--- 1/draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-12.txt	2017-09-15 15:13:15.458704223 -0700
+++ 2/draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-13.txt	2017-09-15 15:13:15.570706898 -0700
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
 
 IP Performance Working Group                                   M. Mathis
 Internet-Draft                                               Google, Inc
 Intended status: Experimental                                  A. Morton
 Expires: March 19, 2018                                        AT&T Labs
                                                       September 15, 2017
 
             Model Based Metrics for Bulk Transport Capacity
-               draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-12.txt
+               draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-13.txt
 
 Abstract
 
    We introduce a new class of Model Based Metrics designed to assess if
    a complete Internet path can be expected to meet a predefined Target
    Transport Performance by applying a suite of IP diagnostic tests to
    successive subpaths.  The subpath-at-a-time tests can be robustly
    applied to critical infrastructure, such as network interconnections
    or even individual devices, to accurately detect if any part of the
    infrastructure will prevent paths traversing it from meeting the
@@ -199,21 +199,21 @@
    publication.
 
    REF Editor: The reference to draft-ietf-tcpm-rack is to attribute an
    idea.  This document should not block waiting for the completion of
    that one.
 
    Please send comments about this draft to ippm@ietf.org.  See
    http://goo.gl/02tkD for more information including: interim drafts,
    an up to date todo list and information on contributing.
 
-   Formatted: Fri Sep 15 11:14:13 PDT 2017
+   Formatted: Fri Sep 15 15:07:50 PDT 2017
 
    Changes since -11 draft:
 
    o  (From IESG review comments.)
    o  Ben Campbell: Shorten the Abstract.
    o  Mirja Kuhlewind: Reduced redundancy.  (See message)
    o  MK: Mention open loop in the introduction.
    o  MK: Spelled out ECN and reference RFC3168.
    o  MK: Added a paragraph to the introduction about assuming a
       traditional self clocked, window controlled transport protocol.
@@ -1608,24 +1608,24 @@
    reordering should be instrumented and the maximum reordering that can
    be properly characterized by the test (because of the bound on
    history buffers) should be recorded with the measurement results.
 
    Reordering tolerance and diagnostic limitations, such as the size of
    the history buffer used to diagnose packets that are way out-of-
    order, must be specified in a FSTIDS.
 
 8.  IP Diagnostic Tests
 
-   The IP diagnostic tests below are organized the technique used to
-   generate the test stream as described in Section 6.  All of the
-   results are evaluated in accordance with Section 7, possibly with
-   additional test specific critera.
+   The IP diagnostic tests below are organized according to the
+   technique used to generate the test stream as described in Section 6.
+   All of the results are evaluated in accordance with Section 7,
+   possibly with additional test specific critera.
 
    We also introduce some combined tests which are more efficient when
    networks are expected to pass, but conflate diagnostic signatures
    when they fail.
 
 8.1.  Basic Data Rate and Packet Transfer Tests
 
    We propose several versions of the basic data rate and packet
    transfer statistics test that differ in how the data rate is
    controlled.  The data can be paced on a timer, or window controlled