draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-05.txt   draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-06.txt 
Network Working Group J. Borkenhagen Network Working Group J. Borkenhagen
Internet-Draft AT&T Internet-Draft AT&T
Updates: 1997 (if approved) R. Bush Updates: 1997 (if approved) R. Bush
Intended status: Standards Track Internet Initiative Japan Intended status: Standards Track Internet Initiative Japan
Expires: December 1, 2019 R. Bonica Expires: December 12, 2019 R. Bonica
Juniper Networks Juniper Networks
S. Bayraktar S. Bayraktar
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
May 30, 2019 June 10, 2019
Well-Known Community Policy Behavior Well-Known Community Policy Behavior
draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-05 draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-06
Abstract Abstract
Well-Known BGP Communities are manipulated differently across various Well-Known BGP Communities are manipulated differently across various
current implementations; resulting in difficulties for operators. current implementations; resulting in difficulties for operators.
Network operators should deploy consistent community handling across Network operators should deploy consistent community handling across
their networks while taking the inconsistent behaviors from the their networks while taking the inconsistent behaviors from the
various BGP implementations into consideration.. This document various BGP implementations into consideration.. This document
recommends specific actions to limit future inconsistency, namely BGP recommends specific actions to limit future inconsistency, namely BGP
implementors must not create further inconsistencies from this point implementors must not create further inconsistencies from this point
skipping to change at page 2, line 4 skipping to change at page 2, line 4
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 1, 2019. This Internet-Draft will expire on December 12, 2019.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 5, line 49 skipping to change at page 5, line 49
neighbor ASN, the operator should confirm with that neighbor how the neighbor ASN, the operator should confirm with that neighbor how the
community will be treated. community will be treated.
7. Security Considerations 7. Security Considerations
Surprising defaults and/or undocumented behaviors are not good for Surprising defaults and/or undocumented behaviors are not good for
security. This document attempts to remedy that. security. This document attempts to remedy that.
8. IANA Considerations 8. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA Considerations; though the IANA may wish to The IANA is requested to list this document as an additional
refer to this document, if/when published, in [IANA-WKC]. reference for the [IANA-WKC] registry.
9. Acknowledgments 9. Acknowledgments
The authors thank Martijn Schmidt, Qin Wu for the Huawei data point, The authors thank Martijn Schmidt, Qin Wu for the Huawei data point,
Greg Hankins, Job Snijders, David Farmer, John Heasley, and Jakob Greg Hankins, Job Snijders, David Farmer, John Heasley, and Jakob
Heitz. Heitz.
10. Normative References 10. Normative References
[IANA-WKC] [IANA-WKC]
 End of changes. 5 change blocks. 
6 lines changed or deleted 6 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/