routes the call to an appropriate NG-ACN-capable | |||
PSAP, where the call is received by a call taker. (In deployments | PSAP, where the call is received by a call taker. (In deployments | |||
where there is no ESInet, the MNO itself routes the call directly to | where there is no ESInet, the MNO itself routes the call directly to | |||
skipping to change at page 26, line 26 ¶ | skipping to change at page 23, line 6 ¶ | |||
| +-------+ | | | +-------+ | | |||
| | | | | | |||
| | | | | | |||
| | | | | | |||
| ESInet | | | ESInet | | |||
+---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
Figure 10: Example of Vehicle-Placed Emergency Call Message Flow | Figure 10: Example of Vehicle-Placed Emergency Call Message Flow | |||
The example, shown in Figure 11, illustrates a SIP emergency call | The example, shown in Figure 11, illustrates a SIP emergency call | |||
INVITE with location information (a PIDF-LO), VEDS crash data (a VEDS | INVITE request with location information (a PIDF-LO), VEDS crash data | |||
data block), and capabilities data (a metadata/control block with | (a VEDS data block), and capabilities data (a metadata/control block | |||
extensions defined in this document) attached to the SIP INVITE | with extensions defined in this document) included in the SIP INVITE | |||
message. The INVITE has a request URI containing the | request message. The INVITE has a request URI containing the | |||
'urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic' service URN. | 'urn:service:sos.ecall.automatic' service URN. | |||
The example VEDS data structure shows information about about a | The example VEDS data structure shows information about a crashed | |||
crashed vehicle. The example communicates that the car is a model | vehicle. The example communicates that the car is a model year 2015 | |||
year 2015 Saab 9-5 (a car which does not exist). The front airbag | Saab 9-5 (a car which does not exist). The front airbag deployed as | |||
deployed as a consequence of the crash. The | a consequence of the crash. The 'VehicleBodyCategoryCode' indicates | |||
'VehicleBodyCategoryCode' indicates that the crashed vehicle is a | that the crashed vehicle is a passenger car (the code is set to | |||
passenger car (the code is set to '101') and that it is not a | '101') and that it is not a convertible (the 'ConvertibleIndicator' | |||
convertible (the 'ConvertibleIndicator' value is set to 'false'). | value is set to 'false'). | |||
The 'VehicleCrashPulse' element provides further information about | The 'VehicleCrashPulse' element provides further information about | |||
the crash, namely that the force of impact based on the change in | the crash, namely that the force of impact based on the change in | |||
velocity over the duration of the crash pulse was 100 MPH. The | velocity over the duration of the crash pulse was 100 MPH. The | |||
principal direction of the force of the impact is set to '12' (which | principal direction of the force of the impact is set to '12' (which | |||
refers to 12 O'Clock, corresponding to a frontal collision). This | refers to 12 O'Clock, corresponding to a frontal collision). This | |||
value is described in the 'CrashPulsePrincipalDirectionOfForceValue' | value is described in the 'CrashPulsePrincipalDirectionOfForceValue' | |||
element. | element. | |||
The 'CrashPulseRolloverQuarterTurnsValue' indicates the number of | The 'CrashPulseRolloverQuarterTurnsValue' indicates the number of | |||
skipping to change at page 30, line 37 ¶ | skipping to change at page 27, line 15 ¶ | |||
<EmergencyCallData.control | <EmergencyCallData.control | |||
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:EmergencyCallData:control" | xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:EmergencyCallData:control" | |||
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> | |||
<capabilities> | <capabilities> | |||
<request action="send-data" supported-datatypes="VEDS"/> | <request action="send-data" supported-datatypes="VEDS"/> | |||
<request action="lamp" | <request action="lamp" | |||
supported-values="head;interior;fog-front;fog-rear; | supported-values="head;interior;fog-front;fog-rear; | |||
brake;position-front;position-rear;turn-left; | brake;position-front;position-rear;turn-left; | |||
turn-right;hazard"/> | turn-right;hazard"/> | |||
<request action="msg-static" msgid="3"/> | <request action="msg-static" int-id="3"/> | |||
<request action="msg-dynamic"/> | <request action="msg-dynamic"/> | |||
<request action="honk"/> | <request action="honk"/> | |||
<request action="enable-camera" | <request action="enable-camera" | |||
supported-values="backup; interior"/> | supported-values="backup; interior"/> | |||
</capabilities> | </capabilities> | |||
</EmergencyCallData.control> | </EmergencyCallData.control> | |||
--boundary1-- | --boundary1-- | |||
Figure 11: SIP INVITE for a Vehicle-Initated Emergency Call | Figure 11: SIP INVITE for a Vehicle-Initated Emergency Call | |||
14. Security Considerations | 12. Security Considerations | |||
Since this document relies on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] and [RFC7852], | Since this document relies on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] and [RFC7852], | |||
the security considerations described there and in [RFC5069] apply | the security considerations described there and in [RFC5069] apply | |||
here. Implementors are cautioned to read and understand the | here. Implementors are cautioned to read and understand the | |||
discussion in those documents. | discussion in those documents. | |||
As with emergency service systems where location data is supplied or | As with emergency service systems where location data is supplied or | |||
determined with the assistance of an end host, there is the | determined with the assistance of an end host, there is the | |||
possibility that that location is incorrect, either intentially | possibility that that location is incorrect, either intentially | |||
(e.g., in a denial of service attack against the emergency services | (e.g., in a denial of service attack against the emergency services | |||
skipping to change at page 31, line 28 ¶ | skipping to change at page 28, line 5 ¶ | |||
vulnerabilities. | vulnerabilities. | |||
In addition to the security considerations discussion specific to the | In addition to the security considerations discussion specific to the | |||
metadata/control object in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], note that vehicles | metadata/control object in [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], note that vehicles | |||
MAY decline to carry out any requested action (e.g., if the vehicle | MAY decline to carry out any requested action (e.g., if the vehicle | |||
requires but is unable to verify the certificate used to sign the | requires but is unable to verify the certificate used to sign the | |||
request). The vehicle MAY use any value in the reason registry to | request). The vehicle MAY use any value in the reason registry to | |||
indicate why it did not take an action (e.g., the generic "unable" or | indicate why it did not take an action (e.g., the generic "unable" or | |||
the more specific "security-failure"). | the more specific "security-failure"). | |||
15. Privacy Considerations | 13. Privacy Considerations | |||
Since this document builds on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which itself | Since this document builds on [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall], which itself | |||
builds on [RFC7852], the data structures specified there, and the | builds on [RFC7852], the data structures specified there, and the | |||
corresponding privacy considerations discussed there, apply here as | corresponding privacy considerations discussed there, apply here as | |||
well. The VEDS data structure contains optional elements that can | well. The VEDS data structure contains optional elements that can | |||
carry identifying and personal information, both about the vehicle | carry identifying and personal information, both about the vehicle | |||
and about the owner, as well as location information, and so needs to | and about the owner, as well as location information, and so needs to | |||
be protected against unauthorized disclosure, as discussed in | be protected against unauthorized disclosure, as discussed in | |||
[RFC7852]. Local regulations may impose additional privacy | [RFC7852]. Local regulations may impose additional privacy | |||
protection requirements. | protection requirements. | |||
The additional functionality enabled by this document, such as access | The additional functionality enabled by this document, such as access | |||
to vehicle camera streams, carries a burden of protection and so | to vehicle camera streams, carries a burden of protection and so | |||
implementations need to be careful that access is only provided | implementations need to be careful that access is only provided | |||
within the context of an emergency call or to an emergency services | within the context of an emergency call or to an emergency services | |||
provider (e.g., by verifying that the request for camera access is | provider (e.g., by verifying that the request for camera access is | |||
signed by a certificate issued by an emergency services registrar). | signed by a certificate issued by an emergency services registrar). | |||
16. IANA Considerations | 14. IANA Considerations | |||
This document registers the 'application/EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' MIME | This document registers the 'application/EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' MIME | |||
media type, and adds "VEDS" to the Emergency Call Additional Data | media type, and adds "VEDS" to the Emergency Call Data Types | |||
registry. This document adds to and creates sub-registries in the | registry. This document adds to and creates sub-registries in the | |||
"Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" registry created in | "Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" registry created in | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This document registers a new INFO package. | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This document registers a new SIP INFO | |||
package. | ||||
16.1. MIME Media Type Registration for 'application/ | 14.1. MIME Media Type Registration for 'application/ | |||
EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' | EmergencyCall.VEDS+xml' | |||
This specification requests the registration of a new MIME media type | This specification requests the registration of a new MIME media type | |||
according to the procedures of RFC 6838 [RFC6838] and guidelines in | according to the procedures of RFC 6838 [RFC6838] and guidelines in | |||
RFC 7303 [RFC7303]. | RFC 7303 [RFC7303]. | |||
MIME media type name: application | MIME media type name: application | |||
MIME subtype name: EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml | MIME subtype name: EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml | |||
skipping to change at page 32, line 37 ¶ | skipping to change at page 29, line 14 ¶ | |||
Security considerations: | Security considerations: | |||
This media type is designed to carry vehicle crash data during | This media type is designed to carry vehicle crash data during | |||
an emergency call. | an emergency call. | |||
This data can contain personal information including vehicle | This data can contain personal information including vehicle | |||
VIN, location, direction, etc. Appropriate precautions need to | VIN, location, direction, etc. Appropriate precautions need to | |||
be taken to limit unauthorized access, inappropriate disclosure | be taken to limit unauthorized access, inappropriate disclosure | |||
to third parties, and eavesdropping of this information. | to third parties, and eavesdropping of this information. | |||
Please refer to Section 7 and Section 8 of [RFC7852] for more | Please refer to Section 9 and Section 10 of [RFC7852] for more | |||
information. | information. | |||
When this media type is contained in a signed or encrypted body | When this media type is contained in a signed or encrypted body | |||
part, the enclosing multipart (e.g., multipart/signed or | part, the enclosing multipart (e.g., multipart/signed or | |||
multipart/encrypted) has the same Content-ID as the data part. | multipart/encrypted) has the same Content-ID as the data part. | |||
This allows an entity to identify and access the data blocks it | This allows an entity to identify and access the data blocks it | |||
is interested in without having to dive deeply into the message | is interested in without having to dive deeply into the message | |||
structure or decrypt parts it is not interested in. (The | structure or decrypt parts it is not interested in. (The | |||
'purpose' parameter in a Call-Info header field identifies the | 'purpose' parameter in a Call-Info header field identifies the | |||
data, and the CID URL points to the data block in the body, | data, and the CID URL points to the data block in the body, | |||
skipping to change at page 33, line 17 ¶ | skipping to change at page 29, line 42 ¶ | |||
Additional information: None | Additional information: None | |||
Magic Number: None | Magic Number: None | |||
File Extension: .xml | File Extension: .xml | |||
Macintosh file type code: 'TEXT' | Macintosh file type code: 'TEXT' | |||
Persons and email addresses for further information: Randall | Persons and email addresses for further information: Randall | |||
Gellensm rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org; Hannes Tschofenig, | Gellens rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org; Hannes Tschofenig, | |||
Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net | Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net | |||
Intended usage: LIMITED USE | Intended usage: LIMITED USE | |||
Author: This specification is a work item of the IETF ECRIT | Author: This specification is a work item of the IETF ECRIT | |||
working group, with mailing list address <ecrit@ietf.org>. | working group, with mailing list address <ecrit@ietf.org>. | |||
Change controller: The IESG <ietf@ietf.org> | Change controller: The IESG <ietf@ietf.org> | |||
16.2. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Additional | 14.2. Registration of the 'VEDS' entry in the Emergency Call Data Types | |||
Data registry | registry | |||
This specification requests IANA to add the 'VEDS' entry to the | This specification requests IANA to add the 'VEDS' entry to the | |||
Emergency Call Additional Data registry, with a reference to this | Emergency Call Data Types registry, with a reference to this | |||
document. The Emergency Call Additional Data registry was | document; the 'Data About' value is 'The Call'. The Emergency Call | |||
established by [RFC7852]. | Data types registry was established by [RFC7852]. | |||
16.3. New Action Values | 14.3. New Action Values | |||
This document adds new values for the 'action' attribute of the | This document adds new values for the 'action' attribute of the | |||
<request> element in the "Emergency Call Action" registry created by | <request> element in the "Emergency Call Action" registry created by | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. | |||
+---------------+--------------------------------------+ | +---------------+-------------------------------------+ | |||
| Name | Description | | | Name | Description | | |||
+---------------+--------------------------------------+ | +---------------+-------------------------------------+ | |||
| msg-static | Section 10.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | | msg-static | Section 9.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| msg-dynamic | Section 10.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | | msg-dynamic | Section 9.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| honk | Section 10.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | | honk | Section 9.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| lamp | Section 10.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | | lamp | Section 9.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| enable-camera | Section 10.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | | enable-camera | Section 9.1 of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] | | |||
+---------------+--------------------------------------+ | +---------------+-------------------------------------+ | |||
Table 2: Emergency Call Action Registry New Values | Table 2: Emergency Call Action Registry New Values | |||
16.4. Emergency Call Static Message Registry | 14.4. Emergency Call Static Message Registry | |||
This document creates a new sub-registry called "Emergency Call | This document creates a new sub-registry called "Emergency Call | |||
Static Message" in the "Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" | Static Message" in the "Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" | |||
registry established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. Because all | registry established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. Because all | |||
compliant vehicles are expected to support all static messages | compliant vehicles are expected to support all static messages | |||
translated into all languages supported by the vehicle, it is | translated into all languages supported by the vehicle, it is | |||
important to limit the number of such messages. As defined in | important to limit the number of such messages. As defined in | |||
[RFC5226], this registry operates under "Publication Required" rules, | [RFC5226], this registry operates under "Specification Required" | |||
which require a stable, public document and implies expert review of | rules, which require a stable, public document and implies expert | |||
the publication. The expert should determine that the document has | review of the publication. The expert should determine that the | |||
been published by an appropriate emergency services organization | document has been published by an appropriate emergency services | |||
(e.g., NENA, EENA, APCO) or by the IETF with input from an emergency | organization (e.g., NENA, EENA, APCO) or by the IETF with input from | |||
services organization, and that the proposed message is sufficiently | an emergency services organization, and that the proposed message is | |||
distinguishable from other messages. | sufficiently distinguishable from other messages. | |||
The contents of this registry are: | The contents of this registry are: | |||
ID: An integer identifier to be used in the 'msgid' attribute of a | ID: An integer identifier to be used in the 'int-id' attribute of a | |||
metadata/control <request> element. | metadata/control <request> element. | |||
Message: The text of the message. Messages are listed in the | Message: The text of the message. Messages are listed in the | |||
registry in English; vehicles are expected to implement | registry in English; vehicles are expected to implement | |||
translations into languages supported by the vehicle. | translations into languages supported by the vehicle. | |||
When new messages are added to the registry, the message text is | When new messages are added to the registry, the message text is | |||
determined by the registrant; IANA assigns the IDs. Each message is | determined by the registrant; IANA assigns the IDs. Each message is | |||
assigned a consecutive integer value as its ID. This allows an IVS | assigned a consecutive integer value as its ID. This allows an IVS | |||
to indicate by a single integer value that it supports all messages | to indicate by a single integer value that it supports all messages | |||
skipping to change at page 35, line 15 ¶ | skipping to change at page 31, line 30 ¶ | |||
+----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ | +----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ | |||
| ID | Message | | | ID | Message | | |||
+----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ | +----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ | |||
| 1 | Emergency services has noted your information and location, | | | 1 | Emergency services has noted your information and location, | | |||
| | but cannot speak with you right now. We will help you as | | | | but cannot speak with you right now. We will help you as | | |||
| | soon as possible. | | | | soon as possible. | | |||
+----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ | +----+--------------------------------------------------------------+ | |||
Table 3: Emergency Call Static Message Registry Initial Values | Table 3: Emergency Call Static Message Registry Initial Values | |||
16.5. Emergency Call Vehicle Lamp ID Registry | 14.5. Emergency Call Vehicle Lamp ID Registry | |||
This document creates a new sub-registry called "Emergency Call | This document creates a new sub-registry called "Emergency Call | |||
Vehicle Lamp ID" in the "Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" | Vehicle Lamp ID" in the "Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" | |||
registry established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This new sub- | registry established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This new sub- | |||
registry uniquely identifies the names of automotive lamps (lights). | registry uniquely identifies the names of automotive lamps (lights). | |||
As defined in [RFC5226], this registry operates under "Expert Review" | As defined in [RFC5226], this registry operates under "Expert Review" | |||
rules. The expert should determine that the proposed lamp name is | rules. The expert should determine that the proposed lamp name is | |||
clearly understandable and is sufficiently distinguishable from other | clearly understandable and is sufficiently distinguishable from other | |||
lamp names. | lamp names. | |||
The contents of this registry are: | The contents of this registry are: | |||
Name: The identifier to be used in the 'lamp-ID' attribute of a | Name: The identifier to be used in the 'element-id' attribute of a | |||
metadata/control <request> element. | metadata/control <request> element. | |||
Description: A description of the lamp (light). | Description: A description of the lamp (light). | |||
The initial set of values is listed in Table 4. | The initial set of values is listed in Table 4. | |||
+----------------+---------------------------------------------+ | +----------------+---------------------------------------------+ | |||
| Name | Description | | | Name | Description | | |||
+----------------+---------------------------------------------+ | +----------------+---------------------------------------------+ | |||
| head | The main lamps used to light the road ahead | | | head | The main lamps used to light the road ahead | | |||
skipping to change at page 36, line 33 ¶ | skipping to change at page 32, line 33 ¶ | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| turn-left | Left turn/directional lamps | | | turn-left | Left turn/directional lamps | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| turn-right | Right turn/directional lamps | | | turn-right | Right turn/directional lamps | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| hazard | Hazard/four-way lamps | | | hazard | Hazard/four-way lamps | | |||
+----------------+---------------------------------------------+ | +----------------+---------------------------------------------+ | |||
Table 4: Emergency Call Lamp ID Registry Initial Values | Table 4: Emergency Call Lamp ID Registry Initial Values | |||
16.6. Emergency Call Vehicle Camera ID Registry | 14.6. Lamp State Registry | |||
This document creates a new sub-registry called "Lamp State" in the | ||||
"Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" registry established by | ||||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This new sub-registry uniquely identifies | ||||
the states that lamps (lights) can be placed into. As defined in | ||||
[RFC5226], this registry operates under "Expert Review" rules. The | ||||
expert should determine that the proposed lamp state is clearly | ||||
understandable and is sufficiently distinguishable from other lamp | ||||
states. | ||||
The contents of this registry are: | ||||
Name: The identifier to be used in the 'requested-state' attribute | ||||
of a metadata/control <request> element. | ||||
Description: A description of state of a lamp (light). | ||||
The initial set of values is listed in Table 5. | ||||
+-------+----------------------------------------+ | ||||
| Name | Description | | ||||
+-------+----------------------------------------+ | ||||
| on | The lamp is on (illuminated) | | ||||
| | | | ||||
| off | The lamp is off (extinguished) | | ||||
| | | | ||||
| flash | The lamp alternates between on and off | | ||||
+-------+----------------------------------------+ | ||||
Table 5: Lamp State Registry Initial Values | ||||
14.7. Emergency Call Vehicle Camera ID Registry | ||||
This document creates a new sub-registry called "Emergency Call | This document creates a new sub-registry called "Emergency Call | |||
Vehicle Camera ID" in the "Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" | Vehicle Camera ID" in the "Emergency Call Metadata/Control Data" | |||
registry established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This new sub- | registry established by [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall]. This new sub- | |||
registry uniquely identifies automotive cameras. As defined in | registry uniquely identifies automotive cameras. As defined in | |||
[RFC5226], this registry operates under "Expert Review" rules. The | [RFC5226], this registry operates under "Expert Review" rules. The | |||
expert should determine that the proposed camera name is clearly | expert should determine that the proposed camera name is clearly | |||
understandable and is sufficiently distinguishable from other camera | understandable and is sufficiently distinguishable from other camera | |||
names. | names. | |||
The contents of this registry are: | The contents of this registry are: | |||
Name: The identifier to be used in the 'camera-ID' attribute of a | Name: The identifier to be used in the 'element-id' attribute of a | |||
control <request> element. | control <request> element. | |||
Description: A description of the camera. | Description: A description of the camera. | |||
The initial set of values is listed in Table 5. | The initial set of values is listed in Table 6. | |||
+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ | +-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ | |||
| Name | Description | | | Name | Description | | |||
+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ | +-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ | |||
| backup | Shows what is behind the vehicle, e.g., often used | | | backup | Shows what is behind the vehicle, e.g., often used | | |||
| | for driver display when the vehicle is in reverse. | | | | for driver display when the vehicle is in reverse. | | |||
| | Also known as rearview, reverse, rear visibility, | | | | Also known as rearview, reverse, rear visibility, | | |||
| | etc. | | | | etc. | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| left-rear | Shows view to the left and behind (e.g., left side | | | left-rear | Shows view to the left and behind (e.g., left side | | |||
skipping to change at page 37, line 34 ¶ | skipping to change at page 34, line 34 ¶ | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| lane | Used by systems to identify road lane and/or | | | lane | Used by systems to identify road lane and/or | | |||
| | monitor vehicle's position within lane | | | | monitor vehicle's position within lane | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| interior | Shows the interior (e.g., driver) | | | interior | Shows the interior (e.g., driver) | | |||
| | | | | | | | |||
| night-front | Night-vision view of what is in front of the | | | night-front | Night-vision view of what is in front of the | | |||
| | vehicle | | | | vehicle | | |||
+-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ | +-------------+-----------------------------------------------------+ | |||
Table 5: Emergency Call Vehicle Camera ID Registry Initial Values | Table 6: Emergency Call Vehicle Camera ID Registry Initial Values | |||
17. Acknowledgements | 14.8. The emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS SIP INFO package | |||
We would like to thank Lena Chaponniere, Stephen Edge, Christer | This document registers the 'emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS' SIP INFO | |||
Holmberg, and Allison Mankin for their review and suggestions; Robert | package. | |||
Sparks and Paul Kyzivat for their help with the SIP mechanisms; | ||||
Michael Montag, Arnoud van Wijk, Ban Al-Bakri, Wes George, Gunnar | ||||
Hellstrom, and Rex Buddenberg for their feedback; and Ulrich Dietz | ||||
for his help with earlier versions of the original version of this | ||||
document. | ||||
18. Changes from Previous Versions | Both endpoints (the IVS and the PSAP equipment) include | |||
'emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS' in a Recv-Info header field per | ||||
[RFC6086] to indicate ability to receive SIP INFO messages carrying | ||||
data as described here. | ||||
18.1. Changes from draft-ietf-18 to draft-ietf-19 | Support for the 'emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS' SIP INFO package | |||
indicates the ability to receive NG-ACN related body parts as | ||||
specified in [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT]. | ||||
A SIP INFO request message carrying data related to an emergency call | ||||
as described in [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] has an Info-Package header field | ||||
set to 'emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS' per [RFC6086]. | ||||
The requirements of Section 10 of [RFC6086] are addressed in the | ||||
following sections. | ||||
14.8.1. Overall Description | ||||
This section describes "what type of information is carried in Info | ||||
requests associated with the Info Package, and for what types of | ||||
applications and functionalities UAs can use the Info Package." | ||||
SIP INFO requests associated with the emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS | ||||
SIP INFO package carry data associated with emergency calls as | ||||
defined in [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT]. The application is vehicle- | ||||
initiated emergency calls established using SIP. The functionality | ||||
is to carry vehicle data and metadata/control information between | ||||
vehicles and PSAPs. Refer to [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] for more | ||||
information. | ||||
14.8.2. Applicability | ||||
This section describes "why the Info Package mechanism, rather than | ||||
some other mechanism, has been chosen for the specific use-case...." | ||||
The use of the SIP INFO method is based on an analysis of the | ||||
requirements against the intent and effects of the INFO method versus | ||||
other approaches (which included the SIP MESSAGE method, SIP OPTIONS | ||||
method, SIP re-INVITE method, media plane transport, and non-SIP | ||||
protocols). In particular, the transport of emergency call data | ||||
blocks occurs within a SIP emergency dialog, per Section 7, and is | ||||
normally carried in the initial INVITE request and its response; the | ||||
use of the INFO method only occurs when emergency-call-related data | ||||
needs to be sent mid-call. While the SIP MESSAGE method could be | ||||
used, it is not tied to a SIP dialog as is the INFO method and thus | ||||
might not be associated with the dialog. Both the SIP OPTIONS or re- | ||||
INVITE methods could also be used, but is seen as less clean than the | ||||
INFO method. The SIP SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY method could be coerced into | ||||
service, but the semantics are not a good fit, e.g., the subscribe/ | ||||
notify mechanism provides one-way communication consisting of (often | ||||
multiple) notifications from notifier to subscriber indicating that | ||||
certain events in notifier have occurred, whereas what's needed here | ||||
is two-way communication of data related to the emergency dialog. | ||||
Use of the media plane mechanisms was discounted because the number | ||||
of messages needing to be exchanged in a dialog is normally zero or | ||||
very few, and the size of the data is likewise very small. The | ||||
overhead caused by user plane setup (e.g., to use MSRP as transport) | ||||
would be disproportionately large. | ||||
Based on the the analyses, the SIP INFO method was chosen to provide | ||||
for mid-call data transport. | ||||
14.8.3. Info Package Name | ||||
The SIP INFO package name is emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS | ||||
14.8.4. Info Package Parameters | ||||
None | ||||
14.8.5. SIP Option-Tags | ||||
None | ||||
14.8.6. INFO Request Body Parts | ||||
The body of an emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS SIP INFO package is a | ||||
multipart body which MAY contain zero or one application/ | ||||
emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS+xml (containing a VEDS data block) part, | ||||
zero or more application/emergencyCallData.control+xml (containing a | ||||
metadata/control object) parts, and zero or one application/ | ||||
emergencyCallData.eCall.MSD+per (containing an MSD) part. At least | ||||
one VEDS, MSD, or metadata/control body part is expected; the | ||||
behavior upon receiving a SIP INFO request with none is undefined. | ||||
The body parts are sent per [RFC6086], and in addition, to align with | ||||
with how these body parts are sent in non-INFO messages, each | ||||
associated body part is referenced by a Call-Info header field at the | ||||
top level of the SIP message. The body part has a Content- | ||||
Disposition header field set to "By-Reference". | ||||
A VEDS or metadata/control block is always enclosed in a multipart | ||||
body part (even if it would otherwise be the only body part in the | ||||
SIP message), since as of the date of this document, the use of | ||||
Content-ID as a SIP header field is not defined (while it is defined | ||||
for use as a MIME header field). The innermost multipart that | ||||
contains only body parts associated with the SIP INFO package has a | ||||
Content-Disposition value of Info-Package. | ||||
Service providers are not expected to add [RFC7852] Additional Data | ||||
to SIP INFO requests. | ||||
See [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] for more information. | ||||
14.8.7. Info Package Usage Restrictions | ||||
Usage is limited to vehicle-initiated emergency calls as defined in | ||||
[TBD: THIS DOCUMENT]. | ||||
14.8.8. Rate of INFO Requests | ||||
The SIP INFO request is used within an established emergency call | ||||
dialog for the PSAP to request the IVS to send an updated data set, | ||||
and for the IVS to send the requested data set. Because this is | ||||
normally done only on manual request of the PSAP call taker (who | ||||
suspects some aspect of the vehicle state has changed), the rate of | ||||
SIP INFO requests associated with the emergencyCallData.eCall.VEDS | ||||
SIP INFO package is normally quite low (most dialogs are likely to | ||||
contain zero SIP INFO requests, while others can be expected to carry | ||||
an occasional request). | ||||
14.8.9. Info Package Security Considerations | ||||
The MIME media type registations for the data blocks that can be | ||||
carried using this SIP INFO package contains a discussion of the | ||||
security and/or privacy considerations specific to that data block. | ||||
The "Security Considerations" and "Privacy Considerations" sections | ||||
of [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] discuss security and privacy considerations | ||||
of the data carried in vehicle-initiated emergency calls as described | ||||
in that document. | ||||
14.8.10. Implementation Details | ||||
See [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] for protocol details. | ||||
14.8.11. Examples | ||||
See [TBD: THIS DOCUMENT] for protocol examples. | ||||
15. Acknowledgements | ||||
We would like to thank Lena Chaponniere, Alissa Cooper, Stephen Edge, | ||||
Christer Holmberg, and Allison Mankin for their review and | ||||
suggestions; Robert Sparks and Paul Kyzivat for their help with the | ||||
SIP mechanisms; Michael Montag, Arnoud van Wijk, Ban Al-Bakri, Wes | ||||
George, Gunnar Hellstrom, and Rex Buddenberg for their feedback; and | ||||
Ulrich Dietz for his help with earlier versions of the original | ||||
version of this document. | ||||
16. Changes from Previous Versions | ||||
16.1. Changes from draft-ietf-18 to draft-ietf-19 | ||||
o Fixed various nits | o Fixed various nits | |||
18.2. Changes from draft-ietf-17 to draft-ietf-18 | 16.2. Changes from draft-ietf-17 to draft-ietf-18 | |||
o Added additional text to "Rate of Info Requests" | o Added additional text to "Rate of Info Requests" | |||
o Further corrected "content type" to "media type" | o Further corrected "content type" to "media type" | |||
18.3. Changes from draft-ietf-16 to draft-ietf-17 | 16.3. Changes from draft-ietf-16 to draft-ietf-17 | |||
o Clarified that an INFO request is expected to have at least one | o Clarified that an INFO request is expected to have at least one | |||
VEDS, MSD or metadata/control body part | VEDS, MSD or metadata/control body part | |||
o Corrected "content type" to "media type" | o Corrected "content type" to "media type" | |||
18.4. Changes from draft-ietf-14 to draft-ietf-15 | 16.4. Changes from draft-ietf-14 to draft-ietf-15 | |||
o Moved VEDS text from Introduction to new Vehicle Data section | o Moved VEDS text from Introduction to new Vehicle Data section | |||
o Various clarifications and simplifications | o Various clarifications and simplifications | |||
18.5. Changes from draft-ietf-13 to draft-ietf-14 | 16.5. Changes from draft-ietf-13 to draft-ietf-14 | |||
o Body parts now always sent enclosed in multipart (even if only | o Body parts now always sent enclosed in multipart (even if only | |||
body part in SIP message) and hence always have a Content- | body part in SIP message) and hence always have a Content- | |||
Disposition of By-Reference | Disposition of By-Reference | |||
o Fixed typos. | o Fixed typos. | |||
18.6. Changes from draft-ietf-11 to draft-ietf-13 | 16.6. Changes from draft-ietf-11 to draft-ietf-13 | |||
o Fixed typos | o Fixed typos | |||
18.7. Changes from draft-ietf-10 to draft-ietf-11 | 16.7. Changes from draft-ietf-10 to draft-ietf-11 | |||
o Clarifications suggested by Christer | o Clarifications suggested by Christer | |||
o Corrections to Content-Disposition text and examples as suggested | o Corrections to Content-Disposition text and examples as suggested | |||
by Paul Kyzivat | by Paul Kyzivat | |||
o Clarifications to Content-Disposition text and examples to clarify | o Clarifications to Content-Disposition text and examples to clarify | |||
that handling=optional is only used in the initial INVITE | that handling=optional is only used in the initial INVITE | |||
18.8. Changes from draft-ietf-09 to draft-ietf-10 | 16.8. Changes from draft-ietf-09 to draft-ietf-10 | |||
o Fixed errors in examples found by Dale in eCall draft | o Fixed errors in examples found by Dale in eCall draft | |||
o Removed enclosing sub-section of INFO package registration section | o Removed enclosing sub-section of INFO package registration section | |||
o Added text per Christer and Dale's suggestions that the MSD and | o Added text per Christer and Dale's suggestions that the MSD and | |||
metadata/control blocks are sent in INFO with a Call-Info header | metadata/control blocks are sent in INFO with a Call-Info header | |||
field referencing them | field referencing them | |||
o Other text changes per comments received from Christer and Ivo | o Other text changes per comments received from Christer and Ivo | |||
against eCall draft. | against eCall draft. | |||
18.9. Changes from draft-ietf-08 to draft-ietf-09 | 16.9. Changes from draft-ietf-08 to draft-ietf-09 | |||
o Added INFO package registration for eCall.VEDS | o Added INFO package registration for eCall.VEDS | |||
o Moved <capabilities> element and other extension points back to | o Moved <capabilities> element and other extension points back to | |||
eCall document so that extension points are in base spec (and also | eCall document so that extension points are in base spec (and also | |||
to get XML schema to compile) | to get XML schema to compile) | |||
o Text changes for clarification. | o Text changes for clarification. | |||
18.10. Changes from draft-ietf-07 to draft-ietf-08 | 16.10. Changes from draft-ietf-07 to draft-ietf-08 | |||
o Moved much of the metadata/control object from | o Moved much of the metadata/control object from | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] to this document as extensions | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] to this document as extensions | |||
o Editorial clarifications and simplifications | o Editorial clarifications and simplifications | |||
o Moved "Call Routing" to be a subsection of "Call Setup" | o Moved "Call Routing" to be a subsection of "Call Setup" | |||
o Deleted "Profile" section and moved some of its text into | o Deleted "Profile" section and moved some of its text into | |||
"Introduction" | "Introduction" | |||
18.11. Changes from draft-ietf-06 to draft-ietf-07 | 16.11. Changes from draft-ietf-06 to draft-ietf-07 | |||
o Minor editorial changes | o Minor editorial changes | |||
18.12. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 | 16.12. Changes from draft-ietf-05 to draft-ietf-06 | |||
o Added clarifying text regarding signed and encrypted data | o Added clarifying text regarding signed and encrypted data | |||
o Additional informative text in "Migration to Next-Generation" | o Additional informative text in "Migration to Next-Generation" | |||
section | section | |||
o Additional clarifying text regarding security and privacy. | o Additional clarifying text regarding security and privacy. | |||
18.13. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 | 16.13. Changes from draft-ietf-04 to draft-ietf-05 | |||
o Reworded security text in main document and in MIME registration | o Reworded security text in main document and in MIME registration | |||
for the VEDS object | for the VEDS object | |||
18.14. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 | 16.14. Changes from draft-ietf-03 to draft-ietf-04 | |||
o Added example VEDS object | o Added example VEDS object | |||
o Additional clarifications and corrections | o Additional clarifications and corrections | |||
o Removed references from Abstract | o Removed references from Abstract | |||
o Moved Document Scope section to follow Introduction | o Moved Document Scope section to follow Introduction | |||
18.15. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 | 16.15. Changes from draft-ietf-02 to draft-ietf-03 | |||
o Additional clarifications and corrections | o Additional clarifications and corrections | |||
18.16. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 | 16.16. Changes from draft-ietf-01 to draft-ietf-02 | |||
o This document now refers to [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] for technical | o This document now refers to [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] for technical | |||
aspects including the service URN; this document no longer | aspects including the service URN; this document no longer | |||
proposes a unique service URN for non-eCall NG-ACN calls; the same | proposes a unique service URN for non-eCall NG-ACN calls; the same | |||
service URN is now used for all NG-ACN calls including NG-eCall | service URN is now used for all NG-ACN calls including NG-eCall | |||
and non-eCall | and non-eCall | |||
o Added discussion of an NG-ACN call placed to a PSAP that doesn't | o Added discussion of an NG-ACN call placed to a PSAP that doesn't | |||
support it | support it | |||
o Minor wording improvements and clarifications | o Minor wording improvements and clarifications | |||
18.17. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 | 16.17. Changes from draft-ietf-00 to draft-ietf-01 | |||
o Added further discussion of test calls | o Added further discussion of test calls | |||
o Added further clarification to the document scope | o Added further clarification to the document scope | |||
o Mentioned that multi-region vehicles may need to support other | o Mentioned that multi-region vehicles may need to support other | |||
crash notification specifications such as eCall | crash notification specifications such as eCall | |||
o Minor wording improvements and clarifications | o Minor wording improvements and clarifications | |||
18.18. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to draft-ietf-00 | 16.18. Changes from draft-gellens-02 to draft-ietf-00 | |||
o Renamed from draft-gellens- to draft-ietf- | o Renamed from draft-gellens- to draft-ietf- | |||
o Added text to Introduction to clarify that during a CS ACN, the | o Added text to Introduction to clarify that during a CS ACN, the | |||
PSAP call taker usually needs to listen to the data and transcribe | PSAP call taker usually needs to listen to the data and transcribe | |||
it | it | |||
18.19. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 | 16.19. Changes from draft-gellens-01 to -02 | |||
o Fixed case of 'EmergencyCallData', in accordance with changes to | o Fixed case of 'EmergencyCallData', in accordance with changes to | |||
[RFC7852] | [RFC7852] | |||
18.20. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 | 16.20. Changes from draft-gellens-00 to -01 | |||
o Now using 'EmergencyCallData' for purpose parameter values and | o Now using 'EmergencyCallData' for purpose parameter values and | |||
MIME subtypes, in accordance with changes to [RFC7852] | MIME subtypes, in accordance with changes to [RFC7852] | |||
o Added reference to RFC 6443 | o Added reference to RFC 6443 | |||
o Fixed bug that caused Figure captions to not appear | o Fixed bug that caused Figure captions to not appear | |||
19. References | 17. References | |||
19.1. Normative References | 17.1. Normative References | |||
[I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] | [I-D.ietf-ecrit-ecall] | |||
Gellens, R. and H. Tschofenig, "Next-Generation Pan- | Gellens, R. and H. Tschofenig, "Next-Generation Pan- | |||
European eCall", draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-19 (work in | European eCall", draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-20 (work in | |||
progress), October 2016. | progress), November 2016. | |||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, | DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | |||
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an | [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an | |||
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, | IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008, | DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>. | |||
[RFC6086] Holmberg, C., Burger, E., and H. Kaplan, "Session | ||||
Initiation Protocol (SIP) INFO Method and Package | ||||
Framework", RFC 6086, DOI 10.17487/RFC6086, January 2011, | ||||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6086>. | ||||
[RFC6838] Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type | [RFC6838] Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type | |||
Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, | Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, | |||
RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC6838, January 2013, | RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC6838, January 2013, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6838>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6838>. | |||
[RFC6881] Rosen, B. and J. Polk, "Best Current Practice for | [RFC6881] Rosen, B. and J. Polk, "Best Current Practice for | |||
Communications Services in Support of Emergency Calling", | Communications Services in Support of Emergency Calling", | |||
BCP 181, RFC 6881, DOI 10.17487/RFC6881, March 2013, | BCP 181, RFC 6881, DOI 10.17487/RFC6881, March 2013, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6881>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6881>. | |||
skipping to change at page 41, line 40 ¶ | skipping to change at page 41, line 45 ¶ | |||
J. Winterbottom, "Additional Data Related to an Emergency | J. Winterbottom, "Additional Data Related to an Emergency | |||
Call", RFC 7852, DOI 10.17487/RFC7852, July 2016, | Call", RFC 7852, DOI 10.17487/RFC7852, July 2016, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7852>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7852>. | |||
[VEDS] Advanced Automatic Crash Notification (AACN) Joint APCO/ | [VEDS] Advanced Automatic Crash Notification (AACN) Joint APCO/ | |||
NENA Data Standardization Workgroup, , "Vehicular | NENA Data Standardization Workgroup, , "Vehicular | |||
Emergency Data Set (VEDS) version 3", July 2012, | Emergency Data Set (VEDS) version 3", July 2012, | |||
<https://www.apcointl.org/resources/telematics/aacn-and- | <https://www.apcointl.org/resources/telematics/aacn-and- | |||
veds.html>. | veds.html>. | |||
19.2. Informative references | 17.2. Informative references | |||
[RFC5012] Schulzrinne, H. and R. Marshall, Ed., "Requirements for | [RFC5012] Schulzrinne, H. and R. Marshall, Ed., "Requirements for | |||
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies", | Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies", | |||
RFC 5012, DOI 10.17487/RFC5012, January 2008, | RFC 5012, DOI 10.17487/RFC5012, January 2008, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5012>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5012>. | |||
[RFC5069] Taylor, T., Ed., Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H., and M. | [RFC5069] Taylor, T., Ed., Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H., and M. | |||
Shanmugam, "Security Threats and Requirements for | Shanmugam, "Security Threats and Requirements for | |||
Emergency Call Marking and Mapping", RFC 5069, | Emergency Call Marking and Mapping", RFC 5069, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC5069, January 2008, | DOI 10.17487/RFC5069, January 2008, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5069>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5069>. | |||
[RFC6086] Holmberg, C., Burger, E., and H. Kaplan, "Session | ||||
Initiation Protocol (SIP) INFO Method and Package | ||||
Framework", RFC 6086, DOI 10.17487/RFC6086, January 2011, | ||||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6086>. | ||||
[RFC6443] Rosen, B., Schulzrinne, H., Polk, J., and A. Newton, | [RFC6443] Rosen, B., Schulzrinne, H., Polk, J., and A. Newton, | |||
"Framework for Emergency Calling Using Internet | "Framework for Emergency Calling Using Internet | |||
Multimedia", RFC 6443, DOI 10.17487/RFC6443, December | Multimedia", RFC 6443, DOI 10.17487/RFC6443, December | |||
2011, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6443>. | 2011, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6443>. | |||
[RFC7378] Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H., and B. Aboba, Ed., | [RFC7378] Tschofenig, H., Schulzrinne, H., and B. Aboba, Ed., | |||
"Trustworthy Location", RFC 7378, DOI 10.17487/RFC7378, | "Trustworthy Location", RFC 7378, DOI 10.17487/RFC7378, | |||
December 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7378>. | December 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7378>. | |||
[triage-2008] | [triage-2008] | |||
End of changes. 119 change blocks. | ||||
525 lines changed or deleted | 530 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.45. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |