draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-03.txt | draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-04.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
OPSAWG R. Krishnan | OPSAWG R. Krishnan | |||
Internet Draft S. Khanna | Internet Draft S. Khanna | |||
Intended status: Informational Brocade Communications | Intended status: Informational Brocade Communications | |||
Expires: January 25, 2014 L. Yong | Expires: January 9, 2014 L. Yong | |||
July 9, 2013 Huawei USA | July 9, 2013 Huawei USA | |||
A. Ghanwani | A. Ghanwani | |||
Dell | Dell | |||
Ning So | Ning So | |||
Tata Communications | Tata Communications | |||
B. Khasnabish | B. Khasnabish | |||
ZTE Corporation | ZTE Corporation | |||
Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP Component Link Utilization in | Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP Component Link Utilization in | |||
Networks | Networks | |||
draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-03.txt | draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing-04.txt | |||
Status of this Memo | Status of this Memo | |||
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | |||
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. This document may not be modified, | provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. This document may not be modified, | |||
and derivative works of it may not be created, except to publish it | and derivative works of it may not be created, except to publish it | |||
as an RFC and to translate it into languages other than English. | as an RFC and to translate it into languages other than English. | |||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that | Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that | |||
skipping to change at page 1, line 42 | skipping to change at page 1, line 42 | |||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at | The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at | |||
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt | http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt | |||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at | The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at | |||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html | http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html | |||
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 9, 2009. | This Internet-Draft will expire on January 9, 2014. | |||
Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
skipping to change at page 21, line 33 | skipping to change at page 21, line 33 | |||
the ACM SIGCOMM, August 2011. | the ACM SIGCOMM, August 2011. | |||
[NDTM] Estan, C. and G. Varghese, "New directions in traffic | [NDTM] Estan, C. and G. Varghese, "New directions in traffic | |||
measurement and accounting," Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, August 2002. | measurement and accounting," Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, August 2002. | |||
[bin-pack] Coffman, Jr., E., M. Garey, and D. Johnson. Approximation | [bin-pack] Coffman, Jr., E., M. Garey, and D. Johnson. Approximation | |||
Algorithms for Bin-Packing -- An Updated Survey. In Algorithm Design | Algorithms for Bin-Packing -- An Updated Survey. In Algorithm Design | |||
for Computer System Design, ed. by Ausiello, Lucertini, and Serafini. | for Computer System Design, ed. by Ausiello, Lucertini, and Serafini. | |||
Springer-Verlag, 1984. | Springer-Verlag, 1984. | |||
Appendix A. Internet Traffic Analysis and Load Balancing Simulation | Appendix A. Internet Traffic Analysis and Load Balancing Simulation | |||
Internet traffic [CAIDA] has been analyzed to obtain flow statistics | Internet traffic [CAIDA] has been analyzed to obtain flow statistics | |||
such as the number of packets in a flow and the flow duration. The | such as the number of packets in a flow and the flow duration. The | |||
five tuples in the packet header (IP addresses, TCP/UDP Ports, and IP | five tuples in the packet header (IP addresses, TCP/UDP Ports, and IP | |||
protocol) are used for flow identification. The analysis indicates | protocol) are used for flow identification. The analysis indicates | |||
that < ~2% of the flows take ~30% of total traffic volume while the | that < ~2% of the flows take ~30% of total traffic volume while the | |||
rest of the flows (> ~98%) contributes ~70% [YONG]. | rest of the flows (> ~98%) contributes ~70% [YONG]. | |||
The simulation has shown that given Internet traffic pattern, the | The simulation has shown that given Internet traffic pattern, the | |||
hash-based technique does not evenly distribute the flows over ECMP | hash-based technique does not evenly distribute the flows over ECMP | |||
End of changes. 4 change blocks. | ||||
4 lines changed or deleted | 4 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |