--- 1/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-05.txt 2016-10-23 21:15:55.747608913 -0700 +++ 2/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-06.txt 2016-10-23 21:15:55.791609992 -0700 @@ -1,27 +1,27 @@ PCE Working Group E. Crabbe -Internet-Draft +Internet-Draft Oracle Intended status: Standards Track I. Minei -Expires: October 29, 2016 Google, Inc. +Expires: April 26, 2017 Google, Inc. J. Medved Cisco Systems, Inc. R. Varga Pantheon Technologies SRO X. Zhang D. Dhody Huawei Technologies - April 27, 2016 + October 23, 2016 Optimizations of Label Switched Path State Synchronization Procedures for a Stateful PCE - draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-05 + draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-06 Abstract A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) has access to not only the information disseminated by the network's Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), but also the set of active paths and their reserved resources for its computation. The additional Label Switched Path (LSP) state information allows the PCE to compute constrained paths while considering individual LSPs and their interactions. This requires a reliable state synchronization mechanism between the PCE and the @@ -46,21 +46,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on October 29, 2016. + This Internet-Draft will expire on April 26, 2017. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -862,43 +862,44 @@ P.R. China Email: xiegang09@huawei.com 13. References 13.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce] Crabbe, E., Minei, I., Medved, J., and R. Varga, "PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE", draft-ietf-pce-stateful- - pce-14 (work in progress), March 2016. + pce-16 (work in progress), September 2016. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC5440] Vasseur, JP., Ed. and JL. Le Roux, Ed., "Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)", RFC 5440, DOI 10.17487/RFC5440, March 2009, . 13.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp] Crabbe, E., Minei, I., Sivabalan, S., and R. Varga, "PCEP Extensions for PCE-initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE - Model", draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-05 (work in - progress), October 2015. + Model", draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-07 (work in + progress), July 2016. Authors' Addresses Edward Crabbe + Oracle Email: edward.crabbe@gmail.com Ina Minei Google, Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 US Email: inaminei@google.com