--- 1/draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-08.txt 2019-02-12 08:13:12.865129158 -0800 +++ 2/draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-09.txt 2019-02-12 08:13:12.917130397 -0800 @@ -1,27 +1,27 @@ Internet Area WG R. Bonica Internet-Draft Juniper Networks Intended status: Best Current Practice F. Baker -Expires: August 3, 2019 Unaffiliated +Expires: August 16, 2019 Unaffiliated G. Huston APNIC R. Hinden Check Point Software O. Troan Cisco F. Gont SI6 Networks - January 30, 2019 + February 12, 2019 IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile - draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-08 + draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-09 Abstract This document describes IP fragmentation and explains how it reduces the reliability of Internet communication. This document also proposes alternatives to IP fragmentation and provides recommendations for developers and network operators. Status of This Memo @@ -32,21 +32,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on August 3, 2019. + This Internet-Draft will expire on August 16, 2019. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -907,22 +907,22 @@ This document mitigates some of the security considerations associated with IP fragmentation by discouraging its use. It does not introduce any new security vulnerabilities, because it does not introduce any new alternatives to IP fragmentation. Instead, it recommends well-understood alternatives. 10. Acknowledgements Thanks to Mikael Abrahamsson, Brian Carpenter, Silambu Chelvan, Lorenzo Colitti, Mike Heard, Tom Herbert, Tatuya Jinmei, Jen Linkova, - Paolo Lucente, Manoj Nayak, Eric Nygren, and Joe Touch for their - comments. + Paolo Lucente, Manoj Nayak, Eric Nygren, Fred Templin and Joe Touch + for their comments. 11. References 11.1. Normative References [RFC0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768, DOI 10.17487/RFC0768, August 1980, . [RFC0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,