--- 1/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00.txt 2020-11-18 10:13:14.958619905 -0800 +++ 2/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01.txt 2020-11-18 10:13:14.970620210 -0800 @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ ecrit R. Gellens Internet-Draft Core Technology Consulting -Updates: 5222 (if approved) November 2, 2020 +Updates: 5222 (if approved) November 18, 2020 Intended status: Standards Track -Expires: May 6, 2021 +Expires: May 22, 2021 Changing the LoST Location Profile Registry Policy - draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-00 + draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01 Abstract This document changes the policy of the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profile registry established by RFC5222 from Standards Action to Specification Required. This allows standards development organizations (SDOs) other than the IETF to add new values. Status of This Memo @@ -24,21 +24,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on May 6, 2021. + This Internet-Draft will expire on May 22, 2021. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -86,27 +86,27 @@ No new security considerations are identified by this change in registry policy. 4. IANA Considerations IANA is requested to change the policy of the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profile Registry (established by [RFC5222]) to Specification Required. The expert reviewer is designated by the responsible area director. The reviewer should - verify that any proposed new value: + verify that: - o Is specified by the IETF, NENA, or a similar SDO in which location - profiles are in scope; - o Has a clear need (which includes there not being an existing - profile that meets the need); - o The profile specification is unambiguous and interoperable. + o the proposed new value is specified by the IETF, NENA, or a + similar SDO in which location profiles are in scope; + o the proposed new value has a clear need (which includes there not + being an existing profile that meets the need); + o the profile specification is unambiguous and interoperable. 5. Acknowledgements Many thanks to Ted Hardie for his helpful review and suggestions, and to Guy Caron for his suggestion to clarify that "clear need" includes there not being an existing profile. 6. References 6.1. Normative References