draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-08.txt		draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-09.txt
	Internet Area WG R. Bonica		Internet Area WG R. Bonica
	Internet-Draft Juniper Networks		Internet-Draft Juniper Networks
	Intended status: Best Current Practice F. Baker		Intended status: Best Current Practice F. Baker
	Expires: August 3, 2019 Unaffiliated		Expires: August 16, 2019 Unaffiliated
	G. Huston		G. Huston
	APNIC		APNIC
	R. Hinden		R. Hinden
	Check Point Software		Check Point Software
	O. Troan		O. Troan
	Cisco		Cisco
	F. Gont		F. Gont
	SI6 Networks		SI6 Networks
	January 30, 2019		February 12, 2019
	IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile		IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile
	draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-08		draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-09
	Abstract		Abstract
	This document describes IP fragmentation and explains how it reduces		This document describes IP fragmentation and explains how it reduces
	the reliability of Internet communication.		the reliability of Internet communication.
	This document also proposes alternatives to IP fragmentation and		This document also proposes alternatives to IP fragmentation and
	provides recommendations for developers and network operators.		provides recommendations for developers and network operators.
	Status of This Memo		Status of This Memo
	skipping to change at page 1, line 43 ¶		skipping to change at page 1, line 43 ¶
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on August 3, 2019.		This Internet-Draft will expire on August 16, 2019.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	skipping to change at page 20, line 21 ¶		skipping to change at page 20, line 21 ¶
	This document mitigates some of the security considerations		This document mitigates some of the security considerations
	associated with IP fragmentation by discouraging its use. It does		associated with IP fragmentation by discouraging its use. It does
	not introduce any new security vulnerabilities, because it does not		not introduce any new security vulnerabilities, because it does not
	introduce any new alternatives to IP fragmentation. Instead, it		introduce any new alternatives to IP fragmentation. Instead, it
	recommends well-understood alternatives.		recommends well-understood alternatives.
	10. Acknowledgements		10. Acknowledgements
	Thanks to Mikael Abrahamsson, Brian Carpenter, Silambu Chelvan,		Thanks to Mikael Abrahamsson, Brian Carpenter, Silambu Chelvan,
	Lorenzo Colitti, Mike Heard, Tom Herbert, Tatuya Jinmei, Jen Linkova,		Lorenzo Colitti, Mike Heard, Tom Herbert, Tatuya Jinmei, Jen Linkova,
	Paolo Lucente, Manoj Nayak, Eric Nygren, and Joe Touch for their		Paolo Lucente, Manoj Nayak, Eric Nygren, Fred Templin and Joe Touch
	comments.		for their comments.
	11. References		11. References
	11.1. Normative References		11.1. Normative References
	[RFC0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,		[RFC0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
	DOI 10.17487/RFC0768, August 1980,		DOI 10.17487/RFC0768, August 1980,
	<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc768>.		<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc768>.
	[RFC0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,		[RFC0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,
End of changes. 5 change blocks.
	6 lines changed or deleted		6 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/