draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-31.txt | draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-32.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
skipping to change at page 1, line 16 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 16 ¶ | |||
Intended status: Standards Track vaf.net Internet Consulting | Intended status: Standards Track vaf.net Internet Consulting | |||
Expires: September 6, 2020 D. Meyer | Expires: September 6, 2020 D. Meyer | |||
1-4-5.net | 1-4-5.net | |||
D. Lewis | D. Lewis | |||
Cisco Systems | Cisco Systems | |||
A. Cabellos (Ed.) | A. Cabellos (Ed.) | |||
UPC/BarcelonaTech | UPC/BarcelonaTech | |||
March 5, 2020 | March 5, 2020 | |||
The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) | The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) | |||
draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-31 | draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-32 | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
This document describes the Data-Plane protocol for the Locator/ID | This document describes the Data-Plane protocol for the Locator/ID | |||
Separation Protocol (LISP). LISP defines two namespaces, End-point | Separation Protocol (LISP). LISP defines two namespaces, End-point | |||
Identifiers (EIDs) that identify end-hosts and Routing Locators | Identifiers (EIDs) that identify end-hosts and Routing Locators | |||
(RLOCs) that identify network attachment points. With this, LISP | (RLOCs) that identify network attachment points. With this, LISP | |||
effectively separates control from data, and allows routers to create | effectively separates control from data, and allows routers to create | |||
overlay networks. LISP-capable routers exchange encapsulated packets | overlay networks. LISP-capable routers exchange encapsulated packets | |||
according to EID-to-RLOC mappings stored in a local Map-Cache. | according to EID-to-RLOC mappings stored in a local Map-Cache. | |||
skipping to change at page 19, line 15 ¶ | skipping to change at page 19, line 15 ¶ | |||
misconfiguration. | misconfiguration. | |||
Some xTRs and PxTRs performs re-encapsulation operations and need to | Some xTRs and PxTRs performs re-encapsulation operations and need to | |||
treat the 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) in a special way. | treat the 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) in a special way. | |||
Because the re-encapsulation operation is a sequence of two | Because the re-encapsulation operation is a sequence of two | |||
operations, namely a decapsulation followed by an encapsulation, the | operations, namely a decapsulation followed by an encapsulation, the | |||
ECN bits MUST be treated as described above for these two operations. | ECN bits MUST be treated as described above for these two operations. | |||
The LISP dataplane protocol is not backwards compatible with | The LISP dataplane protocol is not backwards compatible with | |||
[RFC6830] and does not have explicit support for introducing future | [RFC6830] and does not have explicit support for introducing future | |||
protocol changes (e.g. an explicit version field), However, the LISP | protocol changes (e.g. an explicit version field). However, the LISP | |||
control plane [I-D.ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis] allows an ETR to register | control plane [I-D.ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis] allows an ETR to register | |||
dataplane capabilities by means of new LCAF types [RFC8060]. In this | dataplane capabilities by means of new LCAF types [RFC8060]. In this | |||
way an ITR can be made aware of the dataplane capabilities of an ETR, | way an ITR can be made aware of the dataplane capabilities of an ETR, | |||
and encapsulate accordingly. The specification of the new LCAF | and encapsulate accordingly. The specification of the new LCAF | |||
types, new LCAF mechanisms, and their use, is out of the scope of | types, new LCAF mechanisms, and their use, is out of the scope of | |||
this document. | this document. | |||
6. LISP EID-to-RLOC Map-Cache | 6. LISP EID-to-RLOC Map-Cache | |||
ITRs and PITRs maintain an on-demand cache, referred as LISP EID-to- | ITRs and PITRs maintain an on-demand cache, referred as LISP EID-to- | |||
End of changes. 2 change blocks. | ||||
2 lines changed or deleted | 2 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |